answersLogoWhite

0

Creation

Whether you believe God created the world or the universe is the result of the Big Bang, ask questions here about the creation of the beautiful and wondrous earth we live on.

2,055 Questions

What are the religious explanations about the creation of the world?

Summed up as short as possible: "God did it."

yep he did it all as you know in the genesis book it says how the world was created for christans but if you research about the other religions it is a whole different thing the stories are soo differnt. but remember that HINDUISM IS THE OLDEST RELIGION!! i rest my case!!

What are non-religious explanations about creation?

Beliefs about creation can be derived from religious belief, philosophical discussion or the evidence of science. The last of these two sources provide what could be called non-religious explanations.

Plato and Aristotle both put forward first cause arguments that said that eveything has a prior cause, until you arrive back at the very first cause, which is the origin of the universe. Since the first cause had to be in some way different to its successors, this line of argument usually came back to some form of religious origin. Even pantheism, a belief system that sees God as equivalent to nature, is still a religious explanation.

The only truly non-religious explanations for creation come from science. At one stage, the universe was thought to be static - a "steady state" - and eternal. It is now recognised that our universe had a beginning, and that all substance originated from a single point. This results in the theory known as the "Big Bang". Some scientists believe that there must have been many "Big Bangs", since the circumstances for one such event could be expected to occur repeatedly across infinite space and time, and that therefore there are many universes in what they term a multiverse. However, the infinite expanse of space means that we will never become aware of other universes.


Isn't Hebrews chapter 11 verse 1 a good reason for keeping Creationism out of science class?

In the U.S., the First Amendment of the Constitution is the reason for keeping creationism out of science class in public school.

There are different sets of rules for private religious schools.

And to answer the question, yes.

Why are the 7 days of creation important?

The seven days of creation are important in religious beliefs because they outline the story of how God created the world in the Book of Genesis. This creation story serves as the foundation for many theological teachings and symbolizes the power and creativity of God. It is also a significant narrative in the Judeo-Christian tradition and provides a framework for understanding the origins of the universe.

Why is the creation story so important?

Because to those who believe in Creation, it is how their life began on earth.

The Torah creation-account, unlike various ancient stories, does not attribute creation to a multitude of warring, flawed deities and their demigod offspring. In addition, the Torah account makes human responsibility foremost, stressing the lesson that the world is not a happy-go-lucky place in which people may cavort unthinkingly; and nor is it a melancholy accident whose existence is ultimately purposeless.

Do Muslims believe in Adam and Eve story and creationism and all of that?

Muslims believe in Quran as God revelation to Prophet Muhammad (peace upon him) and they believe in Quran authenticity and that Quran was not subject to a single letter change over the period from Quran revelation till the Day of Judgment, by God will.
Accordingly, Muslims believe in all what is mentioned in Quran (eg, Quran, chapter 4, verse 1) regarding Adam and Eve story and on how Adam and Eve were created.

See related questions below for more information.

Why do most religions have creation stories?

Creation stories serve to explain the origins of the world, humanity, and the universe. They provide a framework for understanding the purpose and meaning of existence, as well as the relationship between humans and the divine. These stories often play a fundamental role in shaping the beliefs, values, and practices of a religious tradition.

What is a creationist opinion on religion?

Anecdotal evidence is that almost all creationists are Christians. The majority (but not all) of creationist spokespeople appear, from their comments and discussion, to be fundamental Christians.

Sections of the creationist movement in the United States approached the courts, claiming that creationism is not about religion, but is open as to who the creator was. However, they clearly gave no credence to the possibility that the creator god, if he exists, belongs in the Hindu pantheon or perhaps the pagan pantheon, etc. The only logical answer they saw was that the creator god was the Abrahamic God. The court has held that creationism and its offshoot, Intelligent Design, are religious concepts.

Those who identify as, or can be identified as, creationists tend to take a quite literal view of the Bible. Many are 'young-earth' creationists who believe, on biblical evidence, that the earth is only a few thousand years old. Others accept the scientific evidence for the age of the earth and adopt an 'old-earth' creationist view.
For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation

Did God create the world in seven days according to the Islamic creation story?

AnswerThe Quran does not contain a creation account in the same way as the Christian Old Testament does. However, it refers to the Old Testament creation stories, and Islam accepts the Judaic explanation of creation in seven days.

What religions believe in creationism?

Some Christian denominations, such as evangelical and fundamentalist groups, believe in creationism, which asserts that the universe and living beings were created by a deity in their present form as described in religious texts like the Bible. Other religions, such as Islam and Judaism, also have creationist beliefs based on their respective sacred texts.

Does a Jehovah's Witness believe in evolution or creationism?

Jehovah's Witnesses believe in creation as outlined in the bible.

