A state that has surrendered most of its sovereignty to a more powerful state is often referred to as a "protectorate." In this arrangement, the more powerful state typically assumes control over the protected state's foreign affairs and defense, while the local government retains limited authority over domestic matters. An example of this would be the relationship between the United Kingdom and various territories in the past, such as the British protectorates in the Caribbean or Africa. Another modern example is the relationship between some territories and the United States, like Puerto Rico, which has limited self-governance but is subject to U.S. federal law.
A puppet state is a government that is officially independent but is effectively controlled by a more powerful outside country. The puppet state typically follows the agenda or policies of the controlling state, giving the appearance of sovereignty but lacking true independence.
President
the belief that the constitution should pay more attention to a state's sovereignty than to the national government
Protections of State Sovereignty. PLATO :)
A tribute.
which house of the state legislate is more powerful
the senate house
India has a federal formed government. India is a sovereignty, a democratic republic. It is socialist and secular. Today the Indian central government tends to be more powerful statewide and has become more like a British style parliament.
Yes, it still makes sense to talk about state sovereignty, as it remains a fundamental principle in international relations that defines the authority of a state over its territory and governance. However, the concept has evolved in response to globalization, transnational issues, and the influence of international organizations, which can challenge traditional notions of absolute sovereignty. States increasingly navigate a complex landscape where sovereignty is balanced with obligations to human rights, environmental concerns, and global security. Thus, while state sovereignty is still relevant, it is now often viewed in a more interconnected context.
yes
They are the same in that they are territories (Sudetenland / Crimea respectively) of a weaker state (Czechoslovakia / Ukraine) that border on a much more powerful state (Nazi Germany / Russia) and which have a majority of individuals who ethnically idenify with the more powerful state (Ethnic German Czechoslovaks / Ethnic Russian Ukrainians). The leader of the more powerful country (Nazi Germany / Russia) then acquires this territory for the more powerful country by flexing his military might and hoping for no response from political adversaries.
Two months after Illinois entered the Union, the new Illinois General Assembly decreed, on February 19, 1819 they decided that a state seal should be made. The state motto isn't really the state motto, more as the adopted motto because of the seal.