How can an equation have more than one solution?
0 x b = 0 has more than 1 solution. This is because 0x1= 1 and 0x2= 0 does too.
Yes, 3x+4y=10 is a linear equation, because you can move the x over to the other side, and divide by 4 to get y=-3/4x+5/2.
Generally, any equation in the form ax+by=c is a linear equation.
Who is the maker of linear equations?
Anyone can, if they know how to do it.
A linear equation describes a straight line.
Its equation contains an equals sign; + and - signs; positive and negative numbers; and a term having x in it, but not x squared or cubed or to any higher power.
So one could look like this: 5x - 3 = 7x - 12, and by using the rule "add the same to both sides or subtract the same from each side the equation can be rewritten as :
(5x -5x) + -3 +12 = 7x - 5x + (-12 +12 ), turning the ones in the brackets to zero, giving 9 = 2x
So 2x = 9 which means that x = 9/2 = 4.5
What strategies can you use to solve a linear equation such as?
One useful strategy is having started a question to complete it.
What is "a 3b"? Is it a3b? or a+3b? 3ab? I think "a3b" is the following: A is an invertible matrix as is B, we also have that the matrices AB, A2B, A3B and A4B are all invertible, prove A5B is invertible. The problem is the sum of invertible matrices may not be invertible. Consider using the characteristic poly?
2.25!!!!!!!!!
Its so easy!!!!!!!!!!
Just punch in 1.5x1.5 in the calculator!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
How linear equations came in to use?
There are many real life situations in which two variables are related through a linear equation. Some examples from those used in schools:
Temperature in Celsius and Fahrenheit scales
Manufactrunig costs as fixed costs plus unit costs
Cab fares as fixed amount plus distance-related amount
Workmen charges as call out plus hourly rate
How do you find the equation if we have the co-ordinates?
To find a line that goes through two given points first find the slope between the points. (y-y)over (x-x) Then use a formula to find the rest.
I use the slope intercept formula and find "b" the y-intercept.
Let's try one.
(2,7) and (3,10)
7-10=-3
2-3=-1
-3/-1=3 the slope
7=3(2)+b
7=6+b
7-6=b
1=b
SO y=3x+1 is the formula for a line going through (2,7) and (3,10)
Given the initial velocity V, and the angle from the ground A, the total distance travelled X will be: X = 2 V2 cos(A) sin(A) / g
where "g" is the acceleration due to gravity, on earth g is approximately 9.81 m/s2.
You will notice that the mass of the object does not affect the distance traveled. We can derive this by first determining how long the projectile will be in the air. If the initial velocity is V, then the initial vertical velocity is Vsin(A). The vertical velocity will decrease at a rate of 'g' until the vertical velocity reaches zero (known as apogee), and the projectile starts falling down. The time from launch to apogee will be Vsin(A)/g.
The time for the projectile to go up is the same as for the projectile to fall down again, so the total time in the airis 2Vsin(A)/g.
Assuming we neglect friction, the horizontal velocity is Vcos(A) and does not change. The total distance traveled horizontally is the horizontal speed multiplied by the time spend in the air. So X = 2Vsin(A)/g * Vcos(A) = 2V2cos(A)sin(A)/g.
The maximum distance is achived with an angle of 45o. The distance travelled is symmetric around this value, i.e. an angle of 50o will give the same distance as 40o, and an angle of 15owill give the same distance as 75o.
How do you know when an equation has a unique solution?
You know when an equation has a unique solution when there is only one variable in it. (APOLOGIES)
(RESPONSE: the question was categorized under "Linear Algebra". x^2 is non-linear and is thus not allowed, nor are sin x, x^3, log x, 2^x, etc etc. However, you are correct if you consider non-linear equations. Unfortunately, I am not sure there is a method to determine the number of solutions to non-linear equation.)
If there are more than one variable, each variable over the first will be free, and give you infinite solutions - with each additional variable adding another dimension to your solution.
(RESPONSE: See above response with regards to this topic being categorized under "Linear Algebra". My statement is true in Linear Algebra. Furthermore, Row Reduced Echelon Form and augmented matrices are the most fundamental concepts in Linear Algebra. Under normal circumstances, I would agree with you. However, this question was categorized under "Linear Algebra", so I presumed that the person asking the question is a college student.)
In general, you know that a system of equations has a unique solution when the row reduced echelon form of the augmented matrix has a pivot position in every column, except for the right most column which is the solution. If you do not have an augmented matrix, then the RREF will have a pivot position in every column.
Why would you choose Gauss Jordan over Gauss seidel numeric methods?
It will solve the solution "exactly", but will take a very very long time for large matrices.
Gauss Jordan method will require O(n^3) multiplication/divisions and O(n^3) additions and subtractions.
Gauss seidel in reality you may not know when you have reached a solution. So, you may have to define the difference between succesive iterations as a tolerance for error. But, most of the time GS is much prefured in cases of large matrices.
What is another name for the x term of a linear equation?
The domain.
It need not be the "independent variable" since the variables could be interdependent.
