0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
The conflict perspective emphasizes on what?
the redistribution of resources.
How did th rise of cities change human society?
With jobs,money and goverment.
What does it mean to redistribute the wealth?
To redistribute wealth means to bring equality to everyone in wealth. To achieve this, the government for example, will tax the wealthy to provide for the poor. That is what it is to redistribute wealth.
What are functionalist perspectives?
"Structural perspective" is an anti oppressive practice termStructural perspectives in social work emphasize that social problems are inherent in the ways in which our society is organized. Unlike traditional social work, which has often individualized both problems and interventions, structural social work focuses on social structures and the ways in which these maintain oppression and privilege. Structural social work recognizes that while radical social change (e.g. redistribution of wealth and resources) is needed, it is also essential to attend to the needs of those who are being marginalized, exploited and harmed in our society as it exists now. A structural social worker may work at a personal level (e.g. with individuals and families) as well as at a political level, but the work will be informed by an analysis of structural power and oppression.
How did social class change human Society?
because now they had a goverment , and that changed the civilization in a huge way
What is the cause of Distribution of wealth?
The redistribution of wealth is aimed at enhancing levels of economic equality.
What is the redistribution of health?
I think you mean redistribution of wealth?Redistribution of wealth is the transfer of income, wealth or property from some individuals to others caused by a social mechanism such as taxation, monetary policies, welfare, nationalization, charity or tort law.[1] Most often it refers to progressive redistribution, from the rich to the poor, although it may also refer to regressive redistribution, from the poor to the rich.[2] The desirability and effects of redistribution are actively debated on ethical and economic grounds.-Wikipedia. :)Basically meaning, the more money you make, the more taxes you pay, because the government is distributing wealth.
Did Karl Marx believe in the concept of redistribution of wealth?
Yes, Karl Marx believed in the redistribution of wealth as a core tenet of his political and economic philosophy. He argued for the redistribution of wealth to address economic inequality and advocated for the abolition of private property in order to create a more equitable society.
Is Redistribution of wealth called stability?
Redistribution of wealth equates to nothing more than the government taking what you earned with your time and sweat and basically giving it away. This isn't fair, it's communism.
What is community finance?
Community finance incolces the redistribution of wealth by the communist overseer.
Why would people with wealth be for redistribution of wealth?
So the sick and elderly don't have to survive on the streets if a financial catastrophe hits their lives.
Does President Obama want redistribution of wealth?
Yes, he has made that clear many times.
Why wealth is not distributed fairly?
The question itself is a false premise since wealth is never "distributed," it is only earned (either by hard work or chance by lottery) or is inherited. There is no central planning office that controls wealth and distributes it. That cannot happen unless there is first confiscation and then it is "redistribution."
What was the name of Huey Long's program to help the poor through the redistribution of money?
Share Our Wealth.
What did members of patrician class do in roman empire?
used their wealth to dominate the goverment of the republic.
How did the crusades accelerate change in Europe?
It brought about a redistribution of wealth and brought a new class of European to the fore front.
Is redistribution of wealth socialism?
That depends on who it is redistributed to. If wealth were redistributed to individuals (say for example to make people's shares more equal), but remained privately owned and controlled by individuals, that would not be socialism. But if it were redistributed to collective ownership in any form, or retained in government ownership, or if its use were controlled by the government despite different assets nominally belonging privately to individuals that would be socialism. Whether the USA needs socialism, and whether socialism goes against human nature, and whether redistributive change is counterproductive to the entire society are questions that are not related to which forms of redistribution are socialist. NOTE: it is well worth paying close attention to the difference between a redistribution of wealth and a redistribution of income.
