The net effect was mixed. For some periods, it stalled its expansion - that is while there was actual warfare between contending Roman leaders. In the periods between, the expansion went on apace, particularly in the east, where successively Sulla, Lucullus and Pompey progressively subdued Asia Minor, Syria, Palestine and established new provinces or client kingships.
At their conclusion, it left an autocrat Augustus who allocated the frontier provinces and the legions to himself, and set about limiting expansion and stabilising defendable borders on the Rhine and Danube, and in North Africa, Egypt and Anatolia-Syria-Palestine-Arabia. Within those borders he attempted to establish good and stable government, modifying the settlements of his predecessors by endorsing the client kings or converting troublesome border areas to Roman provinces.
Augustus also had to effect the re-settlement of half a million soldiers after the wars, establishing military colonies throughout the empire, which had a secondary stabilising effect.
The civil wars of the 1st Century BCE actually strengthened the military capability of Rome, so much so that Octavian had to arrange the demobilisation and resettlement of half a million men. These military colonies provided an underlying military capability for the provinces in which they were settled.
Octavian Augustus also adopted a policy of no further expansion, stabilising the empire inside defendable borders and coming to terms with neighbouring peoples, and so began the Pax Romanum - a period of relative stability for the people under its rule.
While there was a severe loss of life and resources, the stable form of government which ensued strengthened it.
Yes, as would be expected.
But in another sense it strengthened it - it brought on a degree of stability and prosperity as more appropriate governance and defeance measures were established to resolve the structural problems which caused the wars - resulting in a degree of stability and prosperity fro two centuries - the Pax Romanum.
They made it stronger. After the war war settled, Augustus strengthened the political and military stability of the Empire, curtailed expansion, and established defensible borders.
Please specify which empire you are referring to.
Romes soilders became less loyal and disiplined
They used the situation to weaken their greatest commercial competitor, the Byzantine Empire.
The tradition which weakened the Carolingian Empire was the partition of the empire among the sons of the emperor. This led to wars between the sons over territory, which was often also joined by other relatives.
You need to answer this question yourself because it is so broad. Find out what the problems were and decide what was not a problem.
jht
Please specify which empire you are referring to.
Please specify which empire you are referring to.
water down, thin out, weaken, adulterate, reduce, diminish, temper, decrease, lessen, diffuse
Barbarians did not weaken the Byzantine Empire. The Byzantine Empire was the eastern half of the Roman Empire that continued to thrive while its western counterpart ceased to exist due to Barbarian conquests. The Byzantine Empire was weakened and conquered by the Turks.
The western Roman Empire was less wealthy and harder to protect from invaders than the eastern Roman Empire
The western Roman Empire was less wealthy and harder to protect from invaders than the eastern Roman Empire
Balkan League
balls
Some synonyms for the word diminished are: Decline Decrease Depreciate Dwindle Ebb Lessen Lower Reduce Shrink Weaken
because the disease would spread through everyone and kill the counrty or the empire off
the roman empire began to weaken
Romes soilders became less loyal and disiplined