The object is at some reference point at time b. The object moves at a constant speed (in a radial direction). Its speed is 1/a units of distance per each unit of time. Equivalently, it takes a units of time to move a unit of distance. The formula gives the time taken to get to a distance of x units from the reference point.
How do you solve this equation x equals one half x subtract 4?
x = .5x - 4.
Get all of the x's on one side:
x - .5x = .5x - .5x -4 ---> .5x = -4
Multiply each side by 2.
x = -8
Will any 4 points on a graph produce a Cubic equation?
Any 4 points in the Cartesian plane determine a unique equation that is of degree at most three (i.e., a "cubic" equation). It is, of course, possible that the 4 points actually lie on a degree two ("quadratic"), a degree one ("linear"), or a degree zero ("constant") equation. However, if the 4 points do not lie on a constant, linear, or quadratic curve, then they will like on a unique cubic curve.
In general, N points will determine a unique curve of degree at most (N-1).
Explain the difference between the domain and the range of a relation?
The domain of a function means:
"what x values are possible?"
The range of a function means:
"what y values are possible?"
This difference is just which variable you care about.
For example:
take the equation y=x^2. this is a simple parabola that you hopefully know. the range is anything greater than or equal to 0 because the graph stays above the axis so y is greater than zero. The domain is all real numbers because no matter what x values you choose, a y value exists.
How the OR addition different from the ordinary addition?
A: OR gates does not perform addition or any other mathematical function but rather makes logical decision on true or false on two [ more] inputs both input are false then the output will be false "0" that is the only premise for an OR gate.
The AND gate perform another logic function such as both [more inputs] must be true "1" for the output to be true/ mathematical calculations are achieved by using binary numbers that a machine [computer] understand
How do you show the direct sum of the image and kernel of the linear operator is the vector space?
Ok, linear algebra isn't my strongest area but I'll have a go (please note that all vectors are in bold, if a mathematical lower case letter is not in bold, assume it to be a scalar unless otherwise indicated).
First, I'm going to assume that you already know how to prove that the kernel and image of a linear operator, say f:U->V where U and V are vector spaces, is a vector subspace of U as this needs to be proved before going on to show that the sum of ker(f) and Im(f) are a vector space.
Now, a vector space must follow the following axioms (here A represents the addition axioms, and M the multiplication axioms):
A1) associativity u+(v+w)=(u+v)+w
A2) commutativity u+v=v+u
A3) identity there exists an element 0 in U such that v+0=v
A4) existence of an inverse for all u in U there exists an element -u in U such that u+(-u)=0
M1) scalar multiplication with respect to vector addition a(u+v)=au+av
M2) scalar multiplication with respect to field addition (a+b)u=au+bu
M3) compatibility of scalar and field multiplication (ab)u=a(bu)
M4) identity 1u=u where 1 is the multiplicative identity
ker(f)={u in U | f(u)=0} (or more strictly, the set of vectors u in U such that Au=0 i.e. ker(f) is the null space of the matrix A), Im(f)={v in V | f(u)=v for some u in U}
Let ker(f)+Im(f) = W. Show W is a vector space i.e. show W satisfies the above axioms.
A1, A2, M1, M2, and M3 are all trivial/simple to prove.
A3: since Im(f) is the set off all v in V obtained from f(u), assume Im(f) = V and as V is a vector space it must have, by definition, an additive identity 0, therefore W also contains 0.
A4: since ker(f) is the null space of the matrix A, f(0)=0. Now assume that f(u)=0 and f(-u)=v, since U is a vector space u+(-u)=0 so f(u+(-u))=f(0)=0 but f(u+(-u))=f(u)+f(-u)=0+vtherefore, 0=0+v which implies v=0, so if u goes to 0 in V, its inverse -u also goes to 0. A similar process for the image shows that if u goes to v then -u goes to -v. (Thanks to Jokes Free4Me for the help with this axiom)
M4: similar to A3 except V, again by definition, must have the multiplicative identity 1 and so also exists in W.
All the axioms are satisfied, therefore W=ker(f)+Im(f) is a vector space. Q.E.D.
Add seven eighths and five sixth?
7/8 + 5/6
Find the least common denominator
8- 8, 16, 24...
6 - 6, 12, 18, 24
24 seems to be the least common denominator
We know that 8x3 = 24 so 7x3=21 and 6x4=24 so 5x4=20 (whatever we do to the denominator, we do to the numerator)
Now the fractions are:
21/24 + 20/24
Add the numerators and keep the denominator of 24 the same.
(21+20)/24 = 41/24 = 1 17/24
Final answer is 1 17/24
How hard is physics if you are excellent at calculus and linear algebra?
That should probably be easy. Try it out to be sure.
When is a linear equation in simplest form?
There are several standard forms; none is really any simpler than the others. Here are two froms commonly used for two variables:
Ax + By + C = 0
This is standard, in a way, since it is common to set the right side of an equation equal to zero. This form is easy to extend to more than two dimensions (variables).
y = mx + b
The slope-intercept form. The equation is solved for "y"; the slope ("m") and the y-intercept ("b") can be read directly from the equation.