The Continental Army had the advantage of "Home Court," they knew the land, and they had a lot of local support from the civilians which is very important, and even more so 200 years ago. However, they were mostly poorly trained, fed or even clothed. Suffering from harsh conditions, disease and hunger, they also had very limited supplies of ammunition and weaponry.
The British Army had superior forces, training and weapons. However, their fighting style was not well suited to the way the Continental Army's way of fighting; guerrilla, ragtag style. Also, the British public was not necessarily supportive of the war, which greatly undermined their war effort, and lowered morale amongst their ranks.
In the end, a large proportion of the victory could be attributed to the Yankee's determination, however, geopolitical conditions cannot be overestimated. The Continental Army is sure to have lost if it weren't for the French involvement, which primarily had to do with the fact that they were enemies of the Brits, and had just 25 years previously lost the French-Indian war to them, and of course, to the American Colonists, who at that time were still mostly loyal subjects to the king. In fact, a major precipitation of the war came about because of the taxes which the British levied upon the American people to pay for that war, claiming that the war was to their benefit more than the British people's, so it was their obligation to pay, hence the Boston Tea Party, and then....
It actually depends on what war you are talking about if its the Trogan War you're talking about then Paris and Helen were pretty much the whole reason the war started because 1) Helen ran away with him and 2) Aphrodite was the other reason that it all happened and it wouldn't have happened if she didn't bribe Paris
Ear
One of the advantages of the fur trade for Indians was that the Europeans supplied them with rifles. Fur was in high demand in Europe so Europeans were making a lot of profit. A disadvantage of the fur trade for the Europeans was that they had a lot of conflict with each other. A disadvantage for the Indians was that the Europeans took control over the fur trade.
the compromise was where to put the nations capital and each leader had a different idea for where to put it.
It would still be a trapezoid or trapezium. Only each of its sides would be three-fifths the size of the original trapezium.
What you are asking for is a considerable amount of work in the form of a essay question. That is something you need to do for yourself.
The Union Army had more people in the start of the Civil War, also they has rail roads The Confederacy had better generals and was better at fighting Hoped this helped ;)
advantages and disadvantages of associated with each departmentation
what are advantages & disadvantages of departmentalization by function
Why should a business weigh the advantages and disadvantages of each ownership option ?
Advantages- more money Disadvantages- time away from each other and always going different ways
close each other
they are slow
give me the answer
They are completely different creatures, each has their advantages and disadvantages.
by turning them around.
It depends on what you want to build. Each has advantages and disadvantages.
by turning them around.
opk ;