This is a gray situation with many variables.
The best decision is to:
NOTE: I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice.
A fault is where to tectonic plates meet but a fault zone is the area around a fault.
The San Andreas Fault is the fault line is South America.
"A wiring fault" which - depending on the actual behavior of the bad connection - might also be described as "an intermittent fault", "a high resistance fault", or a combination of all three terms. For example: "An intermittent, high resistance wiring fault".
It's a Normal Fault.
facts about fault block mountains
the at fault drivers insurance is obligated to pay for damages the insured caused up to the specified policy limits.
No, the insurance company when settling the claim will have you sign a waiver of damages for their insured before giving you a check.
If you are NOT at fault you have no responsibility and the vehicles insurance company that is at fault must pay all damages and costs including a rental car. If you are at fault it depends on the vehicles insurance policy if it covers alternate drivers.
Most likely, both parties would be equally at fault. Each individual's insurance company should cover any damages to their own vehicles.
Liability coverage covers you if you are found liable or at fault for damages. In the case of auto insurance, for example, this coverage pays for damages you cause in an accident that is you fault. This coverage will NOT cover your car damage, however. Just the other drivers car, medical bills, & other property damage.
Yes. All registered drivers are required to hold liability insurance, which means that if they cause an accident, their insurance will pay for damages to the other peoples' cars. So, if the person does hold the required insurance, and is entirely at fault, your damages will be covered.
Are you saying that you are uninsured, and the drunk was at fault, if simply due to the fact that you were uninsured (and of no fault whatsoever), you have to pay for his vehicle? NO, the ''at fault/negligent" party is liable/responsible for the damages they caused due to their neglience. Subject to any laws in your state barring uninsured drivers/owners from recovery of damage. But just because you are uninsured (if not at fault) you are not responsible for the drunks damages.
State laws vary on at-fault crashes, but if there's clear evidence the other car was at fault in the crash, their insurance should pay for the damages. However, if you have no valid drivers license, that should be amandatory court appearance. If you want to drive, ontain the training and license necessary to do so.
It is the drivers fault. It is commonly called "failure to maintain a proper lookout" And You will not be able to get anything from landowner unless you saw him standing there and throw the object at you.
Absolutely not. They should not even be asking for your drivers license number. The information the other drivers company would need is your insurance companies information and then they hash out all the details. Your record, be it DUI, wreckless driving, etc, does not affect their payment since their insured is at fault.
Anybody involved in an accident. Damages are covered regardless of fault.
Yes. If you were at fault then you are liable for the damages you incurred.