Aristotle

Aristotle's contributions in fields such as logic, ethics, politics, and natural sciences have had a profound impact on modern thought and education. His ideas have influenced Western philosophy, science, and politics, shaping various disciplines and providing a foundation for many modern theories and concepts.

Catharsis is a release of pent-up emotions or tension, usually through some form of artistic expression or through talking about one's feelings. It can be a therapeutic process that helps individuals process and cope with difficult experiences or emotions.

Aristotle wrote books on various subjects, such as ethics, metaphysics, politics, logic, and natural science. Some of his notable works include "Nicomachean Ethics," "Physics," "Politics," and "Metaphysics."

No, there is no record of the Greek philosopher Aristotle writing about Atlantis. The story of Atlantis is primarily attributed to the philosopher Plato, who described it in his dialogues "Timaeus" and "Critias." Aristotle was a student of Plato but did not mention Atlantis in his works.

Pleasure proper to tragedy implies that a person who is in pleasure develops a negative attitude towards other people around. HIS approach to life becomes dull and unappealing. Without ups and down of life it is impossible to enjoy.Thus if a person is in constant pleasure This itself is tragedy.

Socrates was a philosopher who challenged traditional beliefs and emphasized critical thinking. Plato was his student who further developed philosophical ideas and founded the Academy, an influential school of thought. Aristotle, a student of Plato, made significant contributions to a wide range of subjects including logic, biology, and ethics, shaping the foundations of Western philosophy. Collectively, their ideas and teachings helped advance knowledge and intellectual growth during the Golden Age of ancient Greece.

Plato and Aristotle might disagree about the TV show "The Good Place." Plato's idealism and focus on the perfection of the Forms might clash with the show's exploration of moral dilemmas and the complexity of human ethics, which align more closely with Aristotle's ethics of virtue and practical reasoning.

yes he was, as was plato. they were killed together

also, if u like mee 079 me!

lool

Aristotle named his book "Nicomachean Ethics" after his son, Nicomachus, as a way to honor him. It is believed that Nicomachus may have either edited or compiled the notes for the book after Aristotle's death.

The generic title for Aristotle's six standard treatises on logic is "Organon."

Because their culture was base on gratifying the image of honor. Such as the American culture is base on gratifying the image by becoming a celebrity either in the classroom or in life. A true tragic hero is to help both who fell in the illusionary images out and those who are out of the illusionary images in through compassion, making him having no life for himself that is tragic, and a teacher thus a hero. @ dan020350

Aristotle had more people believe in his ideas than Democritus. Aristotle's teachings greatly influenced Western philosophy and science, while Democritus's atomic theory was not widely accepted during his time.

Aristotle was not an experimentalist. He based his understanding of the world on observation, and reasoning, and on scholarship, which is to say, familiarity with the opinions of other scholars, but this did not involve experimentation.

Aristotle Onassis had dark brown eyes.

Aristotle believed that comedic heroes are in the middle in terms of intelligence and morality, neither too virtuous nor too evil. They typically have flaws that are not overly destructive, making their mistakes forgivable and allowing for a happy resolution in the end. These heroes often undergo a process of self-discovery and growth throughout the comedic narrative.

Socrates and Plato were both esteemed ancient Greek philosophers. Socrates was known for his Socratic method and questioning of beliefs, while Plato was his student and founder of the Academy. Socrates faced criticism and was ultimately sentenced to death, while Plato continued his teachings and writings, becoming a foundational figure in Western philosophy.

Parmenides, Socrates, Plato, Heraclitus, and Democritus.

Hamartia, in Aristotle's Poetics, refers to the tragic flaw or error in judgment that leads a noble character in a tragedy to their downfall. It is a key element in the plot structure of a tragedy, where the protagonist's hamartia contributes to their eventual downfall or suffering. This flaw typically arises from the character's own actions and decisions, ultimately leading to a reversal of fortune.

Aristotle used the Four Causes to explain an object's transferral from potentiality to actuality. The material cause, formal cause, efficient cause and final cause take something from an idea to reality. They are accurate to a degree but have several flaws and faults.

A problem with the four causes is that they rely on experience. Plato argued that experience was unreliable as it changes from person to person - we cannot be sure that chairs look the same to every person. Also, Aristotle has no concrete evidence that the material world is the source of knowledge - many would turn to religion and faith as the source of truth. However, the Four Causes are derived from Aristotle's reflections on his studies of the natural world so many would agree that they are reliable, including many scientists.

Another benefit to the four causes is that they can be applied to things which already exist. The material cause can be tested and confirmed; 'The chair is made of wood'. The formal cause is also easy to prove - the structure of something can be seen. We can test it. The efficient cause is more confusing as there can be several efficient causes for an object. The carpenter made the chair but a wood cutter cut the tree and a machine sanded the wood. The final cause is obvious in some cases (a chair exists to be sat on) but less so in others - what is the final cause of a person?

There are anomalies which don't conform to the four cause structure. The material cause of a movement or the efficient cause of a coincidence highlight flaws in Aristotle's theory. If things happen by chance or luck then they do not fit into the categories. Emotions also go against the theory as they have no material or formal cause and even their efficient and final causes can be questioned. Is there a final cause for despair?

The fact that there are anomalies does not disprove the theory and this is a major strength to the argument. There is no evidence that it is not true and it doesn't overrule other theories like God or the Big Bang so does not have much opposition. If it could be disproved it would suggest that it was inaccurate but it has not been.

There is no historical evidence to support the idea that Plato had an affair with Socrates. Plato was a student and admirer of Socrates, and their relationship was based on philosophical discussions and mentorship rather than a romantic or sexual relationship.

Tolerance and apathy are the last virtues of a dying society has been falsely attributed to Aristotle over the years. The true Aristotle quote is, difference of race is a cause of faction, until harmony of spirit is reached; for just as any chance multitude of people does not form a state, so a state is not formed in any chance period of time.

Aristotle's contribution to literary criticism is mainly outlined in his work "Poetics." In this text, he defines the key elements of drama, such as plot, character, and spectacle, and discusses their role in creating successful storytelling. He also introduces the concept of catharsis, the purging of emotions through tragedy, which has had a lasting impact on how we understand the effects of literature on audiences.

No, Aristotle is not considered a rationalist. He is known as an empiricist, as he relied on observations and sensory experience to form his philosophical beliefs and theories. Rationalists, on the other hand, believe that knowledge is primarily derived from reason and innate ideas.

Aristotle believed that the modes of persuasion (ethos, pathos, logos) should be used in balance to effectively persuade an audience. Ethos refers to credibility and trustworthiness, pathos to emotional appeal, and logos to logical reasoning. By incorporating all three in a persuasive argument, one can appeal to the audience's reason, emotions, and trust simultaneously.

Alexander, of course, was a very greedy and self centered man, but as you may know, Aristole and Alexander were friends. Friends indeed. So- because of this, maybe he didn't have to say anything inparticular to get him to listen. He just listened to Aristotle. Just because they were friends, and Alexander's close friends were very important to him, not as important as he was to himself, but still close. So, bottoms line is that he didn't say anything. He might have given Alexander a nudge and said, "Dearest Alexander- Wouldn't you listen? I beggeth you.". Hence- him, (Alexander), listening. Good question, overall, but you could have easily found that on Google and not had to wait and read all of this, obviously. Be sure to research things, because I'm sure this is for a project because people whom go on here don't usually come on here just because and ask this scientific philosophy question. I'm sure you aren't an adult, if so, that makes no difference. Thank you for this question, person whom I don't know.