answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

poor country are getting poorer because of poverty for example Africa they have every thing they need but because the don't have the material to cut it and make it into a Finish product so they lose alot of money because they are selling raw product example diamond they don't cut and make it into a finish product.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why poor countries are getting poorer while the rich countries getting richer?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about General History

How has China's economy changed China?

The rich gets richer, while the poor gets poorer.


Why is it that relatively poor countries uses labor intensive technology while rich countries tend to use capital intensive technology?

Relatively poor countries often have abundant labor resources and limited access to capital. Therefore, they tend to rely on labor-intensive technology as it is more cost-effective for them. On the other hand, rich countries have higher levels of capital and advanced technology, enabling them to invest in more capital-intensive technologies that increase productivity and efficiency.


What is the difference between a plebeian and patrician?

Plebeians are poorer citizens of the ancient republic of rome while Patricians are richer citizens of the ancient republic of rome. Plebeians also didn't have some rights such as not being able to hold office. When the Plebeians were finally fed up they pulled away but after some time the Patricians needed them so laws changed.


How is patricians and plebeians are different?

First of all both groups were Roman and had the sense of Roman patriotism. While initially the plebeians were the lower, poorer class, by the mid to late republic they were generally wealthy and were considered part of the aristocracy along with the patricians. Both classes held public office and the consulship.First of all both groups were Roman and had the sense of Roman patriotism. While initially the plebeians were the lower, poorer class, by the mid to late republic they were generally wealthy and were considered part of the aristocracy along with the patricians. Both classes held public office and the consulship.First of all both groups were Roman and had the sense of Roman patriotism. While initially the plebeians were the lower, poorer class, by the mid to late republic they were generally wealthy and were considered part of the aristocracy along with the patricians. Both classes held public office and the consulship.First of all both groups were Roman and had the sense of Roman patriotism. While initially the plebeians were the lower, poorer class, by the mid to late republic they were generally wealthy and were considered part of the aristocracy along with the patricians. Both classes held public office and the consulship.First of all both groups were Roman and had the sense of Roman patriotism. While initially the plebeians were the lower, poorer class, by the mid to late republic they were generally wealthy and were considered part of the aristocracy along with the patricians. Both classes held public office and the consulship.First of all both groups were Roman and had the sense of Roman patriotism. While initially the plebeians were the lower, poorer class, by the mid to late republic they were generally wealthy and were considered part of the aristocracy along with the patricians. Both classes held public office and the consulship.First of all both groups were Roman and had the sense of Roman patriotism. While initially the plebeians were the lower, poorer class, by the mid to late republic they were generally wealthy and were considered part of the aristocracy along with the patricians. Both classes held public office and the consulship.First of all both groups were Roman and had the sense of Roman patriotism. While initially the plebeians were the lower, poorer class, by the mid to late republic they were generally wealthy and were considered part of the aristocracy along with the patricians. Both classes held public office and the consulship.First of all both groups were Roman and had the sense of Roman patriotism. While initially the plebeians were the lower, poorer class, by the mid to late republic they were generally wealthy and were considered part of the aristocracy along with the patricians. Both classes held public office and the consulship.


What country is richer Kazakhstan or Uzbekistan?

Kazakhstan is a significantly wealthier country than Uzbekistan. The total GDP of Kazakhstan is $264.894 billion, while the total GDP of Uzbekistan is $123.577 billion.

Related questions

Is Brazil getting poorer or richer?

The rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer, while the middle class is staying the same, but internationally, Brazil is the 7th most economical powerful country in the world, but it will be fourth in a couple of years, so I guess you could say Brazil is getting richer everyday.


What are some of the variations between rich and poorer countries?

America has cell phones while other countries have never even heard of them. Some richer countries has almost all brand-name stores with a few second hand stores while poorer countries have almost completely second hand stores to buy food and such. Richer countries has grocery stores that have everything in it and they can order more, poorer countries have grocery stores that you buy everything you can because you don't know if it will be ordered again or when it will be ordered again.


How has China's economy changed China?

The rich gets richer, while the poor gets poorer.


Why do you think poorer countries tend to be in the south and richer countries tend to be in the north and list some possible reasons?

There does seem to be a pattern showing that the richer countries are in the north, and the poorer countries in the south. While there are some clear exceptions (Australia) it does seem that North America, Europe and Japan are far economically superior to South America, Africa and the Pacific. Perhaps it is because the people of the European region were among the first to develop superior technology and general civilisation. They also introduced these traits to other countries, particularly northern (U.S. and such). This is the only possible reason I can think of. If there are any additions to this, they would be greatly appreciated.


How was wealth distributed in 1920s?

There was an uneven distribution. The rich were getting richer, while the poor were getting more poor.


Who are the characters in the richer the poorer fable?

The characters are two sisters: one poor, one rich. The rich one is poor in character, meaning she wasn't happy, and the poor sister was rich in character meaning she was happy and she lived life to its fullest.


How does affluence militating against public examinations in Nigeria?

bcus d rich in nigeria believe so much on dis popular sayin "the rich gts richer while d poor gts poorer syndrome


What do critics say about market economies?

Critics commonly argue that in a market system the rich, who begin with a disproportionately large share of resources, tend to become richer while the poor, who begin with a disproportionately small share of resources, tend to become poorer.


How did unequal distribution of income affect the Great Depression?

the unequal distribution of income affected the great depression because while the rich got richer the poor become poorer. This gave an unbalanced economy in the united states. 80% of Americans had no savings at all.


What term is used to describe the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer?

Income inequality is the term used to describe the disparity in income distribution, where the rich continue to accumulate wealth while the poor struggle to improve their financial situations.


Why might earthquakes be more damaging in poor areas of the world?

Earthquakes kill more people in poorer countries, such as Haiti, than richer countries, such as Chile, because the richer countries can afford to build houses made with stronger materials. In Haiti, lots of families were poor and lived in mud houses or houses made with weak materials, so when the earthquake came, the houses and buildings fell down and killed more people, but in Chile, not as many people died because the houses and buildings protected them. Also, another factor is the price of medical care. in Haiti, they couldn't afford enough medical care for everyone, while Chile could.


Is the Netherlands richer than America?

Yes, the Netherlands (16m inhabitants) are richer than America (307m inhabitants). Per capita, the Netherlands are placed on the 7th place, while the US have the 9th place. Luxembourg, Norway, Qatar, Switzerland, Denmark and Ireland are richer than the Netherlands.