Patrick Henry was a staunch critic of the U.S. Constitution, fearing it granted too much power to the federal government at the expense of states' rights and individual liberties. He was particularly concerned about the absence of a Bill of Rights, believing it left citizens vulnerable to government overreach. Henry advocated for greater protections for individual freedoms and was a prominent voice in the push for amendments to safeguard these rights. His opposition reflected a broader apprehension among Anti-Federalists regarding the potential for tyranny under a centralized authority.
He favored a broad interpretation of the Constitution.
The US constitution confers no rights to Americans as citizens. It does however, do so for US citizens.
America's founding fathers also had some framers of the Constitution in their ranks. Most historians agree that the founders and framers of the US Constitution envisaged the treaty making process to be the mutual agreement between US president and the US Senate.
LIBERTY OUGHT to be the dire t end of your government
- not support constitution - was antifederalist then became federalist - failed at business became a lwayer - had 11 or 12 kids all i know.
"Give me liberty or give me death!" oh and next time, try and spell constitution correctly. just a tip
they are in favor of it
they were not in favor of it
That person would have a 'strict' construction view of the Constitution. The other view is termed a 'loose' construction. The loose view believes if the Constitution doesn't prohibit the act (or law) it is okay.
Pronce Henry's school fit navigators us located in Portugal.
The American Constitution doesn't prevent the Death Penalty, which is not the same as supporting.Another View: The US Constitution does not address Capital Punishment anywhere in the document. The only restriction on any type of punishment that is addressed in the Constitution is a prohibition agaionst "cruel and unusual punishment."
Regardless of their view on the U.S. Constitution, officials have to follow the Constitution because it is the supreme law of the land. However, there is a strict and loose interpretation of the Constitution, and modern politics is related to the loose interpretation making it seem like they don't follow it.