answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The twelve signatory nations of the Antarctic Treaty concluded it at Washington, D.C. on December 1, 1959, becoming the "consultative nations" to it. By April 2010, an additional sixteen nations "achieved consultative status". Twenty other nations have "acceded" to the treaty, according them the right and power to attend consultative meetings between consultative nations over Antarctica as observers.

Two clauses from the preamble to the Treaty are instructive:

"The Governments of Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Chile, the French Republic, Japan, New Zealand, Norway, the Union of South Africa, The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the United States of America,

Recognizing that it is in the interest of all mankind that Antarctica shall continue forever to be used exclusively for peaceful purposes and shall not become the scene or object of international discord;

Acknowledging the substantial contributions to scientific knowledge resulting from international cooperation in scientific investigation in Antarctica;

Convinced that the establishment of a firm foundation for the continuation and development of such cooperation on the basis of freedom of scientific investigation in Antarctica as applied during the International Geophysical Year accords with the interests of science and the progress of all mankind;

Convinced also that a treaty ensuring the use of Antarctica for peaceful purposes only and the continuance of international harmony in Antarctica will further the purposes and principles embodied in the Charter of the United Nations;"

These both imply that Antarctica is under international administration, as opposed to being a sovereign territory unto itself.

However, in its Article IV, the Treaty does speak to the extent and nature of territorial claims to Antarctica:

"1. Nothing contained in the present Treaty shall be interpreted as:

(a) a renunciation by any Contracting Party of previously asserted rights of or claims to territorial sovereignty in Antarctica;

(b) a renunciation or diminution by any Contracting Party of any basis of claim to territorial sovereignty in Antarctica which it may have whether as a result of its activities or those of its nationals in Antarctica, or otherwise;

(c) prejudicing the position of any Contracting Party as regards its recognition or nonrecognition of any other State's right of or claim or basis of claim to territorial sovereignty in Antarctica.

2. No acts or activities taking place while the present Treaty is in force shall constitute a basis for asserting, supporting or denying a claim to territorial sovereignty in Antarctica. No new claim, or enlargement of an existing claim, to territorial sovereignty shall be asserted while the present Treaty is in force."

Article IV recognizes the existence, but not necessarily a mutual acceptance of their validity, of antecedent "claims to territorial sovereignty" among the signatory-consultative nations. It also preserves the entirety of those claims as to each nation's sovereign claims. Finally, it denies the status of waiver as accruing to any acts or activities countenanced under by the Treaty.

Article VIII cognizes and recognizes the jurisdictions of the signatory-consultative nations:

"1. In order to facilitate the exercise of their functions under the present Treaty, and without prejudice to the respective positions of the Contracting Parties relating to jurisdiction over all other persons in Antarctica, observers designated under paragraph 1 of Article VII and scientific personnel exchanged under subparagraph 1(b) of Article III of the Treaty, and members of the staffs accompanying any such persons, shall be subject only to the jurisdiction of the Contracting Party of which they are nationals in respect to all acts or omissions occurring while they are in Antarctica for the purpose of exercising their functions.

2. Without prejudice to the provisions of paragraph 1 of this Article, and pending the adoption of measures in pursuance of subparagraph 1(e) of Article IX, the Contracting Parties concerned in any case of dispute with regard to the exercise of jurisdiction in Antarctica shall immediately consult together with a view to reaching a mutually acceptable solution."

By implication, Article VIII recognizes no intrinsic nationality accruing to persons born in, or residing in, Antarctica. Instead, it refers to nationality as deriving from the nation that is a "Contracting Party" remaining a legal quality which accrues to persons born in, or who are, resident in Antarctica.

Those nations retain all aspects of territorial sovereignty except as to military activities (Article I) and specifically as to detonations of nuclear devices or associated activities (Article V). Further, the Treaty could be said to derogate sovereignty from the consultative nations to the extent it requires formal international cooperation prospectively (Article III); free mutual access for observation and inspection to the sovereign territory and territorial airspace of all claimant nations (Article VII); and, a dispute-settlement mechanism among the consultative nations (Article XI).

