The most famously remembered today is Detective Inspector George Aberline although there were other DI's on the case. The case was initially headed by DI Edmund Reid until Aberline was sent in to help along with DI's Henry Moore and Walter Andrews.
After the Eddowes murder, which occurred within the City of London, the City Police under Detective Inspector James McWilliam were also engaged. However, overall direction of the murder enquiries was confused and hampered by the fact that the newly appointed head of the CID, Sir Robert Anderson, was on leave in Switzerland between 7 September and 15 October, during which time Chapman, Stride and Eddowes were killed. This prompted the Chief Commissioner of the Met., Sir Charles Warren, to appoint Superintendent Donald Swanson to coordinate the enquiry from Scotland Yard. Swanson's notes on the case survive and are a valuable record of the investigation.
That case was not closed.
Still unsolved.
2 were doctors
There isn't one. The case has never been solved.
Between the strong circumstantial and DNA evidence present, the chance that Jack The Ripper could have been someone other than Sickert is almost non-existant. Her case is stronger than that of Scott Peterson, an almost completely circumstantial case in California. When her investigation was complete she presented it to John Grieve, head detective from Scotland Yard, his response was, had he worked at the Yard in 1888, he would persue the case at the Old Bailey.
There is a museum that claims to have the knife of Jack The Ripper. If you 'read the fine print' you will find that it is not the knife used by the Ripper. There was never a weapon recovered in this case. In what remains of autopsy reports of the Ripper's victims it can't even be determined as to the exact type and size of the knife used.
Probably not. Jack The Ripper is still unidentified and although it's been over 120 years since hes murders began the case is still officially open and unsolved.
Jack the Ripper was a serial killer active in London's east end beginning in the year 1888. He was never caught nor identified, which leaves the cold case a focal point for theorists and amateur detectives.
The resources available made the difference in the newer invenstigation. At the time of the Jack the ripper murders, organised criminal investigation was in its infancy. The detectives in the Yorkshire Ripper case had the use of computers and all the apparatus of modern technology to help them althought there was some sloppy handling the information gathered. It was through the vigilance of an ordinary beat policeman, not a detective, that Sutcliffe was finally caught, when he checked the registration details of a suspcious-looking car and was challenged by Sutcliffe. This policeman was aware of the information gathered and was on the look out.
Jack the ripper was the first serial killer to reach the media. The world has eyes on him. It was a scandal about the condition the police was at that time. There were no false starts in this case. There was nothing to go on but the remains of the victims. Even today it takes quite some time to catch a murderer on the run, but in the case of Jack the Ripper, there were many aspects police today would not come across.
Jack the Ripper was a serial killer active in London's east end beginning in the year 1888. He was never caught nor identified, which leaves the cold case a focal point for theorists and amateur detectives.
There were several different detectives that worked the Ripper case. As is done in todays murder cases they split the murders between the detectives so everyone gets their share of the work. And remember that at least one of the murders, Katherine Eddows, was in a completely different section of London known as The Mile. This murder was handled by the London Police as opposed to the Metropolitan Police for the other killings. But the detective that is most often associated with Jack The Ripper is Inspector Frederick Abberline. Abberline was a much-commermorated member of the Metropolitan Police and was one of the few who never wrote a book or gave an opinion as to whom he thought the Ripper was. In his memoirs written after his retirement in 1903 he certainly did not go into the case. Maybe more than any of the other detectives that worked these murders, I think the inability to solve the case weighed heavily on Abberline, and most people don't like to talk about what they perceive as a failure. I think it is also telling that with all the rumors and misinformation that surrounded this case, he did not want to add another opinion to add to the confusion.