No, not anymore. Congress passed The Line Item Veto Act of 1996, but the US Supreme Court declared the law unconstitutional in Clinton v. New York City, (1998), because they considered it to be a violation of Article I, Section 7 of the Constitution. The Constitution vests Congress with the power to craft legislation; the President can sign, or refuse to sign, only the entire packaged bill.
Several State Governors have this power,
The US president does not have this power. He must either approve or veto an entire bill and Congress can take advantage of this fact and combine something that the President approves of ,with something totally unrelated that he would like to veto.
If he had this power, he could veto only a line or portion of a bill and sign the rest into law. This power can be restricted to appropriations bills, in which case the President could veto certain expenditures but approve the ones that he found necessary.
When a Governer approves parts of a bill and vetos others, it is called using a "line item veto."
Line-item veto.
Line Item veto.
line item veto
Line- item veto
The line item veto is used only in budget bills
The line item veto is used only in budget bills
line-item veto
line-item veto
This would probably require a Constitutional amendment.
Line-item veto
The line item veto has little chance of passing.
This is called a line item veto. The US president does not have this power at present.
AnswerThe Supreme Court declared the Line Item Veto Act unconstitutional, therefor Congress had no authority to give the President that power.
I think it is pretty effective. The president does not have it because it was ruled unconstitutional. Some presidents may not want it.
maybe authority to use the line item veto
I know for a fact that California has "line-item" veto. Not sure if that's the same thing as item veto. Hope this helps : )