answersLogoWhite

0

Assuming you are talking about Charles Schenck, he was a leader in the Socialist Party of America and was convicted of printing and distributing leaflets opposing the draft during the war.

The Supreme Court eventually ruled on the case, stating that his actions were not protected by the First Amendment because it was a "clear and present danger" to the US, since the US was fighting in a war and needed men to serve in the military.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Law

In Schenck v. US when did the Supreme Court say speech could be more dangerous to the country?

In Schenck v. United States, the Supreme Court said that speech could be more dangerous to the country when it creates a "clear and present danger" of bringing about harmful or dangerous actions that the government has the right to prevent.


Were other citizens targeted by certain laws during World War 1 if so who?

During World War 1, the Espionage Act and Sedition Act were passed in the United States, which targeted individuals who spoke out against the war effort or government policies. German Americans also faced discrimination and suspicion due to anti-German sentiment during the war.


Name one government law passed during wartime that limited the freedom of speech to protect national security issues?

One government law passed during wartime which limited the freedom of speech to protect national security issues was the Sedition Act of 1918. In order to silence criticism of the United States during World War 1, Congress passed the Sedition Act on the grounds that the government's interest in the war outweighed individuals' rights to freedom of speech.


Why were the Nuremberg trail held?

The Nuremberg Trials were held after World War II to prosecute major war criminals from Nazi Germany. The trials aimed to bring justice to those responsible for horrific acts of aggression and genocide during the war.


How do you use the word Gestapo in a sentence?

(Gestapo is Geheime Staatspolizei -- State Secret Police in Nazi Germany) During World War II, the Gestapo investigated those suspected of treason or disloyalty. The dissenters claimed that the government was using Gestapo tactics to prevent their protests.

Related Questions

What court case restricted freedom of speech during World War 1?

Schenck v. United States


Why did Germany violate a nations neutrality during World War 1?

Serbia


The Schenck v US case happened at the end of which war?

World War I


Did the Japanese violate any human rights during world war 2?

yes they did Random person ;]


Constitutional justification for the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War 2 was similar to the justification of US behavior in the case of?

united states v. schenck


What War was being waged at the time Schenck was arrested?

Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919)Schenck involved a protest of the draft during World War I, fought between 1914 and 1918. Charles T. Schenck was arrested in 1917 and charged under the Espionage Act of 1917, but his case didn't reach the US Supreme Court until 1919, at the conclusion of the War.For more information, see Related Questions, below.


Why was Charles Schenck arrested during World War 1?

Charles Schenck was arrested during World War I for violating the Espionage Act of 1917. He was a socialist who distributed leaflets urging resistance to the military draft, arguing that it violated the Thirteenth Amendment's prohibition against involuntary servitude. His actions were deemed a threat to the draft and national security, leading to his conviction in 1919. The Supreme Court upheld his conviction in Schenck v. United States, ruling that free speech could be limited during wartime if it posed a "clear and present danger."


Why As a result of actions during world war 1 Charles schenck was convicted in court. what did he do that led to the case?

Charles T. Schenck was the secretary of the Socialist Party of America in Philadelphiaduring the First World Warand involved in the 1919 Supreme Court case Schenck v. United States.Schenck had been indicted and tried for distributing 15,000 subversive leaflets to prospective military draftees during World War I. The leaflets urged the potential draftees to refuse to serve, if drafted, on the grounds that military conscription constituted involuntary servitude, which is prohibited by the Thirteenth Amendment. The Federal government held the position that Schenck's actions violated the Espionage Act of 1917.Schenck was convicted, but he appealed to the United States Supreme Court, arguing that the court decision violated his First Amendment rights. However, the Court unanimously upheld his conviction.


Why was Charles schenck sent to court?

Charles Schenck was sent to court for violating the Espionage Act of 1917 by distributing leaflets that encouraged resistance to the draft during World War I. His actions were seen as a threat to the war effort and national security. Schenck argued that his First Amendment rights were being infringed upon, but the Supreme Court ultimately upheld his conviction, emphasizing that free speech does not protect actions that create a "clear and present danger." This case set a significant precedent regarding the limits of free speech during times of national crisis.


Did Germany violate international law in World War I?

Yes Germany Violated international law in world war 1.


Schenck v United States?

(1919) *Congressional War Powers


In Schenck v. US the Supreme Court?

In Schenck v. United States (1919), the Supreme Court upheld the conviction of Charles Schenck for distributing leaflets urging resistance to the draft during World War I. The Court, led by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., established the "clear and present danger" test, ruling that speech can be restricted if it poses a significant threat to national security or public safety. This case marked a pivotal moment in defining the limits of free speech under the First Amendment, particularly in times of war.