Complete the septenees with the verbn brackets in the present simple passivе. Complete the septenees with the verbn brackets in the present simple passivе.
The ice ... into small pieces. (break)
The floors ... every day. (no/ean)
I ... to go to every meeting. (not/expect)
Martin ... a lot of homework. (give)
You ... downstairs. (need)
The information ... forever. (not keep)
All the eхаm results ... by the head teacher. (see)
The best ice сream ... in Italy (make)
Оmelettes ... with eggs. (make)
... we ... to the party on Sunday? (invite)
How often ... your room ... (clean)
English and maths ... in all schools. (study)
Smart phones ... to access the internet. (use)
... pandas ... in zoos? (keep)
English ... in many countries. ( speak)
How often ... the Olympic Games ... ? (hold)
Нow ... your name ... ? (spell)
yes, you could keep on breaking an ice cube forever, yet it would at one point melt.
Yes, and no. You could keep breaking, and breaking an ice cube, but eventually it would melt.
As a substance is broken, the surface area greatly increases. For example a 2 meter cube has a total surface area of 24 square meters. If a 1 meter cube is cut out of one corner, the total surface area is now 30 square meters.
Melting of an ice cube mainly depends on the temperature of surrounding. If the larger ice cube is put at 50 degrees Celsius and small one at 25 degree Celsius the large ice cube will melt faster than the smaller one. Ice cube draws energy from the surrounding which causes it to melt and so temperature of surrounding is very important
cold like an ice cube in her heart
No, an ice cube doesn't melt faster in soil.
You should try it. But it might take a while to break it down to one molecule, which is as small as it could be while still being ice (any smaller and you're breaking the water down into hydrogen and oxygen, and you'd no longer have ice. If you kept going after that....well, don't even get me started on quarks and the like!).
Yes, and no. You could keep breaking, and breaking an ice cube, but eventually it would melt.
Ice cubes are not always true cubes to begin with but we call them that anyway. If you were to break one it would just be smaller pieces of ice which depending on your perception could still be called cubes.
The best way to cut cheese into smaller pieces is to partially freeze the cheese and cut it while it is partially frozen.
It is a yes and no question because you can keep breaking it down but eventually it will melt.
If a cube of jello is cut into two pieces the density of the pieces do not change.
Its impossible.
Edge of the larger cube = 32 cm Volume of the larger cube = (32 cm)3 = 32768 cm3 Edge of the smaller cube = 4 cm Volume of the smaller cube = (4 cm)3 = 64 cm3 Since the smaller cubes are cut from the larger cube, volume of all of them will be equal to that of the larger cube. ∴ Total number of smaller cubes × Volume of the smaller cube = Volume of the larger cube ⇒ Total number of smaller cubes = Volume of the larger cube ÷ Volume of the smaller cube ⇒ Total number of smaller cubes = 32768 ÷ 64 = 512 Thus, 512 smaller cubes can be cut from the larger one.
As a substance is broken, the surface area greatly increases. For example a 2 meter cube has a total surface area of 24 square meters. If a 1 meter cube is cut out of one corner, the total surface area is now 30 square meters.
No. Each piece of the cube would have the same density.
9 pieces
21 cuts required to cut a cube into 504 identical pieces.