Child Support

No, the debt is all his.

No. A legal guardian is appointed by the court to oversee the welfare of a minor until said minor reaches the legal age of majority or the court rescinds the guardian order or the guardian askss to be reieased from the obligation. A legally appointed guardian's custodial powers supercede that of the biological parents. Furthermore, the guardian would need permission from the issuing court to allow the minor to leave the residence for any extended period of time especially if the minor is leaving the state of residency.

Generally, the father's, but you should work together for what's best for the child. Which policy is the better one for being primary? Besides, with two policies, any bills end up fully covered. See links below for each of you.

No, as he has no legal rights to the child even if he sign the certificate himself. You will need to file for custody. see links below.

If you can PROVE that he is using false information for legal reasons then he can and will be arrested for Perjury but as I said this has to be able to be proven.

If you have any kind of proof then by all means submit it to the court, I'm sure your Ex will have the most satisfying look of shock on his face.

There shouldn't be any jail time in a situation such as this - the objective is to ensure that the payments are made, and that has been done.

No. Access rights are a separate issue, and single fathers have no presumed rights to the child. A motion must be filed to establish those rights.

Keeping the money is theft. You will have to pay it back. The money should go to the person who have the kids and if that is none of the parents, both parent have to pay child support to that person.

He may be. It will be determined by a court if he decides to take it up with the state. If you have custody, was there a stipulation regarding child support? If there was a divorce agreement it may state the stipulations regarding support and custody. If the custodial parent is giving up physical custody of the child to the previously non-custodial parent then child support may be changed.

he will have to pay back child support if owed unless mother agrees not to or he will have to pay back support if owed to state like if mother was on state aid,but no he will not have to pay for future support

In Wisconsin, it depends on who has physical placement of the child. It may also depend on who has the higher income of the both parents.

It is possible that even with joint custody you will still have to pay child support to the other parent.

Joint custody simply means both parents have equal rights in making decisions for the well-being of the minor child/children. The person with whom the child resides the majority of the time is the person who generally receives support to be used for the child's needs. If the time is equally divided the court will decide if and how any child support will be allocated, based upon income levels of the parents and the needs of the child.

No. modifications to child support is based on a change in income, or should you become unemployed or disabled.

They might, especially if the State provided Medicaid or other assistance for the child.

No, but you will be obligated to pay child support without any rights. see links below

Yes, but you must go through your state to get it.

In general, child support is a percentage of net income. When calculating support for younger children, support actually ordered and paid for older children is subtracted from net income.

Yes, however it should be adjusted to an amount based on the Worker's Comp payment. This can be done through a joint request to child support enforcement, or you can wait for him to go to court, however it will be retroactive and the overpayment deducted from future payments.

If she has the children. However, it must be against BOTH PARENTS.

That shouldn't be a problem if the father doesn't use drugs. If he is worried that the test will come back positive for illegal drug use, and it dues, then the test has done its job, the children have been saved from an unhealthy and unsafe environment and the court will not award custody.

That shouldn't be a problem if the father doesn't use drugs. If he is worried that the test will come back positive for illegal drug use, and it dues, then the test has done its job, the children have been saved from an unhealthy and unsafe environment and the court will not award custody.

That shouldn't be a problem if the father doesn't use drugs. If he is worried that the test will come back positive for illegal drug use, and it dues, then the test has done its job, the children have been saved from an unhealthy and unsafe environment and the court will not award custody.

That shouldn't be a problem if the father doesn't use drugs. If he is worried that the test will come back positive for illegal drug use, and it dues, then the test has done its job, the children have been saved from an unhealthy and unsafe environment and the court will not award custody.

Michigan has adopted the UCCJEA. What you're asking is, which State should have jurisdiction over custody. The answer is, and will always be Michigan. Decker v. Lyle (2003). www.Floridaslostsecrets.com

children need appropriate equipment basically they are sensitive and their judgment also not all the time perfect ,therefore they might have face so many danger situation. As an example if they want to use heavy thinks which beyond their capacity very easily can be injured.

Is there a penalty for not transferring a UGMA UTMA account to the child when heshe reaches the age of majority?

If you have a good parenting relationship with the ex, discuss the issue with them. You'll need to be certain that the child is not using this as a way to avoid reasonable issues (curfew, schooling, household responsibilities) at his current residence. Set the same expectations. Many states will allow a child over 12 or 13 to choose one home over the other, but you will have to go to court, if you cannot get an agreement from the custodial parent. Don't forget to get some document of your having rights to sign for schooling, medical and so on, and to provide insurance and other of the child's needs. Child support won't automatically be the same, either.

It depends on the State that you are in because every state has its own autonomy, meaning, they set their own laws in areas not affected by the US Constitution. Child support is to cover all the common living expenses. Unless it is an out of the norm expense, and you have joint noncustodial custody, you are not obligated to pay any other expenses...by law. Public interest suggest you help the child. Try not to look at it as helping her / him, but rather for the child. That is a good parent.