The press is mentioned in the First Amendment of the Constitution but is not a formal division of our government and yet is often considered powerful enough to be one. The press's abilities to dig into a scandal or ignore a scandal or invent a scandal and to influence public opinion make it very powerful, powerful enough to be a "major agent of government change."
The press is mentioned in the First Amendment of the Constitution but is not a formal division of our government and yet is often considered powerful enough to be one. The press's abilities to dig into a scandal or ignore a scandal or invent a scandal and to influence public opinion make it very powerful, powerful enough to be a "major agent of government change."
The fact that they AREN'T mentioned in the Constitution leaves the issue open to interpretation. Some people saw a need, decided a local gov. was the solution, and that the Constitution didn't say you couldn't do it, so they created a local gov.
hmm, i wanna say the constitution or the declaration of independance (though i think it's the constitution).
Amendments were added to the constitution to change African Americans life. Such as no more slavery in any part of the US. The amendments were 15 though like 18.
Federalists believed in a strong central government. Obviously, the anti-federalists believed the very opposite. Some federalists might not have been completely satisfied with the US Constitution, but nobody really could be. The anti-federalists were very displeased with the US Constitution, though.
alexander hamilton
The press is mentioned in the First Amendment of the Constitution but is not a formal division of our government and yet is often considered powerful enough to be one. The press's abilities to dig into a scandal or ignore a scandal or invent a scandal and to influence public opinion make it very powerful, powerful enough to be a "major agent of government change."
Absolutely not. Parties are not even mentioned in the Constitution. Parties were a result of differing political views, though not mentioned in the constitution, they are not banned either.
Constitution if monarchy.. I think it's the answer though
You have to include what the following choices are on a "the following" question.
The fact that they AREN'T mentioned in the Constitution leaves the issue open to interpretation. Some people saw a need, decided a local gov. was the solution, and that the Constitution didn't say you couldn't do it, so they created a local gov.
hmm, i wanna say the constitution or the declaration of independance (though i think it's the constitution).
novanet- the powers of the federal government are explicitly granted by the constitution
Amendments were added to the constitution to change African Americans life. Such as no more slavery in any part of the US. The amendments were 15 though like 18.
The electoral college is absolutely mentioned in the Constitution (Article 2, Section 1); since it is constitutionally mandated, this means that even though some modern people think it is outdated and would like to see it abolished, such changes are unlikely to happen at any time soon. (To change it would require an amendment to the Constitution, and that takes time to achieve.)
We had a monarchy if you can call that a government. But besides that no. According to our Constitution we are still a monarchy though but we have a parlament and a primeminister running the country.
A constitutional government is any government whose authority and construction are defined by a constitution. The government need not be of a specific type, such as democratic, socialist, etc., but it does need to have parameters that are defined and relatively unchangeable.
the "unwritten constitution" consists of certain practices and traditions usually occurring in the government even though they were not included in any document. Some examples of the unwritten constitution are a two-party political system and the presidential cabinet.