One example of legal rational authority is a government official following and enforcing laws set out in the constitution or legal framework of a country. This authority is derived from the established rules and regulations of a society, rather than personal characteristics or traditions.
Rational legal authority provides clear rules and guidelines for decision-making, ensuring consistency and predictability in governance. It helps to prevent arbitrary and discriminatory practices by holding leaders accountable to established laws and procedures. Additionally, it fosters a sense of legitimacy and trust among the populace, enhancing the stability of the political system.
"The Three Types of Legitimate Rule" was first introduced by sociologist Max Weber in his work "Economy and Society," published posthumously in 1922. The three types of legitimate rule according to Weber are traditional authority, charismatic authority, and legal-rational authority.
No, medical records are not a source of law. They may be used as evidence in legal proceedings, but they do not have the authority to establish or interpret laws. Legal sources include statutes, regulations, case law, and legal precedent.
An appellate brief is considered a secondary authority because it is a document prepared by one of the parties involved in a legal case, presenting arguments and legal analysis to support their position to the appellate court. It is not a controlling legal authority like statutes or case law.
While it is preferable to cite binding authority, legal encyclopedias and other secondary sources are often used to supplement binding authority, to explain complex concepts, or to make arguments where there is no binding authority.
Legal rational authority is power based according a set of rules. It is also called legal authority. Examples includes presidential powers.
Legal rational authority is power based according a set of rules. It is also called legal authority. Examples includes presidential powers.
Legal rational authority is power based according a set of rules. It is also called legal authority. Examples includes presidential powers.
1. Traditional 2.Rational-Legal 3.Charasmatic Authority
Rational-legal authority
Traditional authority is based on longstanding custom and beliefs, with power passed down through generations. Rational-legal authority, on the other hand, is based on established laws and rules, with power derived from one's position in a hierarchical structure. Traditional authority is often seen in traditional societies, while rational-legal authority is characteristic of modern bureaucratic systems.
Max Weber proposed a three-part typology for authority, traditional, rational-legal and charismatic. Traditional authority leads to feudalism. Rational-legal authority leads to bureaucracy. Charismatic authority leads to a personal structure between a leader and his followers.
custom and accepted practice
The author cites Franklin D. Roosevelt as an example of a leader who effectively combined charismatic and rational-legal authority. Roosevelt's charismatic leadership style helped him connect with the American public during challenging times, particularly during the Great Depression and World War II. Simultaneously, his position as president provided him with the rational-legal authority to implement significant policies and reforms. This blend of personal appeal and institutional power allowed him to inspire confidence and drive change.
Rational-legal authority is based on written rules and is considered legitimate because it is deemed fair and agreed upon by the people. This type of authority operates within a framework of established laws and regulations that are adhered to by both the government and the governed.
An example of a legal-rational leader is a democratically elected president, such as Joe Biden in the United States. This type of leader derives authority from established laws and formal rules, rather than personal charisma or tradition. They operate within a legal framework, making decisions based on democratic principles and institutional guidelines. Their legitimacy comes from the electoral process and adherence to the constitution.
An example of persuasive authority is a legal article written by a legal expert that discusses a particular legal issue or interpretation of the law. While persuasive authority is not binding on courts, it can influence judicial decisions and be cited as support for a particular legal argument.