The two most widely-known answers are the tradition of Creation, and the theory of Evolution. According to the theory of Evolution, life developed by random processes, especially mutations.The narrative of Divine Creation, which is contained in Genesis ch.1 and 2, states that God created the universe. This teaches us that God exists, that our lives and the world are not random, and that the created things may be assumed to contain vast wisdom in their beautiful and purposeful design. (In recent decades, this wisdom has indeed been partially revealed, through increasingly powerful microscopes.)Evolution through random mutations, on the other hand, may be understood as implying that life is an accident, that perceived beauty and wisdom are ultimately purposeless, and that our instinctive yearning for the Eternal is just an electrical impulse in our brain.See also:Is there evidence against Evolution
The presence of international cuisine in local restaurants, the popularity of music genres from different countries, and the adoption of traditional clothing styles from other cultures all illustrate the concept of cultural diffusion in the present day.
Evolution There is no evidence, if we were all created by a big boom then we dont have a purpose in life, but if there is a God then we have purpose and meaning. Scientists cannot prove evolution exists because there is no way to prove it.Another answerWell, humans do exist. We know that. And The Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection is the only scientific theory explaining how any species comes about. We mustn't consider it too magical, where Evolution by Natural Selection is just one form of magic rather than another. Evolution is a perfectly normal process (inherent in all organism lineages) and humans are not unique enough to warrant anything more 'magical' than Evolution to pop into existence.Ah, the evidence you ask for. Well the pre-runner argument for evolution is that we are so similar to all our fellow organisms on the planet. We have hair and feed our young on milk and differentiated teeth - therefore (the argument goes) we must have a common ancestor with all those who have hair and feed young on milk...............We also have a backbone - therefore we have a common ancestor with all those that had a backbone..............And on the DNA level, our DNA is composed of chemicals called nitrogenous bases called adenine, thymine, cytosine and guanine, same as all other organisms - therefore we have a common ancestor with all DNA-containing organisms. In fact, genetic code is a very powerful argument as it is the very foundation of organisms themselves. From the genetic code comes a sequence of amino acids, which builds enzymes which keep the chemical goings-on going on in the cells of an organism. What is the likelihood that genetic codes COULD be so similar unless successful codes are passed on generation by generation while less successful codes die out. And how could we be here along with our fellows the Pan troglodytes (with such EXTRAORDINARILY similar DNA code unless we have a common ancestor with them? If the lineage leading to chimpanzees and the lineage leading to humans started at the beginning of life and never met up along the way, how could we be so similar today? The unlikelihood of millions of similarities unless in a world of common ancestry forces us to accept the idea of common ancestry.Forget the abstruseness of DNA if you find it abstruse. Look at the anatomy - we are so similar to chimpanzees, we must have a common ancestor with them.We have a circulatory system like that of a reptile partway through our embryonic development. How could we do that UNLESS we have the genetic code necessary to build a reptilian circulatory system? And then it is modified into a mammalian circulatory system. We are covered in hair (lanugo) near to our birth but still within the womb. These ideas come from Jerry Coyne's book Why Evolution is True - an extraordinary book. They are evidence for our mammalian evolution from an apeworld past and from a purely mammalian past and from a reptilian past.And then there are the fossils - again check out Why Evolution is True. Homo neanderthalensis, Homo habilis, Homo erectus. And there's also Australopithecus. We have 'parabolic' (rounded) bites - what I mean is the shape of missing sandwich left when you bite a sandwich. Chimpanzees and gorillas have square bites. Australopithecus had an intermediate bite. We assume that square bite was around earlier and left a lineage going on to Pan and Gorilla still with square bites. Humans have a square bite common ancestor with Chimpanzees and Australopithecus shows the transition from square bite to rounded bite. What an endless and fascinating pile of evidence for evolution.
I assume you speak of the true controversy that exists in anthropology. Basically this is an argument between " lumpers " and " splitters. " The lumpers want to lump all the various branches of hominids together in a tighter family, thus showing a ancestral progression that is able to be followed easily. The splitters cleave the various hominids onto many more species thus making it very hard to follow the ancestral trail. This is not meant to explain all here, but to give one reason for the controversies in this area.
Humans.We are the only hominid species that still exist. Our taxon is Homo-Sapien Sapien. Most people just say Homo-Sapien, even though the actual Homo-Sapien species is extinct.
Evolution is an ongoing process that will continue as long as life exists. As long as organisms continue to reproduce and environments change, evolution will continue to shape the diversity of life on Earth.
Not one exists
He doesn't
Czechoslovakia no longer exists. It split into two countries in 1993. They are over 14 degrees east of the prime meridian.Czechoslovakia no longer exists. It split into two countries in 1993. They are over 14 degrees east of the prime meridian.Czechoslovakia no longer exists. It split into two countries in 1993. They are over 14 degrees east of the prime meridian.Czechoslovakia no longer exists. It split into two countries in 1993. They are over 14 degrees east of the prime meridian.Czechoslovakia no longer exists. It split into two countries in 1993. They are over 14 degrees east of the prime meridian.Czechoslovakia no longer exists. It split into two countries in 1993. They are over 14 degrees east of the prime meridian.Czechoslovakia no longer exists. It split into two countries in 1993. They are over 14 degrees east of the prime meridian.Czechoslovakia no longer exists. It split into two countries in 1993. They are over 14 degrees east of the prime meridian.Czechoslovakia no longer exists. It split into two countries in 1993. They are over 14 degrees east of the prime meridian.Czechoslovakia no longer exists. It split into two countries in 1993. They are over 14 degrees east of the prime meridian.Czechoslovakia no longer exists. It split into two countries in 1993. They are over 14 degrees east of the prime meridian.
countries have armies so they can defend their country from other countries armies.lol
china laos
Evolution doesn't take 4.2 billion years. It takes forever and no time at all. Where life is, there evolution is happening, and it will continue to happen as long as life exists.
One word: extinction. As long as life exists, organisms will reproduce with variation - which means per definition that evolution will occur. The only way for evolution to stop happening is for life to cease existing.
As the USSR no longer exists as a sovereign state all countries are free from it.
Confucianism teaches that human evolution exists, rather than creationism. There is a highly optimistic view on human nature, that human beings are teachable and improvable.
Deistic evolution
Sadly Homophobia exists in all countries on the planet.