answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

What there not many of the bridges which used to carry the ducts of aqueducts which carried water over long distances in Britain. This is because water could usually be found in nearby wells and rivers. However, it cannot be said that there is less evidence for aqueducts. Most of the aqueducts anywhere in the Roman Empire were underground pipes. Bridges were built only when aqueducts had cross a valley or when there was a need to keep the aqueduct at a gradient to keep the water flowing over a plain area. Ditches containing ceramic and concrete water pipes have been found at various locations in England. However, such structures are found only when someone happens to dig in the right place.

A sophisticated water-lifting apparatus excavated in London in 2001. It consists of two large timber-lined wells. Each has a chain of wooden buckets that lifted water continuously from the well into a nearby cistern which supplied the town.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why is there is less evidence of aqueducts in Britain?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Why is there less evidence of aqueducts in Britain than in France or Spain?

Because the Romans did not stay in Britain for as long as they stayed in France, Spain or Italy.


How did the romans bring clean water to britain?

Through their aqueducts.


What is some evidence of Roman aqueducts?

There are many still standing today.


Why are aqueducts have less water?

because you are crazy


3 things the Romans brought to Britain?

concrete, aqueducts and roads


Does any roman aqueduct work today?

Yes, some Roman aqueducts are still in use today. The city of Rome itself uses the Roman aqueducts and there are working aqueducts in Britain. There are likely other places as well.


Why might Frontinus' and Juvenal's evidence on aqueducts be unreliable?

The evidence might be unreliable because technology and other knowledge has advanced since that time, and their evidence might have been biased.


Where did Rome get aqueducts?

The Romans built aqueducts all over the Roman Empire, from Britain to Spain, from Gaul (France) to Greece, from Turkey to Palestine and across north Africa.


Where did they build roman aqueducts?

Aqueducts were built all over the empire wherever they were needed. There are ruins of them in Italy, France, Spain, Britain, Israel, Syria, Turkey, and probably many other places. The majority of the aqueducts were built underground, so we don't get to see them.Aqueducts were built all over the empire wherever they were needed. There are ruins of them in Italy, France, Spain, Britain, Israel, Syria, Turkey, and probably many other places. The majority of the aqueducts were built underground, so we don't get to see them.Aqueducts were built all over the empire wherever they were needed. There are ruins of them in Italy, France, Spain, Britain, Israel, Syria, Turkey, and probably many other places. The majority of the aqueducts were built underground, so we don't get to see them.Aqueducts were built all over the empire wherever they were needed. There are ruins of them in Italy, France, Spain, Britain, Israel, Syria, Turkey, and probably many other places. The majority of the aqueducts were built underground, so we don't get to see them.Aqueducts were built all over the empire wherever they were needed. There are ruins of them in Italy, France, Spain, Britain, Israel, Syria, Turkey, and probably many other places. The majority of the aqueducts were built underground, so we don't get to see them.Aqueducts were built all over the empire wherever they were needed. There are ruins of them in Italy, France, Spain, Britain, Israel, Syria, Turkey, and probably many other places. The majority of the aqueducts were built underground, so we don't get to see them.Aqueducts were built all over the empire wherever they were needed. There are ruins of them in Italy, France, Spain, Britain, Israel, Syria, Turkey, and probably many other places. The majority of the aqueducts were built underground, so we don't get to see them.Aqueducts were built all over the empire wherever they were needed. There are ruins of them in Italy, France, Spain, Britain, Israel, Syria, Turkey, and probably many other places. The majority of the aqueducts were built underground, so we don't get to see them.Aqueducts were built all over the empire wherever they were needed. There are ruins of them in Italy, France, Spain, Britain, Israel, Syria, Turkey, and probably many other places. The majority of the aqueducts were built underground, so we don't get to see them.


What is the evidence of the roman army being so successful?

Pay attention in your history class! The army's conquest of territories, construction of bridges, aqueducts and roads, and their peacekeeping presence should be evidence of their success.


Are aqueducts in rome or Greece?

Most ancient civilisations built aqueducts because of the importance of water. There were aqueducts both in Greece and Rome. The Roman aqueducts are more famous.


Where are aqueducts used?

Aqueducts were used back in Ancient Rome