Socialism

Bureaucratic socialism (also known as "state socialism") is a form of social organization in which ownership and control of the means of production (such as farms and factories) are vested in the state.

They firmly supported capitalism and were against radical labour leaders and ideologies.

42 amendment

Socialism is a society with no profits and no buying and selling. Gods and services are produced to meet human need.

Socialist ideology emerges as a reflection of the class demand of the exploited working masses, who fight against domination by capital, and the socialist system is born of the struggle of the popular masses who are awakened to socialist ideology.

Taft was a conservative Republican who was opposed to socialism.

The division of society into social classes based on who does or does not own property.

The US government is not a socialist government.

A socialist state is a state that is constitutionally dedicated to constructing a socialist economy, and is utilizing its resources toward that end.

Socialism is defined as a system where the means of production are either co-operatively owned or publicly-owned, and the economy is geared toward producing for use rather than for private profit.

The US government is not interested in building socialism or transcending capitalism, and would be incapable of doing such a task on its own even if it wanted to.

the impact of utopian socialism in the third world countries is that, it contributed much to the rise of ideas of equality and liberty also to the ideas of communal ownership of the major means of production

it meets the needs for those unfortunate enough to draw a bad gene from their past gene pool and are not up to par in the know among the many! socialism can also meet the most of all needs ,love for nothing !

Just ask North Korea and Cuba how that is working out. Socialism makes you dependent on the government, and destroys your ambitions.

False! false

Alexander Dubcek

Robert Owens, the founder of Owenism.

the basic productive resources Nova net

Socialism is a product of a long line of philosophy originating in Europe beginning during the Enlightenment. Much of this thought developed in France, although theories were also put forth in Germany, Italy, and Great Britain, among others.

It served as a basis for the theories of Karl Marx and various elements are present in most countries to some degree. Most significantly in northern and western European countries and communist states.

If you are referring to a more specific answer as to why a state might become socialist, the number of factors expands widely. These include education level, poverty, population size, GDP, and general historical factors. There are of course many more variables though.

we as a society never did think it was bad after all patriotism and caring about the standard of life in your country is socialism. having to pay taxes to look after roads ans services is socialism. the problem is that the socialism that wasconsidered bad was the govt money that went the way of lower and middle class people rather then into the coffers of the wealthy politicians and their friends. Now that they have buggered up the worlds economy again they stand hat in hand in front of the national treasuries saying please keep is wealthy so that we can keep throwing scraps your way.

No, it is not very close to communism at least in the way that Karl Marx envisioned both systems. Under socialism, there would be a government that would own and control the means of production and steer the economy. There would be no private ownership of property. Property would be controlled by the state. Under most socialist systems today, many goods and services, such as health care, are provided by the state, but individuals still own their own property. Some socialist regimes are actually more repressive of their people than they were under capitalist systems.

According to Marx, under communism there would be no government at all. It would wither away as being unnecessary. With government gone, the means of production would owned and controlled by everyone. There would be no social class divisions. Members of society would work for the good of the whole society rather than for individual gain. As Marx put it under communism, people would contribute toward the good of the whole according to their abilities and take according to their need.

No, they are different aspects of social and government structure.

Please refer to: http://www.romm.org/soc_com.html

Democratic socialism is ensuring of govermental services and benefits to all citezenry in mostly underdeveloped and rural communities where government services cannot be easily realized on basis of need for those wanting groups and minorities who are usually left out of the democratic system.

any person who rules, guides or inspires others

Thailand is rather capitalist although it has many connections with nearby socialist countries like China, Vietnam etc..

characterstics of socialism

Because he had, had experiences with people on the bottom of the social pit.

The ability of each individual to produce.

Yes: both terms describe a classless society where people just work together for the common good, without rulers or bosses or money.