They do not believe in evolution and believe the earth and its lifeforms were created in six ''creative'' days of 7000 solar years each. (Not six 24 hour days). They believe that the universe and the earth itself would have been created millions or even billions of of years ago. But the actual creating of the earth as a habitable planet would have started 48,000 years ago.

Also 4380 years ago they believe that all life would have had to spread around the earth again after Noah's Flood in the year 2370BC.

Do protestant have Creationism v Evolution?

The Roman Catholic Church acknowledges Darwin's theory of Evolution by Natural Selection as the likeliest mechanism for the origins of the diversity of life on earth.

Creationism is a purely Protestant phenomenon: Catholics don't have it, Muslims don't have it, Hindus don't have it, nor Buddhists,

A different Opinion

Creationism is a purely Protestant phenomenon, which is found in some. more fundamental, protestant denominations, especially in the "Bible Belt" of the USA. Roman Catholics don't have it, Muslims don't have it, Hindus don't have it, nor Buddhists, and most Protestants, especially Lutherans, Anglicans, Episcopalians, Methodists and many other denominations. While there are exceptions, they regard evolution as the likeliest mechanism, producing life over millions of years, although they generally believe that God was the creator of everything, and is still working through creation - through the means of science and evolution. ---------------------------------------------- A CHRISTIAN OPINION As a Christian, I read the Bible, and Genesis discusses creation, not evolution. I do believe in the evolution of a species (ex: the horse was originally eohippus) but I do not believe that we can evolve from one species to another. I consider myself a non-denomination Christian as the focus should be on Christ and God's Word, not on human interpretations, however I was raised in a Baptist church. I'm sure there are some who believe in evolution, but a Christian (which includes Protestant and Catholic) or Jew (Genesis is in the old testament) who studies and believes in God's word will acknowledge creation. All of the details are not listed in the Bible, but it is clear that God created humans from His own hand. As to Hindus, Muslims, and Buddhists, they do not follow the Bible, so it is not unusual that they would believe differently. As a sidenote, many intellects, Christian and non-Christian are now embracing the idea of intelligent design due to advances in scientific research which make it harder to keep believing in the theory of evolution. Refer to The Design Revolution by William A. Dembski.

Why the Catholic Church does not teach creationism?

Umm, I think it does.

Catholic AnswerCreationism is the Catholicdoctrine that the soul of each human being is immediately created by God at the moment of conception. The question makes no sense.

More facts about christians?

Christians believe in the life, teachings, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ. They follow the Bible as their sacred text and believe in the concept of salvation through faith in Jesus. Christians vary in their beliefs and practices, but the core tenets include love, forgiveness, and spreading the Gospel.

Are atheists for or against the teaching of creationism v evolution?

'Atheists' are a general grouping, not a specific one.

  • Many have no opinion on the subject, and allow expert opinions to weigh the matter on their behalf.
  • Some refuse the admission of creationism in public education as science (although private education may do what it pleases) because it is inherently unscientific and in many places, illegal to do so. Evolution is accepted because of its scientific support.
  • Others make acceptance for creationism taught in religious classes, which is fair enough.

Why were religions created?

Basic answer; the Pre-Adamite were without spirit of light from the celestial kingdom and the spirit of darkness (Devil) ruled the earth. The creations of God conjoined the two kingdoms so that mankind might now have a loving spirit of light from God. Thus, the belief in, or the knowledge of God started to take place in humans. Ever since Adams expulsion from Paradise, the infected amnesia-tic mankind required written accounts of what occurred. From this, the Hebrew religion started. However, other religions were in existence prior to Adam, yet this is a very deep and complicating subject and requires the knowledge of the secret doctrine of the Bible to understand.

Where can you find the Muslim creation story?

The creation story is mentioned in various places in the Qur'an.

Some say the Qur'an confirms the Big Bang theory of the Universe because it says: "Do they not see that the Universe was one piece of matter, and that God exploded it apart"?

The Muslim creation story is based on the accounts in the Book of Genesis, the first book of the Hebrew and Christian Bibles. There are fragmentary references to this in the Quran but, since the Quran is not a simple narrative, a better overview can be obtained by reading Genesis 1:1-2:4a (the first cration story) and Genesis 2:4b-25 (the second creation story) and understanding that all three religions harmonise these as if they were a single account. Islam does have some different interpretations of these texts, particularly in the story about the forbidden fruit in Genesis chapter 3, so it will be necessary to return to Islamic sources for an understanding of these differences.

Which came first Jesus or evolution?

According to the Bible, God always was. Which means he never had a beginning, OR an end, he just was. If you believe in God, you dont believe in evolution. We believe in adaptation, but not evolution. And if you believe in evolution, you dont generally believe in Jesus. Therefore, i believe that God came first.

