Money affect loyalties. If the judges were paid by taxes from the local citizens, the judge is likely to be more favorable to the locals since they are source of his income. However, since the judges were paid by the British Monarch, they were representative of his views and not those of the local population. In a number of instances, laws promulgated by British Parliament for the colonies were absurd or counter to the needs of the colonists (often from lack of proper information or ideological disagreements). As a result, colonists would skirt these laws, but the judges would support a rigid, pro-British interpretation of the proper way to behave because they were paid directly by the sovereign.
Money affects loyalties. If the judges were paid by taxes from the local citizens, the judge is likely to be more favorable to the locals since they are source of his income. However, since the judges were paid by the British Monarch, they were representative of his views and not those of the local population. In a number of instances, laws promulgated by British Parliament for the colonies were absurd or counter to the needs of the colonists (often from lack of proper information or ideological disagreements). As a result, colonists would skirt these laws, but the judges would support a rigid, pro-British interpretation of the proper way to behave because they were paid directly by the sovereign.
they were unhappy with the king becase he taxed tea.
they dont do nothing
Probably because the king's pay would convince judges to side with the king, making for a biased court system. Since the Judge was being paid for by the king, he would want to rule in favor of the king. If the judges were being paid by the King Of England, then their ruling would tend to more in the direction of the King's rule. There was no uniquely American law, as it were, in this country until 1776 when the War of Independence took place and the Bill of Rights was drafted so the law of the land was still the same as Great Britain's.
dismissing colonial legislatures and generally denying the colonists their right to representationtaxing the colonists without their consentmaintaining a standing army in the colonies without the consent of the legislature and elevating the military above civilian authorityforcing colonists to house British soldiers in their homesmaking judges dependent on the King for their salaries and their tenure in officerefusing colonists the right to a trial in front of a jury of their peerscutting off the trade of the coloniesabolishing the charters, forms of government, and important laws of coloniesrefusing to address petitionsrenouncing the King's authority to govern the colonies by waging war on themencouraging revolts and Indian attacks on the colonies
because he gave unfair taxes and they had no representation in Parliament to be on their side and give their side of the story. And
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.' This affects judges impartiality. 'For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us.' Colonists were forced to allow soldiers to stay in their homes. 'He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.' No respect for lives.
Colonist would be unhappy because The King or Parliament would want to collect taxes. Royal Colonies were controlled by kings or rulers of nations and proprietary colonies were controlled by the people
Colonist would be unhappy because The King or Parliament would want to collect taxes. Royal Colonies were controlled by kings or rulers of nations and proprietary colonies were controlled by the people
one was ''no taxtation with out representation'' the king taxed the colonists with out caring about what the colonists had to say about it. the colonists thought it was unfair so they boycotted the goods that the the king taxed them on.
What did king George believe the colonists were acting like
No. The era of the Judges ended precisely when Saul was made king by the last of the Judges (Samuel). See also:The JudgesThe KingsSamuel
Ehud, the second judge of Israel, is known as the left-handed king in the book of Judges. He was left-handed and used this to his advantage in a cunning assassination of the Moabite king, Eglon.