answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The general public in the US and its representatives in Congress were in a large majority isolationists during the period between WW1 and WW2. They were firmly convinced that the US should not get itself involved in the affairs of other countries in Europe and Asia, let alone get itself involved in any foreign war. There was a long tradition of US isolationism, starting with George Washington's maxim that the US should keep out of Europe's wars. Then there was the general opinion that US involvement in WW 1 had cost a great number of US casualties and a huge amount of money without serving any discernable interest of the US. The attitude of the other Allies' leaders after the war was seen as mostly self-serving and severely lacking in appreciation of US sacrifices and contributions.

The US public and most of its political leaders saw the rise of fascism as a purely European issue. Much of Germany's agression in the Thirties was moreover seen as aimed only at territories that had once been part of the German Empire before WW 1 or at territories with a large German population that was asking itself to be made part of Germany.

It would take Pearl Harbour to finally change the US public's attitude towards isolationism.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why was the us reluctant to respond to fascist military aggression?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

How did president Roosevelt respond to isolationist pressure in the face of fascist aggression?

He pushed to strengthen the Neutrality Act.


How did France and Britain respond to fascist aggression during 1930?

Appeasement until 3 September 1939 when they both declared war on Germany.


How did France and Britain respond to the fascist aggression during the 1930?

Appeasement until 3 September 1939 when they both declared war on Germany.


How did the US first respond to aggression in Europe?

they got in the fight


How did France and Britain respond to fascist aggresion during the 1930s?

Their policy was to appease Nazi Germany because they knew that they didn't have the military ability to do anything about Hitler's expansionist plans.


How did the league of nations western democracies respond to japan's aggression?

mad


How did the United states respond to soviet aggression in Greece and turkey?

absolute


How did the United states respond to Japanese aggression in Asia?

the drank coldine and got laid


How did Roosevelt's response to German aggression toward Britain differ from his response to Japanese aggression towards China?

With Germany Roosevelt waited longer to respond while with Japanese he acted much quicker to their aggression. Roosevelt condemned both acts of aggression.


How did Roosevelt response to German aggression toward Britain differ from his response to Japanese aggression toward China?

With Germany Roosevelt waited longer to respond while with Japanese he acted much quicker to their aggression. Roosevelt condemned both acts of aggression.


How did Roosevelt's response to German aggression towards Britain differ from his response to Japanese aggression towards china?

With Germany Roosevelt waited longer to respond while with Japanese he acted much quicker to their aggression. Roosevelt condemned both acts of aggression.


Why was Lincoln reluctant to defend Fort Sumter Why did he eventually respond to the situation by asking for Union troops?

He wasn't reluctant to defend Sumter, but the attack was a surprise and began the war so he needed troops.