It Depends If The Red Flower Is Dominant then it should Be RR but if its Recessive then its rr so depending on the F1 you should know the Genotype of The Red FLower.
it is an observable expression of somethings genotype, that is the alleles that the organism has i.e a red flower may be homozygous containing two 'red pigment alleles' (RR) this is its genotype, its phenotype is the red colour of its petals
A good example of incomplete dominance is the color of Japanese 4 o'clock flowers. A red Japanese 4 o'clock will have the genotype RR. A white Japanese 4 o'clock will have the genotype WW.When these two flowers are crossbred, each will give one of their genes. The red flower will give a R (for red) gene. The white flower will give a W (for white) gene. The offspring will have the genotype RW.Since neither of these are recessive, (recessive genes have lower case letters) they both show up in the phenotype. The result is a mix of red and white: pink flowers!Had the white gene been recessive, and the offspring had the genotype Rw, then the flower would be red. Since both are dominant, they have incomplete control of the phenotype.
When they don't have pink as their color so the "parents" had to of been either both white or both pink. That is how you can tell when snapdragons are not following the pattern of complete dominance.
When neither allele is dominant, the trait that results depends on whether there is codominance or incomplete dominance. In codominance, that traits coded for by both alleles are expressed. For example, if R codes for red and r codes for white, a flower with the genotype Rr would be white with red spots/splotches/stripes/etc. (or red with white spots) - so it is showing both traits. In incomplete dominance - a mixture of the two traits is seen. For example, if R codes for red and r codes for white, a flower with the genotype Rr would be pink (a mixture of red a white).
No it would not. It would depend on the type of plant, but let's say say a white flower has two recessive genes and a red plant had two dominant genes, a pink flower would have a dominant and recessive gene. This would be an example of incomplete dominance because the red gene does not completely overshadow the white gene
incomplete dominance
If you cross a red 4 O'clock with a white 4 O'clock, the phenotype will be pink This is because red has incomplete dominance over white, so the alleles blend. If yellow is crossed with white, the flowers are always yellow.
it is an observable expression of somethings genotype, that is the alleles that the organism has i.e a red flower may be homozygous containing two 'red pigment alleles' (RR) this is its genotype, its phenotype is the red colour of its petals
A good example of incomplete dominance is the color of Japanese 4 o'clock flowers. A red Japanese 4 o'clock will have the genotype RR. A white Japanese 4 o'clock will have the genotype WW.When these two flowers are crossbred, each will give one of their genes. The red flower will give a R (for red) gene. The white flower will give a W (for white) gene. The offspring will have the genotype RW.Since neither of these are recessive, (recessive genes have lower case letters) they both show up in the phenotype. The result is a mix of red and white: pink flowers!Had the white gene been recessive, and the offspring had the genotype Rw, then the flower would be red. Since both are dominant, they have incomplete control of the phenotype.
A good example of incomplete dominance is the color of Japanese 4 o'clock flowers. A red Japanese 4 o'clock will have the genotype RR. A white Japanese 4 o'clock will have the genotype WW.When these two flowers are crossbred, each will give one of their genes. The red flower will give a R (for red) gene. The white flower will give a W (for white) gene. The offspring will have the genotype RW.Since neither of these are recessive, (recessive genes have lower case letters) they both show up in the phenotype. The result is a mix of red and white: pink flowers!Had the white gene been recessive, and the offspring had the genotype Rw, then the flower would be red. Since both are dominant, they have incomplete control of the phenotype.
100% purple flowers
When they don't have pink as their color so the "parents" had to of been either both white or both pink. That is how you can tell when snapdragons are not following the pattern of complete dominance.
When neither allele is dominant, the trait that results depends on whether there is codominance or incomplete dominance. In codominance, that traits coded for by both alleles are expressed. For example, if R codes for red and r codes for white, a flower with the genotype Rr would be white with red spots/splotches/stripes/etc. (or red with white spots) - so it is showing both traits. In incomplete dominance - a mixture of the two traits is seen. For example, if R codes for red and r codes for white, a flower with the genotype Rr would be pink (a mixture of red a white).
No it would not. It would depend on the type of plant, but let's say say a white flower has two recessive genes and a red plant had two dominant genes, a pink flower would have a dominant and recessive gene. This would be an example of incomplete dominance because the red gene does not completely overshadow the white gene
ty
they are normally silk its normally a red or a blue with a flower pattern
You can purchase Water Lilies which are a light blue on the outside however on the inside it is a deep pink with a slight red tinge, I recommend this flower as it is a very pretty, elegant gift which represents purity.