ANSWER:

The answer can vary depending on exactly how you are using the terms "Jesus" and "evolution".

If by "Jesus" you mean the Son of God then, since He is eternal with the Father and the Holy Spirit, Jesus came first.

If by Jesus you mean the man Jesus of Nazareth whom the Son became and by evolution you mean the process by which life developed, then evolution came first.

If you mean Jesus the man and evolution the theory developed by Charles Darwin then, since Jesus lived over eighteen hundred years before Darwin, Jesus came first.

What is the creation story for any religon?

For example, in Christianity, the creation story is outlined in the Book of Genesis in the Bible. It describes how God created the world in six days, culminating in the creation of humans, Adam and Eve, who were made in God's image and given dominion over the Earth.

Who is kent hovind?

Kent Hovind is a self-described "Creation Scientist."

An ultra-conservative Christian and former science teacher, he lectures on his beliefs of Creationism as well as the Hovind Theory, which entails everything from the story of how we got here to what made the mountains and oceans and where did the dinosaurs go?

Due to tax fraud, Kent Hovind was brought to court many times. After lying several times under oath, the jury found him guilty on all 55 charges brought against him and he was sentenced to 10 years in prison, as well as various fines. His wife was sentenced to one year in prison and more fines.

He has a website: http://www.drdino.com/

And is on Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_Hovind

What are the religious responses to evolution?

Religious responses to the science of evolution are varied. The Dalai Lama has said that just as Buddhism searches for the truth, so does science, and if Buddhism needs to adapt to new scientific theories then it will. At the other extreme, biblical literalists continue to teach that the world is too young for evolution to have occurred. Although the Christian Churches were almost unanimous in condemning Darwin's Theory, this has since changed and some of the modern Christian responses include:

  • The Catholic Church has now reacted favourably. Pope Pius XII stated in his encyclical Humani Generis (1950) that there was no opposition between evolution and the doctrine of the faith and that he considered the doctrine of "evolutionism" a serious hypothesis, worthy of investigation and in-depth study equal to that of the opposing hypothesis; Pope John Paul II, in an address to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences (1996), said that new knowledge has led to the recognition of the theory of evolution as more than a hypothesis; Pope Benedict has refused to endorse "intelligent design" theories, instead backing "theistic evolution" which considers that God created life through evolution with no clash between religion and science.
  • The Episcopal Church has said that the theory of evolution does not conflict with Christian faith. In 2006, the General Convention affirmed, via Resolution A129, that God is creator and added that "the theory of evolution provides a fruitful and unifying scientific explanation for the emergence of life on earth, that many theological interpretations of origins can readily embrace an evolutionary outlook, and that an acceptance of evolution is entirely compatible with an authentic and living Christian faith." The Church encourages the teaching of evolution in schools.
  • The Church of England is considering the possibility of apologising posthumously to Darwin, for its earlier condemnation of his theory
Answer:The religious response to evolution is that evolution is not science, in fact, it contradicts true science. Refer to the chart below.

Creation

Evolution

Cause

God was the Cause

For every effect, there is a cause (observable)

There was not cause - 15 billion years ago for no know reason, the universe exploded itself into existence. Time, chance, and natural process created all things.

The creation of the universe is an effect with no cause (not observable).

Origin

The universe was spoken into existence by God's Word.

Matter cannot be created or destroyed by natural processes (observable).

Began with 'singularity', a tiny infinitely hot and dense point

Matter was created by a natural process (not observable).

Energy

We are devolving

Energy goes from a state of usable energy to less usable energy (observable).

We are evolving

Energy goes from a state of less usable energy to more usable energy (not observable).

Space

Earth created first (day 1)

Stars came afterwards (day 4) with the sun and moon.

Stars formed first

Earth formed afterwards

Earths

Covering

Water

Fire

Time Constraints

6 Days - The creation of the World was FINISHED in six day and is no longer taking place (observable).

Infinite Time - 4.6 billion years ago the earth evolved by natural processes. The world is in a continuous process of creation evolution (not observable).

Quality

Very Good

Primitive, Violent

Planning of

Life

By design

Accident

Origin of

Life

God

Life comes from life (observable), no known exceptions.

Forces of Nature

It is possible for life to come from non-life (not observable).

Time needed

for Life

2 Days (Faith based) - all animal/human life was created on day 5 and 6.

Millions of years (Faith based) - They don't know how it happened but given enough time they BELIEVE it will.

Species

Kind begets kind (observable).

Kind begets some other kind (not observable).

Animal Life

Birds first, then

Reptiles

Reptiles first, then

Birds

Human Life

Man was created on day six

Man is made in the image of God.

3.5 billion years ago life evolved

Humans evolved from ape-like creatures.

Beginning

of Death

After Adam sinned, not a process of creation - it is a product of man's sin.

