Roman Numerals

In Roman numerals, "vXXX" is not a standard or valid notation. Roman numerals follow specific rules and conventions for their notation. Here is a brief explanation of how Roman numerals work:

• I = 1
• V = 5
• X = 10
• L = 50
• C = 100
• D = 500
• M = 1000

When combining these symbols, there are rules such as:

Smaller numbers before larger numbers indicate subtraction (e.g., IV = 4).

Smaller numbers after larger numbers indicate addition (e.g., VI = 6).

The notation "vXXX" does not conform to these rules. Roman numerals are typically written in uppercase letters, and lowercase "v" is not standard.

If we correct the notation to "VXXX", it would represent 5 (V) followed by three tens (XXX), which is:

• V = 5
• XXX = 30

So, "VXXX" would be 5 + 30 = 35.

got a minute

In Arabic numerals, LI represents the number 51. The Arabic numeral system is a positional decimal system, where the value of a digit depends on its position within a number. In this case, L represents 50 and I represents 1, so when combined, LI equals 51.

CXXXXV is not a correctly written Roman numeral. The individual numerals within it are real numerals but according to the rules of writing Roman numerals 'no numeral can be written more than three times in succession.' So, XXXX is not allowed. The numerals you have written add up to 145 and the correct Roman numeral for this is CXLV

The Roman numeral for 50 is L

1438 = MCDXXXVIII

Construction

M = 1000

D = 500

C = 100

CD = 500 - 100 = 400

NB When a smaller valuer letter 'C' is placed to the left of a larger value letter 'D' , it means subtract hence CD = 500 - 100 = 400

X = 10

XXX = 10 + 10 + 10 = 30

V = 5

I = 1

III = 1 + 1 + 1 = 3

Hence 1000 + 400 + 30 + 5 +3 = 1438

NB one(1) is Roman Numerals is a capital letter 'I'. NOT a figure '1' .

Well, friend, the Roman numeral system is not a decimal system like our Arabic numerals. It uses letters like I, V, X, L, C, D, and M to represent numbers. Each letter has a specific value, and by combining them, you can represent different numbers. It's a beautiful and ancient way of counting that has its own unique charm.

"IIV" is not a valid representation in Roman numerals. In Roman numerals, the correct representation of the number 7 is "VII," which is a combination of the symbols for 5 (V) and 2 (II). The subtractive principle in Roman numerals dictates that a smaller numeral before a larger one indicates subtraction, not addition.

Ah, Roman numerals are like little puzzle pieces, aren't they? To write 8.5 in Roman numerals, we can represent 8 as VIII and 0.5 as a half, which is written as a V with a line above it, making it V̅. So, 8.5 in Roman numerals is VIII.V̅.

The Arabic numeral "dcxxxii" represents the number 632 in standard Hindu-Arabic numerals. In this number, "d" represents 500, "c" represents 100, and "x" represents 10. Therefore, when we add these values together (500 + 100 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 1), we get the total value of 632 in Arabic numerals.

Under the accepted convention, XCCMXCIX would be regarded as an invalid numeral.

Roman numerals can be broken down into 13 possible values, which can be combined to form any number from 1 to 3999. The first 7 values are as follows:

I=1

V=5

X=10

L=50

C=100

D=500

M=1000

The accepted convention states that no numeral may be repeated more than 3 times in succession. Thus 3 would be represented by III. However it would be impossible to notate the value 4. Thus the following six combinations are permitted to cater for values that would otherwise be impossible under this convention:

IV=4

IX=9

XL=40

XC=90

CD=400

CM=900

These values are known subtractive pairs. When one small value precedes one large value, we subtract the smaller from the larger. Thus IV is 5-1=4. Although combinations such as IM (1000-1=999) are also possible, the accepted convention does not permit them.

So, breaking the numeral XCCMXCIX down into its component values we get:

xc = 90

cm = 900

xc = 90

ix = 9

While each of these component values are valid by themselves, they are not in descending order. Thus the numeral is considered invalid.

