0
Why was it very unlikely that Harold could have won the battle and why did Harold had the better chance of winning?
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Harold did have an advantage , he was based high up on a hill , meaning he could rain down arrows and William had to shoot uphill. It was never unlikely that Harold could have won , he was winning until William used the tactic of running away and when the English ran after them , turning round and attacking them when the where broken ranks
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Who was better William or Harold Godwinson?
William won the battle of Hastings so he could be regarded as 'better'.
Why were the Native Americans successful in winning the battle of Little Bighorn?
they are winning because they made clothes and by inheritance they made better crops
Would it have been better if Harold had won the battle of the hastingsdid it change history for better or worse?
yes, because it would have faq u!
Why was William Normandy's army stronger than Harold godwinson?
wrong !! Willam was much better than harold as you can see in the battle of Hasting William had only 6000 knights while Harold had 2,000,000 soldiers Harold wasted many of his soldiers when he fought with Harald Hardrada , he did not use his mind . + The night before fighting William , Harold was having fun for winning Harald.H , He sang , drank wine , etc . while william made his soldiers sleep early . -------------------------------------------- Thank you !
Why Harold Godwinson was better than Harold Hardragar and William of Normandy?
William, duke of Normandy was a better leader because he has more prepared and had better tactics than Harold Godwinson. He was able to adapt to the battle at Hastings, when the Brettons ran from his army he surrounded and killed the group of Saxons who followed them. If Harold had been able to adapt to the battle as well he might have defeated William. Idk ask the people that were there... oh wait............ THEY'RE DEAD!
How did russia win the battle of kursk?
the the Red Army managed to push the Germans back to the dnieper and towards western Ukraine, winning the battle.
Who was better equipped to win battle of hastings?
The Norman leader William was much better equipped than the Anglo leader Harold. William had a good mixture of infantry and cavalry.
Why didn't harold godwinson have archers in battle of Hastings?
Yes! Because if they didn't, they wouldn't have won, NOW WOULD THEY!
What was the most important reason for the result of the battle of hastings?
The most important reason for the Battle of Hastings was to determine who would be ruler of England. In the battle, William I, or Wiliam the Conqueror defeated Harold Godwinson and became King of England.
What has the author Harold Honeyfield written?
Harold Honeyfield has written: 'For Better Governance'
Who was lucky to win the Battle of Hastings?
The Normans should have won the battle of Hastings because they had a better army and they were more prepared for war. Also, William the Conqurer had more reasons to become king then the other monarchs. In the end, it was they who won the battle.
Why William won the battle hasting?
the 3 main reasons are: 1. William had better tackticks then Harold 2. Harold had to leave half of his army behind 3. when harolds army saw the haleys commet the thought is was bad luck so when the turrend to see the commet Williams army took the chance and struck harolds team
