During cooking (boiling, frying, grilling, baking) many chemical reactions are involved.
I don't see how cooked food would contaminate raw food, so it would logically have to be the latter.
The opposite of raw food is cooked food.
Overcooked food has been cooked to much. Undercooked food has been not cooked enough and raw food is not cooked at all.
NO
Overcooked food has been cooked to much. Undercooked food has been not cooked enough and raw food is not cooked at all.
It is dangerous as the bacteria from the raw food come into contact with the cooked food and infect it. One thing you must never do when storing food in the fridge-putting a raw dish a shelf above cooked food! This is because the raw food can drip as it is moist.
As a guess to the meaning of the rather vague question: the main change in food is from the raw state to the state of being cooked.
A raw food vegan diet does not consist of foods that have been cooked. Pasteurized milks, and cooked meats are also not a part of a raw food vegan diet.
Cooked food is free from harmful bacteria as the cooking has sterilised it. If the the raw food drips onto the cooked food then it will no longer be free from harmful bacteria and could make you ill if you ate it. For this reason you must always store food that has been cooked or to be eaten raw (such as fruit) above the raw meat so that drips can not contaminate it.
Cooked food...cooked meat...They lived from the 8th to mid -11th century.
Raw food in many cases is superior to cooked food for nutrient reasons. Research shows that the heating process of cooked food lessens its nutritional value. Of course, you would never eat raw meat or raw chicken, though, so the rules only apply to produce.
No. They eat their traditional foods cooked, not raw