0
That's a good question given that all three branches have managed to expand the scope of their jurisdiction without any regard for the Constitution that endeavored to keep these three branches balanced and checked. Since all three have gained their newfound and mysterious powers simultaneously I suppose it could be argued there is still a balance the problem is they got rid of all the checks. It's not Chess we are playing any more, it's checkers. King me!
Why checks and balances? Because the very nature of government is to grab power, to rule over subjects and to tax, tax, and tax and then tax some more and when that's been accomplished they'll tax again to pay for all the government employees who worked so hard at collecting the taxes. Under the Constitution of the United States it is the people who have granted a limited amount of power to elected officials and appointed officials for a limited amount of time. Given the power hungry nature of governments it was decided a separation of power into three branches, each equal in power to the other would jealously guard their own power and prevent the other two branches from consolidating their power. Obviously, it never occurred to anyone that the three branches would collude with each other in order to expand the scope of their jurisdiction.
Whether the framers of the Constitution considered this possibility or not, they certainly considered the possibility of tyranny arising out of democracy and wisely enumerated certain rights within the Bill of Rights. There is actually a fourth branch or more technically a zeroth branch which is the people, and no matter what sort of political shenanigans and legal circus our government may try to thrust upon us, our natural rights our ours and no one, not anyone, can ignore that. Just because an administrative agency claims to have jurisdiction doesn't make it true. If it is true then there is credible evidence of that truth by statute or circumstance. It is not the responsibility of our government to keep us from going into error it is the responsibility of all of us to keep our government from going into error.
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
Checks and balances were created to prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful and to ensure that each branch has a way to limit the power of the other branches. This system helps to protect individuals' rights and prevent abuse of power by ensuring that no single branch can dominate the others. Checks and balances also promote cooperation and compromise between branches of government.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How decisions may be taken by non elected officials in a democracy?
Decisions made by non-elected officials in a democracy can be taken through agencies or bodies that are appointed to oversee specific areas such as regulatory agencies or advisory committees. These non-elected officials are often experts in their respective fields and provide recommendations to elected officials who make the final decisions. Transparency, accountability, and checks and balances are essential to ensure that decisions made by non-elected officials align with democratic principles.
How did Madison define pure democracy?
James Madison defined pure democracy as a system in which decisions are made directly by all eligible citizens, without the mediation of elected representatives. He believed that pure democracies could lead to the tyranny of the majority and were prone to chaos, which is why he favored a republican form of government with checks and balances.
What best describes what would have to changes to transform a parliamentary democracy into a representative democracy?
To transform a parliamentary democracy into a representative democracy, changes would need to be made to allow direct election of the head of state (e.g., president) by the citizens, rather than appointment through the parliament. This change would shift the balance of power and make the head of state more independent from the legislature, giving citizens more direct influence over their leadership. Additionally, reforms may be needed to adjust the distribution of powers between the executive and legislative branches to ensure a more balanced system of checks and balances.
Is the afrika borwa 2003 coin made of gold If not what is it made of?
The Afrika Borwa 2003 coin is not made of gold. It is typically made of base metals like copper, nickel, or brass, and then coated with a thin layer of gold for aesthetics.
What year was the electrolux ambassador made?
The Electrolux Ambassador vacuum cleaner was first introduced in 1968 and was produced throughout the 1970s.
Why was checks and balances made?
Checks and balances were made so that no branch of the government gained too much power.
What was the system the founding fathers made that no one branch will get too much power?
checks and balances! next time read your book or actually search the web!
The government of this nation has a system of checks and balances how this works and what impact it has on the way in which laws are made and how the three brancehes involves?
The government of this nation has a system of checks and balances how this works and what impact it has on the way in which laws are made and how the three brancehes involves?
The system of checks and balances was made part of our federal government in order to prevent what?
Complete control by one party
What is one way Congress provides checks and balances over the executive branch?
It has to approve treaties made by the president.
How does the practice of legislative oversight demonstrate the constitutional principle of checks and balances?
Legislative oversight is part of the constitutional principle of checks and balances because it involves the Supreme Court ruling on laws made in lower courts. The purpose of this is to be sure the laws are in keeping with the Constitution.
What was the solutiuon in the constitution when the central government had too much power?
the government made a system of checks and balances to maintain equal power
If the framers had not provided for a system of checks and balances?
A Actually, it is true that the framers made the system of checks and balane as to make sure no branch of govenment succeded the other branches. Then with no one to look after one central ruler, it will turn out to be just like the British Empire that the U.S. tried to get away from.
How can the concepts of separtion of powers and checks and balances be explained?
Separation of power into three branches, the legislative, executive, and judicial, was made to keep one single branch of government from obtaining complete power. These branches have a system of checks and balances which keeps the other in check to limit the powers of the other, that way they obtain stability.
Did the framers want the executive branch to have unlimited power?
No, just the opposite. They didn't want a king so they made sure that there was checks and balances on the branches of government.
What is the balance part in checks and balances can you give examples?
Checks and Balances involves the 3 branches of government and how they monitor one another. Congress establishes a law, sends it to the President - he approves it or vetoes the law and the bill circles back around until it is accepted or dropped. The judicial system overrides and makes sure that laws created abide by the constitution and those in the supreme court are appointed by the president. This is a small part of the ins and outs of checks and balances.
How does separation of powers differ from other constitutional principles?
It was made to prevent each government branch from becoming too powerful. Unlike checks and balances which was created to limit each branch's power.
