Energy coming to the earth and radioactivity are not same. Energy comes mostly from the sun and other parts of space. The energy of radioactivity is already bound up inside of the atom.
matter. In one of the sciency laws it clearly states that matter is neither created nor destroyed.
The law of conservation of mass clearly states that the mass could not have been destroyed (nor created for that matter). Theresore, when the reaction with air took place, part of the mass of the sucrose would be converted to a gaseous state, and probably a chemical reaciton with the air would create a different compound, and would escape into the atmosphere. hope this answers the question.
I think yes it is because we would observe that during earthquake many buildings are destroyed we knew that this is due to resonance then it clearly states that stones have a frequency
This could be quantified using calculus, but to simply know WHERE it is fastest but not how fast, simple first principals are all that is required - that of conservation of energy. At the low point the pendulum has it's least Potential Energy (PE) - it has fallen as far as it can. As it rises it gains PE, gathering that energy by reducing the Kinetic Energy (energy of motion) of the mass. Clearly the pendulum is traveling fastest at the bottom.
Radioactivity is important for a number of reasons. It is the basis of both nuclear power and nuclear weapons. It allows for such things as medical X-ray examinations. Radioactive decay in the interior of the planet Earth is the source of the heat which causes the mantle to be liquid, and thereby causes continental drift, and earthquakes and volcanoes. None of those would exist without radioactivity. The study of radioactivity has provided scientists with many vital clues about the structure of atoms, and the behavior of subatomic particles.
No because the law of conservation of matter clearly states that matter can NOT be created or destroyed. It can only change it's form.
Rudolf Clausius, a German mathematician and physicist formulated the law of conservation of energy clearly. Though William Rankine mentioned it but he did not formulate it as clearly as Clausius did.
losing control and giving in to instinct
no. the card's text clearly states that the card can't be destroyed by battle
The law of conservation of mass was first clearly formulated by Lavoisier, a french chemist who was beheaded during the french revolution. E = mc2 , derived by Einstien, expresses how mass and energy may be converted. They may be interconverted but not created or destroyed
matter. In one of the sciency laws it clearly states that matter is neither created nor destroyed.
How can you sit there while these poor parrots have their habitats destroyed?
Having clearly defined standards enables organisations and trainees to understand what it is required and to structured training programs to ensure that workers/employees gain the required competencies .
He created the first experiments that proved the Law of Conservation of Mass. These ideas were more clearly formulated in 1789 by Antoine Lavoisier.
It is not posible to give an answer to the question. The shape for which the area is required is unknown. The question gives three measures but they are clearly NOT the sides of a triangle.It is not posible to give an answer to the question. The shape for which the area is required is unknown. The question gives three measures but they are clearly NOT the sides of a triangle.It is not posible to give an answer to the question. The shape for which the area is required is unknown. The question gives three measures but they are clearly NOT the sides of a triangle.It is not posible to give an answer to the question. The shape for which the area is required is unknown. The question gives three measures but they are clearly NOT the sides of a triangle.
This theory was made in 1807 by John Dalton.
He clearly hated the family compact and thus he was a huge supporter of it being destroyed