Censorship

It does not directly address censorship.

However, the 1st Amendment's prohibition on restrictions of freedom of speech and press indirectly restrict attempts at censorship.

Thus, indirectly, the US Constitution prohibits censorship except in the case where it can be shown to directly support other competing Consitutional guarranties - such as the National Security exception, where the right of national self-defense is seen to trump free press/speech in certain circumstances, and thus, allow censorship in those cases.

Unless it clearly and provably affects national security, there should be no censorship

by the government. And the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that National Security would be put at risk beforehand.

The Supreme Court's position on prior restraint of the press is that it is unconstitutional. The Supreme Court went on to say it's a very serious issue and a total infringement of the rights of the press under the First Amendment.

cenorship is stupid

In order to encourage and promote the cultural revolution. he convinced students and other followers to destroy the old (china) and initiate a New (china).

Censorship limits freedom by restricting access to information and ideas, which are fundamental to individual autonomy and democratic discourse. It suppresses diverse viewpoints and stifles creativity, preventing people from expressing themselves fully. This control can foster an environment of fear and conformity, undermining critical thinking and personal growth. Ultimately, censorship erodes the foundation of an open society, where free exchange of thoughts is essential for progress.

It began in the late 1960's. It began in the late 1960's.

Restricting information can cause negative affects because the information you do get might be flawed, but also the cost of gathering such information will rise. Prices for everything from commodities to federally backed securities with rise because valuation formulae all involves some form of a risk premium.

Some arguments for censorship are that some things are so disturbing or such a bad influence on people that they should be censored. Some arguments against censorship are that the people making the decisions are deciding what's right for everybody based on their own personal feelings, and also that people have a right to know about the things that affect or interest them.

it is in more shows it is bigger it is on more things that didnt use to be censord and they have blocked out lots of swearing intercourse scences and a lot more violence it is in more shows it is bigger it is on more things that didnt use to be censord and they have blocked out lots of swearing intercourse scences and a lot more violence

what is a tv censorship

Censorship restricts (and therefore violates) freedom of the press and sometimes freedom of speech too. The violation of 'freedom of assembly' and of 'freedom of worship' are usually described using these words and are also serious violations of fundamental rights.

Oh, dude, censorship of a congressman is basically when they get their words or actions restricted or suppressed by some authority. It's like when they say something outrageous on live TV and then suddenly their mic gets cut off. So yeah, it's like a fancy way of saying someone put a lid on their shenanigans.

the arguments for conscription are that if there was no conscription we would not have enough soldiers therefore we would all die..but with conscription there are people that have to go and help.

There were a number of people who helped to end slavery in the United States. They were called "Abolitionists," and they included white people like journalist William Lloyd Garrison, author Harriet Beecher Stowe (she wrote "Uncle Tom's Cabin," about the brutality of a slave's life) and black people like eloquent public speakers (And former slaves) Frederick Douglass and Sojourner Truth. The abolitionists worked hard to win more people over, by speaking all over the country, writing about the horrors of slavery, and making more people aware of how badly slaves were treated.

Gradually, the Abolitionist movement grew, although in the deep south, there was great resistance to ending slavery. Undoubtedly the most important person who helped to stop slavery was President Abraham Lincoln. He signed the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863, and that led to the complete end of slavery by 1865.

Internet censorship is control or suppression of material an individual can publish or access on the Internet. The legal issues are similar to offline censorship. One difference is that national borders are more permeable online: residents of a country that bans certain information can find it on websites hosted outside the country. Conversely, attempts by one government to prevent its citizens from seeing certain material can have the effect of restricting foreigners, because the government may take action against Internet sites anywhere in the world, if they host objectionable material. Total censorship of information on the Internet, however, is very difficult (or impossible) to achieve due to the underlying distributed technology of the Internet. Pseudonymity and data havens (such as Freenet) allow unconditional free speech, as the technology guarantees that material cannot be removed and the author of any information is impossible to link to a physical identity or organization.

fight back

audience is restricted.

FALSE

Because it stop their illegal profitable business.