Want this question answered?
It was Patrick Henry.
Because they saw a more powerful central government as a threat to the rights of individuals and the power of state governments.
A threat to Turkey's democratic and secular constitution with Islamic background.
The Anti-Federalists were a coalition of politicians prominent in state politics who unsuccessfully opposed the strong central government and opposed the ratification of the Constitution. Their reasons included that the strong national government proposed by the Federalists was a threat to the rights of individuals and the fear of reverting to monarchical rule. The Anti-Federalist movement led to adding a Bill of Rights.
anti federalist believed it was a threat because it infringed on there freedoms. this is the reason the federalist papers were written and the Bill of Rights was created, to ensure people that their freedoms would be upheld by the constitution. and not taken away by the constitution
The Federalists were statesmen and public figures supporting ratification of the proposed Constitution of the United States between 1787 and 1789. The Federalist Papers are documents associated with their movement.The Anti-Federalists argued that the strong national government proposed by the Federalists was a threat to the rights of individuals and that the President would become a king. They objected to the federal court system created by the proposed constitution. This produced a phenomenal body of political writing; the best and most influential of these articles and speeches were gathered by historians into a collection known as the Anti-Federalist Papers in allusion to the Federalist Papers.wikipedia.org
anti federalist believed it was a threat because it infringed on there freedoms. this is the reason the federalist papers were written and the Bill of Rights was created, to ensure people that their freedoms would be upheld by the constitution. and not taken away by the constitution
They saw the Christians as a threat to their government.
Dictatorship Its a form of government in which the ruler is an absolute dictator (not restricted by a constitution, laws or opposition etc.). He dominantes his subjects through threat of punishment and violence.
Her proposed Constitution was radical providing changes from the Bayonet Constitution which would have granted rights of citizenship like voting to Asians and Native Hawaiians. Minority White American Rule would have ended. The Queen simply had to go or their profits might have been cut in half.
its a dicator, or a king.dictatorship: a form of government in which the ruler is an absolute dictator (not restricted by a constitution or laws or opposition etc.)absolutism: dominance through threat of punishment and violence wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwnA government in which a single ruler is vested with absolute power.
Some of the effects of the Declaration of Independence are the birth of a more democratic form of government. It also proposed the idea that people were free to live without threat of tyranny. This idea inspired the world, and still does to this day.