0
Abraham Ortelius, a 16th-century cartographer, provided evidence for his theory of continental drift primarily through the observation of the jigsaw-like shapes of the continents, particularly how the Coastlines of South America and Africa fit together. He also noted similarities in the geological features and fossil records across different continents, which suggested they had once been connected. His work, "Theatrum Orbis Terrarum," compiled maps that illustrated these connections, laying the groundwork for later theories of plate tectonics. However, it's important to note that Ortelius's ideas were not widely accepted until much later, as the mechanisms behind continental movement were not understood in his time.
What else can I help you with?
Why did most scientists reject Wegner theory for nearly a half century?
They rejected Wenger's theory for half a century because he didn't have the evidence to prove his theory No, He did have evidence to prove his theory, they just did not believe him- TheSystem because of their lack of knowledge of the Earth He actually had evidence, but it was actually because the hypothesis interferred with their own hypothesis about how mountains form.
What evidence did wegener have to prove his hypothesis?
Alfred Wegener used several pieces of evidence to support his theory of continental drift, including the fit of continents like South America and Africa, similarities in rock formations and fossils across continents, and the matching of ancient climate indicators like glaciation patterns. Despite facing initial skepticism, Wegener's evidence paved the way for the development of the theory of plate tectonics.
What evidence proves that gravity is a force at a distance?
We observe planets, moons, comets, and artificial satellites and space probes moving in relation to the central body within their orbits exactly as we would expect them to move if the theory of universal gravitation is true. This evidence supports the theory of force at a distance due to universal gravitation, but doesn't prove it. It's still "only a theory", which can never be proven, but can be disproven in half-a-second if we ever see a situation where it's not working that way.
Does the multiverse exist?
The multiverse is a hypothetical concept in which there are multiple universes that exist parallel to our own. While there is no direct evidence to prove the existence of a multiverse, it is a concept that arises from certain theories in physics and cosmology. Currently, the idea of a multiverse is still a topic of speculation and debate among scientists.
Who used his telescope to prove the heliocentric theory?
Galileo Galilei used his telescope to provide crucial evidence supporting the heliocentric theory, which posits that the Earth and other planets orbit the Sun. His observations of celestial bodies, such as the phases of Venus and the moons of Jupiter, challenged the geocentric model and helped establish the validity of Copernicus's earlier work. Galileo's findings were significant in advancing the scientific revolution and changing our understanding of the cosmos.
What was Abraham Ortelius's evidence?
Abraham Ortelius was a cartographer and mapmaker who is known for creating the first modern atlas in 1570 called "Theatrum Orbis Terrarum". His evidence was based on compiling information from various sources, including explorers' reports, travelers' journals, and existing maps, to create a comprehensive and accurate representation of the world known at that time. Ortelius's atlas was groundbreaking in its use of a uniform scale and design, which set a new standard for mapmaking.
What evidence did Arthur Holmes have to support his theory?
he didn't have anything to prove
Why did most scientists reject Wegner theory for nearly a half century?
They rejected Wenger's theory for half a century because he didn't have the evidence to prove his theory No, He did have evidence to prove his theory, they just did not believe him- TheSystem because of their lack of knowledge of the Earth He actually had evidence, but it was actually because the hypothesis interferred with their own hypothesis about how mountains form.
What did Alfred Weneger try to prove?
Alfred Weneger was trying to prove his theory of Continental Drift. Many other scientists before him had the same theory, but they never could prove it. He had five pieces of evidence.
How was Dalton's atomic theory similar to democritus's atomic theory?
They both thought the same theory but Dalton had evidence to prove it, unlike Democritus.
Why were most scientists disagreeing with Alfred Wegeners continental drift theory?
There was no evidence to prove it
Is a kracken real?
i believe that the kracken really does exist, but we have no real evidence to prove that theory.....
Future evidence can prove a scientific theory to be incorrect.Is the following true or false?
True.
Can a hypothesis lead to a theory.?
Yes, because if enough people prove the hypothesis and produce evidence supporting it it can become a theory.
How can you use math in science?
To figure out formulas and equations and claculations to prove or add evidence to a theory.
What is supported by experimental evidence using a scietific methodology to prove or disprove any assumtions?
A theory.
What is an idea that explains something?
An idea that explains something could be called a theory. Good scientific theories are falsifiable which means you could prove it to be false. You can never prove a theory to be true, you can only provide evidence that supports the theory.