Always been present, part of the creation process - the means by which man evolves into a higher being.

Cause of

Death

Sin, there was no death before Adam sinned (plant life not included), the breath of life was breathed into animals but not plants.

Natural process, existed from the beginning of life

Spiritual

Death

Both physical and spiritual, you will give an account of your life after you die.

Physical only, no accountability after death.

Sediment Layers,

Canyons

Form rapidly (liquefaction). Witnessed during Mt. St. Helen (observable).

Form slowly. No evidence witnessed (not observable).

Fossil Creation

Catastrophic event, rapid burial in water, (observable).

Buried by dust over long periods of time (not observable).

Marine fossils on

Mountains

Global flood, Genesis account

Rapid 40 day/night event

Springs of the deep broken up

All creation perished

All mountains covered by at least 20 ft.

About 200 legends from cultures all over the world.

Local floods, earth sinking into the ocean and rising again.

No written record or legend

Trees through

layers

Fossilized trees spanning many layers indicates rapid burial by water, observable with Mt. St. Helen. Can be created in one week (observable).

Over many years plant life died, sank into the earth, and coal formed (not observable).

Coal, Oil,

Petrified

Wood

Coal, Oil, Petrified Wood, can all be made in a matter of weeks, (observable).

Coal, Oil, Petrified Wood take millions of years to form (not observable).

Biblical Day

Recognize that the Biblical day means 24 hours and accept it as fact

Hebrew word "Yom", in all cases, means short period of time

defined to be evening and morning

days are distinguished between seasons and years (Genesis 1:14)

God's own word (Exodus 10:11)

writing style of Genesis is narrative, not poetic

genealogy of human race given

Some, recognize that the Biblical day means 24 hours but reject the account as a myth.

Others, interpret the Biblical definition of day to mean millions of years.

Do all Christians believe in creationism?

Creationism is usually associated with a belief that the world was created only a few thousand years ago, much as it is today, and that evolution played no part. This belief is not universally held by all Christians.
Many Christians, while believing that God created the universe at some stage in the past, do accept that the world is billions of years old and that evolution resulted in the development of all living things. Even the Catholic Church has moved towards this position:

  • Pope Pius XII stated in his encyclical Humani Generis (1950) that there was no opposition between evolution and the doctrine of the faith and that he considered the doctrine of "evolutionism" a serious hypothesis, worthy of investigation and in-depth study equal to that of the opposing hypothesis;
  • Pope John Paul II, in an address to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences (1996), said that new knowledge has led to the recognition of the theory of evolution as more than a hypothesis;
  • Pope Benedict has refused to endorse "intelligent design" theories, instead backing "theistic evolution" which considers that God created life through evolution with no clash between religion and science.

For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation

What are the 14 Stations of the Cross and their stories?

Catholic AnswerThe Stations of the Cross are a devotion, used on Fridays, and during Lent (although they may be prayed anytime and carry a plenary indulgence under the usual conditions.from Modern Catholic Dictionary by John A. Hardon, S.J. Doubleday & Co., Inc. Garden City, NY 1980A devotion performed by meditating on the Passion of Christ, successively before fourteen stations of the Cross, normally wooden crosses, attached to the interior walls of a church, although they may be erected anywhere, and may have pictures of representations depicted various scenes from Christ’s Via Crucis as aids to devotion on the traditional stations:1. Jesus Is Condemned to Death2. Jesus Bears His Cross3. Jesus Falls the First Time4. Jesus Meets His Mother5. Jesus is Helped by Simon6. Veronica Wipes the Face of Jesus7. Jesus Falls a Second Time8. Jesus Consoles the Women of Jerusalem9. Jesus Falls a Third Time10. Jesus Is Stripped of His Garments11. Jesus is Nailed to the Cross12. Jesus Dies on the Cross13. Jesus Is Taken Down from the Cross14. Jesus Is Laid in the Tomb. AnswerThis response relates to the current 15 Stations of the Cross, situated along the \\"Via Dolorosa\\" in the Old City of Jerusalem, where the events commemorated took place, with a detailed historical explanation of the Stations following. Today's 15 'Stations of The Cross" in the Old City of Jerusalem:Stn. Event
1 The Trial, Condemnation and Flagellation
2 Jesus Taking up His Cross
3 Jesus falls
4 Jesus meets his Mother
5 Simon of Cyrenia helps Jesus bear His cross
6 Veronica wipes His face
7 Jesus falls a 2nd time
8 The maidens of Jerusalem weep and lament Him
9 Jesus falls a 3rd time
10 Jesus is stripped of His garments and fixed to the cross

11 Jesus is crucified
12 Jesus dies on the cross
13 Jesus is taken down and removed from the cross
14 Jesus is entombed
  • 15 Jesus is risen

