King Arthur

The main idea of the passage from "Morte d'Arthur" by Sir Thomas Malory revolves around themes of chivalry, honor, and the tragic fate of King Arthur and his knights. It explores the complexities of loyalty, betrayal, and the inevitable decline of a noble era, emphasizing the moral dilemmas faced by the characters. Ultimately, it reflects on the ideals of knighthood and the consequences of human actions within the framework of fate and destiny.

Sir Tarquine wishes to kill Sir Launcelot because he sees him as a formidable opponent and wants to prove his own strength and prowess in combat. Additionally, Sir Tarquine harbors a personal vendetta against Sir Launcelot due to past conflicts or perceived slights.

Sir Lancelot represents the ideals of chivalry, bravery, and loyalty in Arthurian legend, but he also embodies the complexities of human emotions and moral dilemmas. His love for Queen Guinevere highlights themes of passion and betrayal, showcasing the tension between duty and desire. Lancelot's inner conflict and ultimate quest for redemption reflect the struggle between personal honor and the expectations of knighthood. Thus, he serves as both a heroic figure and a tragic character, illustrating the multifaceted nature of heroism.

The range of medieval taste in literature, particularly in texts like "Morte d'Arthur," showed a fascination with chivalry, honor, romance, and heroic deeds. These texts often reflected the values and ideals of the time, such as loyalty, bravery, and courtly love. The popularity of stories like "Morte d'Arthur" suggests a widespread interest in tales of adventure, knights, and the Arthurian legend during the medieval period.

The frame story in "Merlin and the Dragons" serves to provide context and set the stage for the main tale by introducing the characters and the setting. It also creates a sense of mystery and intrigue as listeners learn about Merlin's background and how he ended up in the situation he's in. Additionally, the frame story allows for a smooth transition into the main narrative.

They don't know who should be King. Arthur was taken away when he was just born, but later becomes King by pulling the sword from the stone.

King Arthur decides to battle Sir Pellinore primarily to prove his worthiness and establish his authority as the rightful king of England. When Pellinore confronts him during a hunt, Arthur sees the challenge as an opportunity to demonstrate his strength and skill as a knight. Additionally, the encounter serves as a test of his leadership and the legitimacy of his claim to the throne, which is crucial for uniting the fragmented kingdom. Ultimately, this battle symbolizes Arthur's journey toward becoming a legendary ruler.

Book of Taliesin

The legend of King Arthur was not written by a single person with a single agenda. Like all legends, it grew from telling and retelling. Its origin was in the legendary history of the Welsh and Cornish peoples of Britain as contained in books like the Mabinogion. Like all legendary history, these stories created a background and a national identity for the Celtic peoples of Britain. In the eleventh to thirteenth centuries, they were taken up by a number of writers, primarily French, and served to promote the ideals of chivalry and courtly love which were current at the time. Chrétien de Troyes is a good example of this period. In the hands of Sir Thomas Malory, an English knight writing at the end of the fifteenth century after the disastrous Wars of the Roses, the stories were used to discuss the disintegration of society and the collapse of the knightly ideal. The stories lost popularity for centuries, only to be revived in the nineteenth century by such authors as Tennyson and Scott to embody the Romanticism popular at the time. Over the centuries, the King Arthur stories have been told in different ways for different reasons.

The various books and sagas nowhere mention how exactly he came by it, only that it was magical like most of his other weapons and that it was called Pridwen (or, in Celtic, Wynebgwrthucher). If the various writers who made up the stories of king Arthur had thought of inventing a story about the origin of the shield, it would probably have been made by elves or some grizzly old wizard.

Excalibur

he pooed on arthur

Yes :d

The man who pulled the sword out of the stone was Arthur AKA King Arthur. That is how he became King and not Morgan Le Fey.

waterhouse

Bors.

Merlin's disappearance from Camelot is often attributed to a combination of magical and narrative elements in Arthurian legend. In some versions, he is trapped by the enchantress Morgana or chooses to retreat into solitude after foreseeing the tragic downfall of Camelot. His absence signifies the end of an era and the fragility of Arthur's reign, reflecting themes of fate and the consequences of power. Ultimately, Merlin's departure serves as a poignant reminder of the mystical forces at play in the stories of Camelot.