What limitations does the domain of this function have?
It would appear that the domain is so very limited that the function may not be seen!
What are limitations of double indicator method?
I know I know!!!! Its my fat juicy coc that you gotta slurp to get the answer.
If x equals 1.5cm and z equals 2.5cm what is the length of y?
The question is underspecified. As it stands, y can have any value.
If the question is, What x 3 equals 15?
Then 5 x 3 = 15
If the question is, What is 15 x 3?
Then 15 x 3 = 45
There are an infinite number of solutions.
Blank1 = 1 and blank2 = 15
B1 = -1 and B2 = -15
B1 = 2 and B2 = 7.5
B1 = 3 and B2 = 5
B1 = 1.1 and B2 = 15/1.1 etc, etc.
What is the factorization of the trinomial -x squared plus 11 x plus 26?
-x2 + 11x + 26 = -(x - 13)(x + 2)
= (13 - x)(x + 2)
= (x - 13)(-x - 2)
Integration by Parts is a special method of integration that is often useful when two functions.
What is the answer to y equals x-15 if x equals 9.4?
y = x - 15. We know x = 9.4
y = 9.4 - 15
y = -5.6
How do you read an x and y graph?
You use dry mix to answer because it means D: Dependant R: Respective and sooo on y:y Axis X:x axis
Unfortunately, limitations of the browser used by Answers.com means that we cannot see most symbols. It is therefore impossible to give a proper answer to your question. Please resubmit your question spelling out the symbols as "plus", "minus", "equals" etc.
Is 2 and 1 a solution to y equals x plus 1?
Yes, since (1,2) satisfies
y = x + 1
y = (1) + 1
y = 2
and
2 = 2
Changing velocty and constant acceleration?
Changing velocity and constant acceleration? Yes.
Changing velocity indicates constant acceleration dv/dt = a constant(k) when v=kt.
Then dv/dt= dkt/dt= k. the constant k can be positive , negative or zero.
The equation for vertical motion is y = v0t + .5at2.
y is vertical displacement
v0 is initial vertical velocity
a is acceleration (in meters, normal gravitational acceleration is about -9.8 m/s/s, assuming positive y is upward displacement and negative y is downward displacement)
E to the power of x SUBTRACT E to the power of -x divided by 2 equals 8 what is x?
(ex-e-x)/2=8
ex-e-x=16
ex = 16-e-x
ln(ex) = ln(16-e-x)
x = ln(16-e-x)
x = ln((16ex-1)/ex)
x = ln(16ex-1) - ln(ex)
x = ln(16ex-1) - x
2x = ln(16ex-1)
e2x = eln(16e^x - 1)
e2x = 16ex-1
e2x-16ex +1 = 0
Consider ex as a whole to be a dummy variable "u". (ex=u) The above can be rewritten as:
u2-16u+1=0
u2-16u=-1
Using completing the square, we can solve this by adding 64 to both sides of the equation (the square of one half of the single-variable coefficient -16):
u2-16u+64=63
From this, we get:
(u-8)2=63
u-8=(+/-)sqrt(63)
u=sqrt(63)+8, u= 8-sqrt(63)
Since earlier we used the substitution u=ex, we must now use the u-values to solve for x.
sqrt(63)+8 = ex
ln(sqrt(63)+8)= ln(ex)
x = ln(sqrt(63)+8) ~ 2.769
8-sqrt(63) = ex
ln(8-sqrt(63)) = ln(ex)
x = ln(8-sqrt(63)) ~ -2.769
So, in the end, x~2.769 and x~-2.769. When backsubbed back into the original problem, this doesn't exactly solve the equation. Using a graphing calculator, the solution to this equation can be found to be approximately x=2.776 by graphing y=ex-e-x and y=16 and using the calculator to find the intersection of the two curves. This is pretty dang close to our calculated value, and rounding issues might account for this difference. The calculator, however, suggests that x~-2.769 is not a valid solution. This makes sense, and in fact it isn't a valid solution if you look at the graphs. This is an extraneous answer.
Factor 2xy plus 4x plus 8y plus 16?
2xy + 4x + 8y + 16
= 2[xy + 2x + 4y + 8]
= 2[x(y + 2) + 4(y + 2)]
= 2(y + 2)(x + 4)
upper right is number one
then upper left is two
lower left is three
lower right is four
think of drawing a C on the grid