Computer Programming

Dijkstra doesn't support negative weight-age, Floyd support negative edges but no negative cycles. Dijkstra running time is v2 and Floyd has v3.Dijkstra is fast compared to Floyd, because only find the shortest path for single node. FloydSlow as compared to Dijkstra.

Well, actually people who are good at math are usually pretty good at programming. Programming involves one creating an "equation" you could call it, to meet requirements. You create code to meet program requirements. It's like creating an formula to solve a problem.

Pascal's Triangle in 1653. Which was also discovered 5 centuries earlier by Chinese mathematician Yang Hui.

The answer depends on syllabus for WHAT!

2 3 5 7 11 13 17 19 23 29 31 37 41 43 47 53 59 61 67 71 73 79 83 89 97 101 103 107 109 113 127 131 137 139 149 151 157 163 167 173 179 181 191 193 197 199

Usually a formula.

No.

eg 0.1 is non terminating in binary and so would only ever be an approximation, just like 0.3, 0.33, 0.3333333 are all approximations of 1/3 (which is non terminating when represented as a decimal).

You multiply the diameter by pi

Maybe you mean a bar code?

Isoscales Isoscales

Blaise Pascal was conceived, not invented. He was a person!

pi (3.1415926535897932384626433832795) also pi is infinite

Isosceles triangle- a triangle where two of the sides are the same length.

isosceles

Surface area of a sphere = 4*pi*radius2 square units

In-line functions differ from normal functions by the way they are dealt with by the compiler.

Normally, a function (or its code, more exactly) is stored once within the executable program. A call to this function then results in putting the parameters onto the stack and jumping to the start address of the function. When the function is finished, the stack is freed from the parameters and the program continues right after the point from where it has jumped to the function.

For an in-line function, its code is stored at any place where it is called. This saves us from the administrative overhead (putting parameters etc. onto the stack and cleaning up at the end) and, thus, reduced computing time. On the other side it enlarges the eecutable.<br>

This leads to some restrictions to inline-functions.

Yes it could be.

It would be interpreted as 7 x (16 x 16 x16) + 9 x (16 x 16) + 8 x 16 +5

Isosceles

15.71

-317

42

Option Explicit

Dim i,j,var,Flag,n

var=""

n=cint(InputBox("Enter nth Number to check Prime Numbers"))

i = 3

While i <= n

Flag = True

j = 2

While j <= i\2 And Flag

Flag = i Mod j > 0

j = j + 1

Wend

If Flag Then

var = var&" "&i

End If

i = i + 2

Wend

MsgBox("Prime numbers within n numbers "&n&"= : 1" & var)