Had each value been in descending order, we would simply add them up. Thus the number could be 1089 (90+900+90+9). However, the accepted convention for 1089 would be written MLXXXIX.

Because the first 90 is followed by a larger value (900), perhaps we are meant to subtract the 90 from the 900? If so, the two 90s cancel each other out and we're left with 909, which would be better written as CMIX.

Even if we ignore the accepted convention, the meaning is ambiguous. So, for both those reasons, the numeral is invalid.

The phrase "Cala a boca e me beija" is in Portuguese and translates to "Shut up and kiss me" in English. The phrase is a command telling someone to be quiet and then kiss the speaker. It is commonly used in a playful or romantic context.

The Roman numerals XLX (-X+L+X = L) would amount to 50.

II = 2

III = 3

IV = 4

V = 5

VI = 6

VII = 7

VIII = 8

IX = 9

X = 10

XI = 11

XII = 12

XIII = 13

XIV = 14

XV = 15

XVI = 16

XVII = 17

XVIII = 18

XIX = 19

NII = This isn't a valid Roman Numeral. The system was based on seven characters, and "N" wasn't one of them.

XIXX = This is incorrect.

It is 2009, since Arabic numerals are the ones we routinely use. However, if you meant to ask about Romannumerals, that would be MMIX.

Under today's rules now governing the Roman numeral system it is DCCCLXXXVIII = 888 and we now considered 999 to be CMXCIX but the ancient Romans would have worked out the equivalent of 999 as DCCCCLXXXXVIIII which can be abridged to IM meaning -1+1000 = 999

IXXIII is not a valid Roman numeral. In Roman numerals, I represents 1, X represents 10, and V represents 5. When a smaller numeral appears before a larger numeral, it is subtracted from the larger numeral. Therefore, the correct representation of 9 followed by 13 in Roman numerals would be IXXIII, which is 9 followed by 13 and not a standard Roman numeral.

Oh, what a lovely question! Roman numerals are like little puzzle pieces that come together to form numbers. In this case, MCMXCI stands for 1991. Each letter represents a different value, and when you put them all together, they create a beautiful numerical masterpiece. Keep exploring and learning, my friend!

In Roman numerals, VIL is not a valid representation. The Roman numeral for 6 is VI (5 + 1), and the Roman numeral for 7 is VII (5 + 1 + 1). Therefore, VIL does not correspond to any standard Roman numeral value.

Oh, what a happy little question! XIVI in Roman numerals represents the number 16. Isn't that just delightful? Remember, every number has its own unique beauty, just like every brushstroke on a canvas.

To write 20,000 in Roman numerals, you would use the Roman numeral for 10,000 (X) twice, which is XX, followed by the Roman numeral for 1,000 (M) twice, which is MM. Therefore, 20,000 in Roman numerals is written as XXMM.

8 18 2012 in Roman numerals is VIII XVIII MMXII. In Roman numerals, "V" represents 5, "X" represents 10, "L" represents 50, "C" represents 100, "D" represents 500, and "M" represents 1000. Therefore, 8 is represented by "VIII" for 5 + 3, 18 is represented by "XVIII" for 10 + 5 + 3, and 2012 is represented by "MMXII" for 1000 + 1000 + 10 + 1 + 1.

Presumably 6 because looking at a clock's numbers horizontally at each tier of numbers each tier of numbers add up to 12 except 6. 12 = 12 11=1 = 12 10+2 = 12 9+3 = 12 8+4 = 12 7+5 = 12 But 6 = 6

Numeral-initial equations refer to mathematical equations where the unknown quantity is represented by a numeral, typically a letter such as x or y. These equations are commonly used in algebra to represent relationships between variables and solve for unknown values. By assigning a numeral to the unknown quantity, we can manipulate the equation using mathematical operations to find the value of the variable.