Background to 'The Stations of The Cross"According to the Christian Tradition, after Jesus was condemned to death by crucifixion, he was ordered to carry his cross on his back to the site of crucifixions, at Golgotha, otherwise known as Calvary, situated outside the walls of the 2nd Temple City of Jerusalem.
All four Gospels tell of the trial before the High Priest and his being led to Pontius Pilate who, as Roman Governor had sole rights in law for Capital punishment. They describe the events between his being brought to the Praetorium (House of Roman Government) and his crucifixion at Golgotha.
The Roman Catholic church divided the route into its current 14 "Stations of The Cross".
Throughout Christian history, there have been traditions regarding the route to the crucifixion and the events that surrounded it, however, from the 14th Century the tradition has been more concrete on the ground, fixing events to known points of the current Old City of Jerusalem, called the "Route of Christ's Torment", or in Latin, The Via Dolorosa.
The route is strewn with chapels and small churches for its entire length, culminating in the Church of The Holy Sepulchre (tomb) at Golgotha, the site of Crucifixion, death, burial and Resurrection.
Each station describes a specific event deemed significant en the route of "suffering and torment".
Many parishes in Europe held similar Easter traditions of re-enacting the final route of Jesus, and as a natural result of this, the stations in Jerusalem were established primarily as a necessary answer to the needs of pilgrims, seeking to tread in the footsteps of their Lord on his final route.
The development of the route, tying events described in Gospel to actual sites and subsequent construction of the chapels and churches on these sites (stations) has been overseen by the Franciscan Order. Since the expulsion of the Crusaders from the Holy Land, this Order has had an exclusive mandate from the Pope to oversee the safekeeping and development of all Holy Sites in the Holy Land. The order was basically responsible for pioneering the return of Christian pilgrims to the Holy Land from the 14th Century onwards.
Only 3 out of the 14 stations signify events actually mentioned in Gospel, the additional 11 stations are the result of legend and tradition, but developed in order to deepen and dramatize, adding spiritual and emotional depth to the Pilgrims' experience, with emphasis on the suffering, by treading the route.
Most noteworthy of these examples is the 4th Station, where a cross-bearing Jesus meets his mother. It is noteworthy that whilst Christian scripture in John 19:25 mentions Mary's presence at the crucifixion, there is no mention whatever of her presence on the "Route of Torments" prior to this, but has been marked out as a development of the scripture story by the Franciscans.
The rationale behind this is simple, as the role or "greatness" of Mary is not much lower in Catholic tradition, that that of the Son of God Himself, signified for example, in her ascendance to heaven, something worthy only of Jesus and Elijah.
A further example is the story of the 6th Station. Here, Veronika, a 'maiden of Jerusalem', taking pity on the perspiring, suffering Jesus as he strains to carry His Cross towards the hill of Calvary, steps forward and wipes His sweat-covered face with a handkerchief, leaving an imprint of his complete face in the material.
Her name is a direct extrapolation of the event - Vera Icona - meaning "true image" in Latin.
Whilst it is true that the event at this point is absent from Scripture, it can be seen as a development of a mention in Luke 23:27-30, which describes Jesus conversing with the maidens of Jerusalem, who wail and lament as they join the masses following His route, developing into a procession. It is not impossible to then interpret from this mention, that one such girl, taking pity on His pain, decided to do her part to ease it by wiping His brow or His face.
The remaining Stations of the Cross all relate to events specifically mentioned in the gospels as having taken place on that journey.
For example, the 5th Station, where Simon of Cyrenia has to step in and participate in the efforts of Jesus in carrying the Cross.
To summarise the sources of the positioning of the stations, the whereabouts of the beginning and end of the route had to be taken as a given consensus:
v Pontius Pilatus was the Roman Governor of Jerusalem, who lived in Caesarea, which was the Roman administrative centre for Judea. His presence in Jerusalem is easily explained, as the events leading up to the betrayal and subsequent trials and crucifixion take place in the days leading up to the Passover, one of the 3 main "Foot", or Pilgrimage festivals for the Jews. For such a festival, Jerusalem would be inundated with tens to hundreds of thousands of Jewish pilgrims, who would journey to observe the Temple rituals surrounding the festival.
v In order to 'keep tags' on sources of political trouble or disturbances, it would be prudent for the Governor, accompanied by a military force, to take up residence in the Jewish city at such times.
v Caesarea was a mixed pagan-Jewish-Samaritan city, one where a Roman governor, with his own pagan temples and Roman city life, would feel more at home and significantly, safer.
An obvious place to take up residence and establish his government Praetorium for times like this, when the Governor was resident in the city, would be the huge Fortress of Antonia, which King Herod "the Great" had built for the exact purposes of:
- protection of the Temple Mount it was adjacent to;
- positioning on the (then) outer northern walls providing access routes independent of the city streets; and
- as a safe refuge in the event of an insurrection.
v The positioning of the Antonia fortress is a known factor, much of its foundations remained at surface level well into the Middle Ages and would have been either visible, or distinctly known to be at the North West corner of the Temple Mount.
v The final point on the Route of tribulations of Jesus, being the site of Crucifixion and close-by burial is the Golgotha (Calvary), which is situated outside the walls of the 2nd Temple City, as is necessitated by Jewish Law, by which the city was governed, which proscribes emphatically either execution or burial of the dead within the confines of the City Walls. It is also a burial site, as can be seen by an intact 2nd Temple catacomb aside one of the crypts in the Holy Sepulchre Church, traditiinally credited to being the tomb of Joseph of Arimathea.
Upon this basis of two sites seen as unequivocally proven, the Franciscans constructed their route, a route designed to commemorate the events, from the trial, to the conviction, leaving the Praetorium, taking a cross on which to be crucified, carrying it to the site of crucifixion, death on the cross, burial and rising from the dead - all among the most significant and defining events in Christianity.

