answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

No. He was way too poor prior to the beginning of the Civil War and didn't believe in it. (Incorrect; see below)

The above answer is absolutely incorrect. It is true that he was too poor to own slaves (due to his own business failures) but he did inherit a slave by the name of William Jones from his father-in-law in 1858. He would manumit Jones one year later. His wife, Julia, did own four slaves herself. She was from a slave holding family.

Grant also ran a slave operated farm in White Haven, Missouri, delegating duties and chores such as chopping firewood and caring after the livestock. Grant often worked alongside the farm's slaves, as was a common practice of "hired help".

There are reference links below.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

Surprisingly. Grant did own some slaves at one time. After Grant left the army, he helped manage his father-in-law's farm near St. Louis, Missouri which used salve labor. Grant's wife inherited some slaves after her father died, and it is my understand that Grant, himself, keep a personal slave as his valet for awhile.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

As he had married Julia, technically they were Grants property after that.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

6y ago

No, he grew up in Ohio. His father was a tanner

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Did US Grant own slaves
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp