0
What else can I help you with?
Why did other scientists question the theory of plate tectonics?
Other scientists questioned the theory of plate tectonics initially because there was no known mechanism to explain how continents could move. Additionally, some were skeptical of the idea because it challenged the prevailing belief at the time that the Earth's surface was static and immovable.
Although Dalton's atomic theory was rejected at first he used his theory to do what that soon resulted in his theory being accepted by scientists?
Instead of just stating his own personal opinions John Dalton cited evidence to support his atomic theory. The giving of evidence - which could be proved or disproved by others - was what soon resulted in his theory being accepted by scientists.
Does the oceanic plate theory provide evidence for continental drift?
Yes
What was the main counterargument against wegeners evidence?
Many scientists dismissed the theory because it flew in the face of conventional wisdom.
How many people believe in the big bang theory?
It depends, because some might say 'scientists'. But not all scientists believe in this theory. Also, there are those who believe in a similar idea to the Big Bang, but it is not refered to as 'The Big Band Theory.'
How is radioactive dating important for provinding evidence for evolution?
Radioactive dating helps scientists determine the ages of rocks and fossils, which provide a timeline of Earth's history. By comparing the ages of different fossils and rock layers, scientists can trace the evolution of species over time. This timeline of evolution is a key piece of evidence supporting the theory of evolution.
What is the primary source of evidence proposed by scientists to support the theory of an ancient Earth?
The primary source of evidence proposed by scientists to support the theory of an ancient Earth is radiometric dating of rocks and fossils. By measuring the decay of radioactive isotopes within these materials, scientists can estimate their ages and establish a timeline for Earth's history that stretches back billions of years.
What is the theory that all the scientists provided evidence for the cell theory?
For their own benefits.
How do scientist prove a theory?
Scientists prove a theory by conducting experiments, making observations, and collecting data that support the theoretical predictions. Consistent and reproducible results from these experiments provide evidence to support the theory. Additionally, peer review and scrutiny by other scientists help validate the theory.
What theory did this scientist provide evidence for?
Cell Theory
Timeline of the Aryan race?
The Aryan race was something made up by German scientists, which they based off of Darwins theory of Evolution. Therefore it cannot have a timeline.
Who were the two scientists that brought forth supporting evidence to wegener's theory?
me and your mom
When would scientists need to change a theory?
Scientists had made observations that did not fit exactly with Dalton's theory. Scientists changed the atomic theory to include this new knowledge. While the modern atomic theory is based on Dalton's theory, it is also very different.
If new evidence does not support a scientific theory scientists will most likely?
if new evidence doesn't support a scientific theory, scientists will either revise the theory to accommodate the new evidence or discard the theory altogether in favor of a more accurate explanation. This process is crucial for the progress of science as it ensures that theories are continuously tested and refined to reflect our understanding of the natural world.
Why were most scientists disagreeing with Alfred Wegeners continental drift theory?
There was no evidence to prove it
Why was wegener's theory not accepted by all scientists?
Wegner's theory was not accept because he didn't have much evidence to support his theory with and scientists thought that there might have been a land bridge between the continents. Another reason to why his theory was rejected was that he was a foreigner, by that; the scientists didn't really take him seriously.
Do you think it's wise for scientists not to accept a theory immediately even if the theory has a lot of evidence to support it?
Each scientists have there own opinion. Some accept theories and some have to have facts.