Background_to_the_tradition_of_the_stations_of_the_cross">v Background to the tradition of the stations of the crossThe Original (Byzantine) Route for Christian pilgrims was:
  1. Mount of Olives
  2. Gethsemane
  3. Peter in Gallicantu
  4. The Citadel (Jaffa Gate)
  5. And from there to the Holy Sepulchre

Over the years the route has been shortened, leading from Gethsemane directly to the "Route of the Agony" and on to the Holy Sepulchre.
It is important to note, that according to research, the "Route of the Agony" is a tradition from the 13th Century. The reason for the alteration of the route was a political change.
About the year 1340, The Ottoman Empire requested assistance from the King of France. The French King, in return, requested to be recognized as "Guardian of the Holy Land".
As a result, the Franciscan Order received land in the Holy places and throughout the Holy Land.
The Franciscans did not find "virgin territory', but rather, the presence of Greek Orthodox Christians from the Greek Patriarchate of Jerusalem.
The tradition of 14 stations developed over the years, in contrast to the Byzantine "Route of the Agony" which was not seen as holy.
The 2nd wall of Jerusalem erected by Herod the Great enlarged the area of the city and included the Fortress of Antonia within it (until then, the fortress had protruded from the North wall of the Temple Mount. Herod died in the year 4 CE and Jesus was born between 4-6 CE. In other words, Jesus living and operating in Jerusalem would have seen Herod's walls (the 1st and 2nd walls). Jesus would not have known the walls built by Agrippa I and Agrippa II, as they were constructed around 44 CE, 11 years after his death.
The Route of the Agony now has a total of 14 stations.
9 of these stations receive mention in the Gospels and 5 more which are not mentioned.
Stations 3,7& 9 are the stations where Jesus falls from the weight and pain of The Cross.
Stations 4 & 6 are additional stations which the New Testament doesn't mention.
The Christian tradition tells that after Jesus is convicted and sentenced to death by crucifixion, He is ordered to load the cross upon which He's to be crucified onto His back and to make his way on foot to the site of crucifixion - Golgotha, which Christian tradition further maintains to be at the site upon which the Holy Sepulchre church is constructed.
The books of the 4 Evangelists which comprise "the Gospel" tell us in the briefest of detail of the story of Jesus from being captured by the guards who accompanied Judas Escariot, the disciple who gave His whereabouts away to them, up until His trial before Pontius Pilate - the ruling Roman Governor of Judea at the time.
Further on, the same Gospels tell the tale of events leading to the Crucifixion and death of Jesus - what transpired between His trial in the Praetorium and His Crucifixion at Golgotha.
On the basis of these related events, told by the Evangelists of the New Testament, the Christians formed, over the generations, a route to describe the last path of Jesus. The_history_of_today's_Via_Dolorosa">v The history of today's Via DolorosaToday, walking the Via Dolorosa is one of the pinnacles of a visit by Christian pilgrims to the Holy Land.
However, bearing in mind that Jerusalem was rebuilt after being almost entirely destroyed in 70 AD, together with the fact that the sites within it were also destroyed and rebuilt many times, it is very difficult to try and reconstruct the historical last path of Jesus.
The procession along the route of the Agony which is walked by Christian pilgrims today, as such, has to be seen as a spiritual procession to identify with the suffering of Jesus, and not as an authentic historical procession.
In ancient times, the concept of the "Via Dolorosa" didn't exist, nor the accepted Stations of the Cross of today, but together with this, pilgrims followed a custom of following the route Jesus took, from Gethsemane or from the Praetorium, the site of his trial by Pontius Pilate, to Golgotha.
At the end of the Byzantine era, it was customary to walk from the Kidron Valley to the church of Peter in Gallicantu on the slope of Mt. Zion (held traditionally to be the house of Caiaphas, the High Priest, where Jesus was imprisoned) then to continue to the Church of St. Sophia (the precise site of which is now unknown) and from there on to Golgotha.
The current route is to a great extent the creation of the Franciscan Order, which from 1342 was appointed by the Holy See as Guardian of the Holy Places in the Holy Land.
The establishment of the sites along the Via Dolorosa was part of the ideology of the Franciscan monks for the "peaceful liberation" of the Holy Places, in contrast to earlier attempts, such as the Crusader conquests, which held up the concept of the liberation of Holy Sites by force of arms.
Not only the route itself, but also the number of its stations has changed from place to place and from period to period in history. The tradition of the current route of the Agony of Jesus in Jerusalem is quite a late one. The Stations of the Cross have changed,including some which bear no mention in Gospel, but are the fruit of later traditions.
William Wey, a 15th century pilgrim, mentions 14 stations, but only 5 of them coincide with Stations accepted today and 7 others are only loosely related to the Route of the Agony - stations such as the gate of the city and of Herod's home.
A book written by Adrichomius in 1584 identifies 12 stations identical to those accepted today.
The beginning of consistent mention of 14 stations was during the 16th Century, but whilst the ritual of 14 stations was reconstructed in European cities at Easter, the same was not true in Jerusalem.
Zuallardo, who published a book on the subject in 1587 in Rome, describes the rituals and prayers at sites within the Church of the Holy Sepulchre which were in Franciscan hands, but did not give the same description of the stations along the Via Dolorosa. He explained that the Muslim Ottoman rulers did not allow the rituals at those sites on route and even forbade stopping at them.
During periods of Muslim rule when the public performance of Christian ritual and prayer was forbidden, a number of places of worship were established within the Holy Sepulchre Church as alternatives for those outside on the route where prayer was forbidden. Part of these places of worship, such as the Jesus' prison cell, or the pillar against which He was flogged, are to be found inside the church of the Sepulchre to this day, in parallel to the sites along the Route of the Agony.
