Verbs

Eager is not a verb and does not have a past tense.

The correct phrase is "has been." "Has been" is the present perfect tense of the verb "to be," used to describe an action that started in the past and is continuing into the present. "As been" is not a standard verb tense construction in English.

noun that are plural in form but singular in meaning

The addition of "d" to a verb typically indicates the past tense in English. For regular verbs, this is done by adding "-ed" to the base form of the verb, while irregular verbs may have different forms in the past tense.

past tense of lie

The past participle of "swear" is "sworn."

The past participle is pointed.

"Among the finalist" is the prepositional phrase in the sentence. It functions as an adverbial phrase, providing more information about the location of Tina and Jen in relation to the finalists.

"Success" is a noun, therefore it has no tense (and NO Past Tense). Maybe you were thinking of "to succeed"? Its Past Tense is "succeeded".

Regular verbs follow a consistent pattern when forming their past tense and past participle. For example, the past tense of "walk" is "walked," and the past participle is also "walked." Another example is "jump," where both the past tense and past participle are "jumped." These verbs do not undergo any changes in their form when moving from present to past tense.

The past perfect tense of "want" is "had wanted".

There are no rules; the irregular ones have been inherited from the old language; there is a list of such verbs and you have to learn them by heart - it's as simple as that! All dictionaries must mention the 2nd and 3rd forms of all irregular verbs. The regular ones add a suffix - ED - to the Short Infinitive (1. the Y preceded by a consonant turns into I before ED; 2. the final consonant is doubled if it is preceded by a short vowel; 3. the verbs ending in E lose it before ED).

The past participle of "mislead" is "misled."

The past tense of the verb "shake" is "shook."

An irregularity in Interlingua would be a word, grammatical rule, or other element that is taken irregularly from the natural languages. If an irregularity is discovered, it is corrected. A few irregularities and corrections occurred early in Interlingua's history.

The past participle form of the word "use" is "used."

ano ang pang pito na rule ng subject verb agreement

I think the two biggest reasons why this hasn't yet been answered is that

500 examples is too many.

I give enough for you to (hopefully) understand the explanations of each term I've given.

Verbs - 'doing'/'action' words. e.g racing, worked, sang, etc

Regular verbs - verb conjoins to language's past tense/participle rules.

ie. an '-ed' suffix in English e.g raised, asked, hoped, etc

Irregular verbs - no set rule. verbs can have a complete, half or even no change at all. e.g do, did, done, be, was/were, been, hit, hits, hit etc.

Other things to Note:

certain verbs can be both regular and irregular e.g lent, lended(?); soaked, soaks, etc.

-but being so does not mean that the same meaning is always retained. (although it can mean that and something else too) capital e.g. "you can't have hanged a picture, though you can have a man."

same e.g "how about hanging that matter up already instead of always being so hung up on it?"

s.e.g2 "hang in there!"

hang, hangs, hung = denoting suspension/in suspension/to suspend; object dangling, fixation, etc

hang, hangs, hanged = execution; death, rid of, don't give up(?), etc

some irregular words can have present/past tense the same as a regular's present/past. (meanings also can differ)

e.g find, finds, found, founded, founded, etc.

WikipediaChambers (UK)Google imagesGoogle defineThe Free DictionaryJoin exampleWordNetGoogleUrban DictionaryAnswers.comrhymezone.comMerriam-Websterto pinyin~translate<>0

wcidfjoguarmpt

Yes, although decision is a noun, its verb form is to decide

Yes. In fact, a sentence must have a direct object in order to have an indirect object. (Note, however, that some consider the subject of a sentence in the passive voice to be an "implicit" indirect object, because it the sentence is changed to the active voice, the subject in the passive voice will often become an indirect object in the active voice.)

Yes but it's the way you diagram. ex.) Ducks quack. that is a simple subject=ducks simple predicate=quack but if you have= The teacher gave us homework. Teacher would be the subject or the complete subject would be, The teacher. the simple predicate would be, gave. the complete predicate would be, gave us homework. (i had a really good grammar teacher this year!)

the subject is bringing a dictionary to class and the predicate ia always a good idea.

No, "always" is used to indicate that something is continuous or unchanging. Since the past tense implies that something has already happened and is completed, it would be contradictory to use past tense after "always."

The past tense of 'separate' is 'separated.' Yes and I like bananas.