I can supply the basic strategy for the Pacific Theatre for you. It was to eventually obtain air bases close enough to Japan to support a complete blockade of the island and to allow our B-29 and B-17 bombers to bomb the enemy into submission, or at least soften it up for an invasion. We accomplished this strategy by the invasion and occupation of the islands of Saipan/Tinean, Iwo Jima and Okinawa. the strategy was called "island hopping". this went they didn't try to capture every island in the pacific but skip there way to bombing range of Tokyo. by surpassing these islands they saved time, supplies, troups, etc. and effectively cut off islands of Japanese troups rendering them useless. Biased answer
American strategy in Europe was to hold Germany, keep them from expanding. Thus American armed forces were used to bomb German cities and military targets. Troops were used to occupy French colonies to prevent Axis expansion into them.
It wasn't until mid 1943 that the USA even began operations on land in Europe, that being the invasion of the peripheral territory of Sicily.
After the Soviets had taken most of the fight out of the German army, the USA along with Britain finally decided to a major invasion of France, June 1944. Probably coming a year later than necessary due to British foot dragging, this invasion led quickly to German over extension and collapse.
In the air war, the USA at least ostensibly tried to maintain attacks on military or industrial targets using daylight bombing. The British had no such qualms and went directly after civilians, killing hundreds of thousands in Germany.
In the Pacific the USA was pretty much alone and thus had a much more direct and reasonable strategy. There the plan was to isolate the various Japanese island fortresses, by passing most, occupying a few for bases, and thus leapfrogging across the Pacific.
The Japanese helped out by overtending themselves in the Midway campaign which effectively took the Japanese navy out of the strategic war (June 1943).
Ultimately the USA leapfrogged all the way to the Philippines and Okinawa. It was then that the USA began its own indiscriminate massacre of civilians via a bombing campaign. There was a nod towards attacking militarily important targets but mainly the attacks were meant to kill as many Japanese civilians as possible in the hope that the government would collapse. This strategy was a failure since the Japanese never seriously considered surrender due to bombing alone. It was the combination of bombing, a starvation blockade, and a threat of Soviet invasion that finally caused the Japanese to quit in 1945.
It is important to note that the decision to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki had the greatest effect on the Japanese decision to surrender.
CHARGED
maybe
They were equipped well at the start of the war but as the war continued supplies dropped and they had more basic equipment as the war went on.
yes there was a war in the renaissances
The German war aims during World War 1 were to expand their territory and influence in Europe, establish themselves as a dominant power, and secure access to resources. These aims led to aggressive military strategies and alliances that escalated the conflict and ultimately contributed to Germany's defeat in the war.
turtles
CHARGED
maybe
They built up their military and militaristic strategies/skills early prior to World War II.
they used basic cooking skills in world war one
I would say since they were from different time periods there were different strategies used.
There wasn't any fighting in the cold war besides the Suez crisis in Egypt so the weapons had nothing to do with the cold war and also the cold war was after world WA 2
They were equipped well at the start of the war but as the war continued supplies dropped and they had more basic equipment as the war went on.
It's about a horse's point of view in world war one and what they went through.
yes there was a war in the renaissances
What where the strategies for the Fredericksburg war
Japan and Germany