The Via Dolorosa as we know it today was not designed in Jerusalem, but rather began to develop across Europe towards the end of the 17th Century, when bills of absolution (Indulgencies) were given to people who walked the Stations of the Cross in parallel fashion within the churches. The custom was established by the Franciscans who received Papal approval from Pope Innocent XI for the custom and began to set up the stations within their churches.
In 1731, Pope Clement XII enlarged the possibility of receiving a bill of absolution for the Route of the Agony in any church, conditional upon the stations being constructed by the Franciscans. Clement XII also finally determined the number of stations as 14.
Processions of the Route of the Agony take place not only in churches, but at many additional sites. One famous one, for example, to this day is performed by a Franciscan monk every Friday at the Coliseum in Rome.
Since the 14th Century, such a route has been marked in Jerusalem, referred to as the route of the Agony of Christ, or the Route of Christ's Passion, or by its Latin name, the Via Dolorosa, a route marked by small chapels almost along its entire length, signifying the events of the last few hours of the life of Jesus.
Over time, the Christian pilgrim to the Holy Land, used to the traditional procession back in the church courtyard, or along the streets of his home town, naturally sought to re-live the route of the Agony of Christ in Jerusalem, the very city where the actual events took place.
Since that time, the current Via Dolorosa has been designed, developed and constructed, by the Roman Catholic Church since the 14th Century, precisely to provide an answer to that need for the pilgrim.
Some are traditions taken from later interpretations of scripture.
There is no mention in scripture of the falls, but 3 out of the 14 stations are dedicated to them, albeit a repeated act which has its basis in logic. The design of the Stations of the Cross is such that can afford the pilgrim the means of personally experiencing the depth of the suffering of Jesus in His last hours.
As such is the 4th Station, dedicated to the meeting between his mother Mary and Jesus, carrying his cross to his the assigned site of his death. This event has no mention in any of the Gospels, nor in their interpretations, however, insofar as Roman Catholicism raises the status of Mary to one close to that of the Son of God himself, (the Catholic church maintains she too rose to heaven in body and spirit) and furthermore considering that she is specifically mentioned in John, 19:25 as being present at the crucifixion, there is an assumption by the Franciscans that she accompanied him on the Route of the Agony too.
Another example is the event told at the 6th Station, according to which one of the daughters of Jerusalem by the name of Veronica - according to the Franciscans - witnesses Jesus perspiring in the effort of bearing his cross along the route from his trial to his crucifixion, takes out a kerchief and wipes the perspiration from his face. As a result, the actual image of Jesus is imprinted in the kerchief itself. The name Veronica is derived from "Vera Icona", meaning "The real Image" in Latin, which is said to have permeated the kerchief from his perspiration. This event too, has no foundation in scripture, but is derived from mention in Luke 23:27-30 of the daughters of Jerusalem as part of a large crowd mourning and lamenting him in his wake. It's possible, and this is the source for the Franciscans, that one of them in an act of mercy, sought by this small act to reduce his suffering, by wiping the perspiration that had built up on his face.
The rest of the stations relate to actual events described in scripture, such as, for example, the 5th Station, marked as the point where Simon of Cyrenia is forced to help Jesus in carrying the cross.
The route of the Via Dolorosa has been laid out by the Franciscans based on the design of Jerusalem in the 4th decade of the 1st century, taken together with the mention in scripture of the time being a festival of mass-pilgrimage and possible seat of unrest for the Jews, to assume that when Pontius Pilate, (as the Roman Governor of the Privince of Judea and normally resident in Caesarea), would take up residence in his Jerusalem Praetorium, assumed to be by the the fortress of Antonia, thereby determining this site as that of the 1st station, of the trial and conviction of Jesus, continuing on from that point following the route from East to West across the city to the hill of Calvary, the site of the Crucifixion and burial and the last Stations of the Cross in the Holy Sepulchre. The_Via_Dolorosa_in_Scripture">v The Via Dolorosa in ScriptureThe Holy Scripture version of the Via Dolorosa begins at Gethsemane, including only those stations which commemorate events specifically mentioned: Pope John Paul II celebrated this route twice in the Colisseum in Rome, in 1991 and 1994.
The stations are as follows:
Stn. Event
1 Jesus in Gethsemane
2 Jesus is betrayed by Judas Escariot
3 Jesus is convicted by the Sanhedrin (of Herecy)
4 Peter denies Jesus
5 Jesus is convicted by the people
6 Jesus is dressed in Indigo robes and with a crown of thorns
7 Jesus takes up and carries His cross
8 Simon of Cyrenia helps Jesus bear His cross
9 Jesus meets the maidens of Jerusalem
10 Jesus is crucified
11 Jesus speaks to the thief
12 Jesus speaks to His mother
13 Jesus dies on the cross
14 Jesus is entombed The New "Way of the Cross"The latest change that the Catholic Church has adopted and has already been enacted in the Philippines begins at the Last Supper and ends with the resurrection.
The Church has more recently begun to recommend avoiding stations which do not appear in the Gospels and as such, the three falls are reduced to just one. The concept is that the Route of The Agony is a form of personal spiritual guide, such that each community and even each individual may choose which of the parts of the suffering of Jesus they wish to relate to.
The real importance is therefore embedded in personal identification with the suffering of Jesus and meditation upon it.
These stations are as follows:
Stn. Event
1 The Last Supper
2 The Sorrow of Jesus in Gethsemane
3 Jesus in front of the Sanhedrin
4 The flagellation and crowning with a crown of thorns
5 Jesus takes up and carries his cross
6 Jesus falls
7 Simon of Cyrenia helps Jesus bear his cross
8 Jesus meets the maidens of Jerusalem
9 Jesus is nailed to the Cross
10 The thief repents his sins
11 John and Mary with Jesus, below the cross
12 Jesus dies on the cross
13 Jesus is entombed
14 Jesus rises from the dead
15 Other sites on the Route of the Agony