Thus, the jus soli of the territorial claimant nations extends to those born within the geographic boundaries of the sovereign territorial claims. That is, if you are born within the boundaries of the New Zealand sector, you are a national of New Zealand, etc.

Alternatively, you might accrue nationality through the jus sanguinis. That is, if you are born to parents of a particular nationality, even if not within the territorial boundaries of that nation, you might accrue that citizenship according to relevant law. This would certainly apply to births occurring within the unclaimed territory of Antarctica.

Only a few thousand people, mostly scientists, reside in Antarctica, and an even smaller number of them "winter over" the continent's exceedingly severe winter. However, the operation of both the Antarctic Treaty and the laws of individual claimant nations seem clear as to the law of nationality accruing to those persons born in, or resident in, Antarctica. That is, that there is no independent sovereignty accruing to an "Antarctic nation", thus there is no independent "Antarctic nationality".

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

2d ago

As of now, there is no recognized nationality specific to Antarctica. The continent is designated as a scientific preserve with various countries maintaining research stations there. Individuals living and working in Antarctica usually maintain their original nationality.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is it possible for your nationality to be Antartican?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Law

What is the difference between law of soil and law of blood?

The law of soil, also known as jus soli, grants nationality to individuals based on their place of birth. The law of blood, or jus sanguinis, grants nationality to individuals based on their parents' nationality.


What are difference between domicile and nationality?

Domicile refers to the place where an individual has their permanent residence or intends to make their permanent home, while nationality refers to a person's legal relationship to a particular country, typically as a citizen. Domicile can change based on where a person resides and intends to stay, while nationality is usually determined by factors such as birth, parentage, or naturalization.


What is casey Anthony nationality?

Casey Anthony is a US citizen. She is a resident of the state of Florida.


Why are Pakis bad at driving?

It is inappropriate and unfair to make generalizations about an entire group of people based on nationality. Driving skills vary among individuals regardless of their nationality.


Why is not stating her nationality such sn important issue for Laetitia's mother?

Laetitia's mother likely feels strongly about not disclosing their nationality to avoid potential bias, discrimination, or prejudice. She may want her daughter to be judged solely on her skills, qualities, and character rather than stereotypes associated with their nationality. Additionally, withholding this information could provide Laetitia with the opportunity to define her own identity and not be limited by societal expectations or assumptions.

Related questions

What is the proper adjective for 'Antarctica'?

Antartican


How can get Saudi nationality?

It is not possible for Outsiders to get the Nationality of Saudi


Do people speak Japanese in Antarctica?

It depends on if an Antartican person studied Japanese language or if a Japanese person went to Antartica, but yes, it is possible for someone to speak Japanese in Antartica.


What is the antartican alphabet spoken in?

There is no such thing as an Antarctican alphabet. Antarctica has no native humans.


How do you write hello and goodbye in antartician?

Since there are no native Antarticans, there is no Antartican language.


Is it possible to have a multiple nationality?

Yes you can have dual citizenship.


What is the nationality of the last name Ketschke?

It is unknown which nationality the last name Ketschke originated from. It is possible that the name was altered from its original form.


Is it Possible to change your nationality?

If you can convince the majority of the population to play it, then yes, of course you can.


Is it possible to get French nationality if your grandfather was born in France?

No, because french is his nationality and not his heritage, and therefore is not passed down through different generations. (I think, and this is what has been told to me.)


What nationality is the surname Stradley?

Quite possible of English origin, being a name from an unidentified place.


Can an adopted child take on his adopted parents nationality?

Nationality generally means genetic origin. In this case, the child can take on the national cultures, the name common in the nationality, and otherwise identify with the nationality. However, taking on the parents' nationality isn't totally possible, since nationality has a DNA component. However, if the child's DNA in some ways parallels the DNA of one or both of the parents, then the nationality in the genetic sense already matches. In America in the recent past -- as late as the 1950s -- children were commonly 'paired' physically with adoptive parents so that if the parents wanted to keep the adoption a secret from the child, it would be possible. Today, however, this practice is not so common.


Your forefathers are from Pondicherry that is a former French Colony you live in Malaysia now is it possible for you to acquire French nationality?

no