When it comes to burning calories, your heart rate is much more important than what it is that you are doing. If you can reach and sustain the same heart rate for the same amount of time you will burn pretty much the same amount of calories regardless of activity.
Since jogging will lead to a higher heart rate than walking, you will, minute for minute, burn more calories jogging.
No, running will burn far more calories.
when you do kickboxing you burn off more calories cause you are more active and moving around.
Oh, sure. Living bodies always burn calories, you can't stop it. And the more you move, the more you burn. And as bike riding involve a fair amount of movement, it can burn plenty of calories.
Running because it uses more energy. You are moving faster And your heart beats faster burning more calories.
Squash involves a lot of movement and running and this is all exercise. The more the body has to move and the more energy this takes, the more calories it will burn.
Biking and running both offer health benefits, but they target different muscle groups and have varying impacts on the body. Running is a weight-bearing exercise that can improve bone density and cardiovascular health, while biking is a low-impact exercise that is gentler on the joints. Running may burn more calories per mile, but biking can be a more sustainable form of exercise for those with joint issues. Ultimately, the best choice depends on individual fitness goals and preferences.
For most people the calories would be very close to the same. Remember when you are on a treadmill you don't have the wind resistance to deal with. This could cause a slight difference in calorie burn, making running outside burn a few more calories.
theoretically a heavier person will burn more calories running the same distance than a lighter person. There is more muscle and more mass to be moved on a heavier person therefore more energy is needed.
Riding a bike because your legs are doing more work then running.
It usually comes down to whatever is harder. If you run 5 miles in 40 minutes and give it everything you have, you burn a lot more calories than you do walking for 60 minutes. Just another tidbit, Sprinting burns a lot more calories than long distance running. Sprinters can be burning calories up to 3 days after a workout. The faster you run, the harder it is so therefore the more calories you burn so you would burn more calories running 5 miles in 40 minutes vs pacing yourself and doing it in 60
Depends on a lot of things, you gender, your age, your weight, your fitness level to start with, but mainly with how hardand for how long you keep it up.Me, going flat out can burn up to, and a tad over 1000 cals/hour, but 450-600 cals is a more normal value.
No. You will burn many more calorie running the same distance than you would by walking.