Meaning of sugar skull?

A sugar skull is a traditional decoration used in Mexico during the Day of the Dead (Dia de los Muertos) celebration. It is a representation of a human skull made from sugar or other materials, often adorned with colorful decorations and designs to honor deceased loved ones. Sugar skulls are meant to symbolize the cycle of life and death, and to remember and celebrate those who have passed away.

What is the Ebla creation tablet and what are its implications?

What is known as the creation tablet forms a small part of the discovery of some 15,000 clay tablets dating from 2300 BC. The creation tablet was unearthed along with the others in 1975.

Perhaps the most interesting feature of the tablet is that it follows some of the order of creation found in Genesis 1, as follows: "There was no heaven, Lugo formed it. (Lugo means "the big one" or "the great one") There was no earth, Lugo formed it. There was no sun, Lugo formed it. There was no moon, Lugo formed it.

This account, which pre-dates the Genesis creation account by around 900 years domonstrates that written records of the creation even pre-dated Abraham (born 2161 BC).

In a general sense, the existence of such written records also disproves the documentary assumption that writing was not in wide use in Moses' time so he could not have written Genesis, and so it must be placed much later. This of course does not prove that Moses wrote anything, only that he was in a time period where writing was known (in fact 900 years later) and used and so Moses cannot be excluded as the author of the Pentateuch on these grounds as incorrectly done by the 19th century documentary theorists and those who followed them.