The Federalists and Anti-Federalists were the two main factions in the debate over the ratification of the U.S. Constitution in the late 18th century. Federalists, including figures like Alexander Hamilton and James Madison, advocated for a strong central government and supported the Constitution as a means to unify the states and maintain order. In contrast, Anti-Federalists, such as Patrick Henry and George Mason, opposed the Constitution fearing it would create a powerful central authority that could threaten individual liberties and state sovereignty. This debate ultimately led to the addition of the Bill of Rights to address concerns about protecting individual freedoms.
The Anti-Federalist lost due to the fact that they were unorganized.
The issue that divided them was that the federalist were in favor of a strong central government while the anti federalists were opposed to it.
The Federalist vs. Anti-Federalist debate created a foundational dialogue about the balance of power between the federal government and the states. Federalists advocated for a strong central government to ensure stability and unity, while Anti-Federalists feared that such power would threaten individual liberties and state sovereignty. This debate ultimately led to the inclusion of the Bill of Rights in the Constitution, addressing Anti-Federalist concerns and establishing protections for individual freedoms. It also laid the groundwork for ongoing discussions about federalism and governance in the United States.
John Smilie is an Anti-Federalist
anti federalist are people who are against the constitution and federalist are people who want the constitution
the anti-federalist party
There were two sides to the Great Debate: the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists wanted to ratify the Constitution, the Anti-Federalists did not.
There were two sides to the Great Debate: the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists wanted to ratify the Constitution, the Anti-Federalists did not.
There was a debate on how the Constitution should be written. The Establishment Party (Federalists) wanted the constitution without a Bill of Rights. The Anti-Establishment Party (Anti-Federalists) wanted the Bill of Rights installed into it. These two factions evolved into the Federalist Party and Democratic-Republican Party.
The Anti-Federalist lost due to the fact that they were unorganized.
The issue that divided them was that the federalist were in favor of a strong central government while the anti federalists were opposed to it.
The back up generator behind the white house.
The Federalist Papers (and Anti-Federalist Papers) were addressed to the people of New York, where the constitutional debate was particularly fierce.
The Federalist vs. Anti-Federalist debate created a foundational dialogue about the balance of power between the federal government and the states. Federalists advocated for a strong central government to ensure stability and unity, while Anti-Federalists feared that such power would threaten individual liberties and state sovereignty. This debate ultimately led to the inclusion of the Bill of Rights in the Constitution, addressing Anti-Federalist concerns and establishing protections for individual freedoms. It also laid the groundwork for ongoing discussions about federalism and governance in the United States.
BEST ANSWERthe winner is obamaeven though mccain is my voter lol the anti federaist they got their Bill of Rights and mccain is my voter too
sorry i dont know im a dumb butt
John Smilie is an Anti-Federalist