Censorship

cenorship is stupid

In order to encourage and promote the cultural revolution. he convinced students and other followers to destroy the old (china) and initiate a New (china).

Censorship limits freedom by restricting access to information and ideas, which are fundamental to individual autonomy and democratic discourse. It suppresses diverse viewpoints and stifles creativity, preventing people from expressing themselves fully. This control can foster an environment of fear and conformity, undermining critical thinking and personal growth. Ultimately, censorship erodes the foundation of an open society, where free exchange of thoughts is essential for progress.

It began in the late 1960's. It began in the late 1960's.

Restricting information can cause negative affects because the information you do get might be flawed, but also the cost of gathering such information will rise. Prices for everything from commodities to federally backed securities with rise because valuation formulae all involves some form of a risk premium.

Some arguments for censorship are that some things are so disturbing or such a bad influence on people that they should be censored. Some arguments against censorship are that the people making the decisions are deciding what's right for everybody based on their own personal feelings, and also that people have a right to know about the things that affect or interest them.

it is in more shows it is bigger it is on more things that didnt use to be censord and they have blocked out lots of swearing intercourse scences and a lot more violence it is in more shows it is bigger it is on more things that didnt use to be censord and they have blocked out lots of swearing intercourse scences and a lot more violence

what is a tv censorship

Censorship restricts (and therefore violates) freedom of the press and sometimes freedom of speech too. The violation of 'freedom of assembly' and of 'freedom of worship' are usually described using these words and are also serious violations of fundamental rights.

Oh, dude, censorship of a congressman is basically when they get their words or actions restricted or suppressed by some authority. It's like when they say something outrageous on live TV and then suddenly their mic gets cut off. So yeah, it's like a fancy way of saying someone put a lid on their shenanigans.

the arguments for conscription are that if there was no conscription we would not have enough soldiers therefore we would all die..but with conscription there are people that have to go and help.

There were a number of people who helped to end slavery in the United States. They were called "Abolitionists," and they included white people like journalist William Lloyd Garrison, author Harriet Beecher Stowe (she wrote "Uncle Tom's Cabin," about the brutality of a slave's life) and black people like eloquent public speakers (And former slaves) Frederick Douglass and Sojourner Truth. The abolitionists worked hard to win more people over, by speaking all over the country, writing about the horrors of slavery, and making more people aware of how badly slaves were treated.

Gradually, the Abolitionist movement grew, although in the deep south, there was great resistance to ending slavery. Undoubtedly the most important person who helped to stop slavery was President Abraham Lincoln. He signed the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863, and that led to the complete end of slavery by 1865.

Internet censorship is control or suppression of material an individual can publish or access on the Internet. The legal issues are similar to offline censorship. One difference is that national borders are more permeable online: residents of a country that bans certain information can find it on websites hosted outside the country. Conversely, attempts by one government to prevent its citizens from seeing certain material can have the effect of restricting foreigners, because the government may take action against Internet sites anywhere in the world, if they host objectionable material. Total censorship of information on the Internet, however, is very difficult (or impossible) to achieve due to the underlying distributed technology of the Internet. Pseudonymity and data havens (such as Freenet) allow unconditional free speech, as the technology guarantees that material cannot be removed and the author of any information is impossible to link to a physical identity or organization.

fight back

audience is restricted.

FALSE

Because it stop their illegal profitable business.

Several reasons

1. They genuinely feel censorship will benefit society.

2)They are afraid of truth, different opinions and want full control of any given narrative.

3. They are authoritarian

Censorship is anti-science.

Many people remember the days when the internet young and nothing was censored. There are both pros and cons of internet censorship. Censorship can serve a positive purpose if it restricts offensive, pornographic and violent materials that could be easily viewed by sensitive people or children. The cons are an invasion of privacy, limitations on free speech and freedom of the press. Also, there is always a chance that censorship might be used as a tool of propaganda by governments who have something to hide.

Censorship is a sticky issue with many differing opinions. Some feel that censorship is never fine, but others think that censorship is sometimes needed. Here are some viewpoints on it: No. Censorship should not be pracitced since the free spread of ideas is needed to have a free society. Yes! Censorship should be used wisely but not to completely control society. Censorship helps protect children and those in society. Kiddy porn is disgusting and without Censorship Laws it would be on-going (still is) but they are being caught a lot faster these days as you can see if you watch the news. Censorship can help protect people's children or trusting people from being cheated and used.

Even with technology at its peak in the modern era worldwide it is not possible to censor selectively a part of the program being telecasted and leave the other. What needs to be done is to have a common voting between the younger generation and their parents about the possible goods and also ill-effects of foreign channels. On one hand, channels like Discovery,Animal Planet, Star Sports,etc. provide us with the knowledge and entertainment not ever imparted by an Indian channel while on the other hand there are counter-parts like Fashion TV(still can be knowledgeable for fashion freaks) which are quite bad for kids in their developing age. I think the major topic for discussion should be the right age limit for viewing adult content as otherwise children ride onto such stuff at a much earlier age. So, a common forum should be set up between youngsters and elders on what to watch and at what age. Also, some relaxations should be given to the children. As otherwise, you know what happens(Anxiety Kills The CAT). This thing should always be kept in view. Rest aside, children should be let free to exercise and criticised in a very mild way so as not to let them feel that they are being pulled down or something like that. What I wish to convey here is that stop the children in the best manner possible and do not pressurise them at any stage as that can lead to more damage only.
I am done. Thanks a lot.