He sent a team of soldiers to try to free them, however that mission ended with a disastrous helicopter wreck. Carter then kept his head and tried negotiation, unlike some people who wanted to invade, killing probably tens of thousands of people.
Eventually the hostages were released right after Ronald Reagan became President--possibly the result of some deal between Reagan's team and the Iranians.
He didn't, because it didn't happen.
How did the people of Germany react of the ww1 treaty of versai
How do polish react when the death of their partner occurs
how did the emperor react withe crowds at the gladiator games
How did the celtic people in Britain react to the viking invasion
poopopop
He didn't, because it didn't happen.
Type your answer here... they reacted as they wanted cheeseburgers ha ha ha ha
Human behavior can impact crisis management by influencing response times, decision-making processes, and communication strategies during a crisis. Factors such as stress, emotions, and biases can all play a role in how individuals and organizations react to and handle a crisis situation. Understanding human behavior can help improve crisis management by developing more effective plans and responses that take into account potential behavioral factors.
Most Iranians were willing to accept the Islamic Republic, but they felt that it was not really what they had revolted for. Additionally, the Islamic Republic only came into existence in October 1979 and the US Embassy Hostage Crisis (November 1979) and the Iran-Iraq War (September 1980) quickly became much more engrossing issues for Iranians than the specifics of how they felt about the Iranian Revolution's result.The Shah was an autocrat who supported the general outline of Westernization and his primary in-country opposition was Left-leaning groups (Communists, Socialists, Feminists, Legalists, and Liberals) that believed in increased Human Rights and increased Iranian economic ownership of their natural resources. The type of government that the Left would have created in Iran would have been modern, democratic, egalitarian, and honoring of Human Rights.Obviously the government created by Ayatollah Khomeini had none of those attributes, which depressed many on the Left-leaning opposition groups and made them feel that their revolution had been derailed. The Ayatollah capitalized on internal religious networks in the country that had been developed during the Shah's rule (to circumvent him) and managed to drum up popular support. The Ayatollah now represented a substantial percentage of the population and managed to appear as a kingmaker for whichever Left groups would support him. He had enough power to rewrite constitution-in-progress and effectively create the Islamic Republic.
Yes, it did. OPEC responded with an embargo of the United States (which had sent materiel to Israel in the late stages of that war), which resulted in the 1973 oil crisis.
Not for sure, he could be in a mental crisis or just doesn't know how to react to this situation
Eddie Moxon-Browne is known for his book "Time to React: The Efficiency of International Organizations in Crisis Response." He is an expert in international organizations, crisis management, and peacekeeping operations. His work provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of international responses to crises.
React Native
I can't imagine that Iran would be able get away with [making weapon-grade uranium]. The international community would react quite quickly and probably with military measures. --Shannon Kile, of the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, on Iranian nuclear ambitions.
Midlife can involve a period of self-reflection and reassessment, but it does not necessarily mean a crisis. Some individuals experience a sense of clarity and purpose during this stage, while others may grapple with existential questions. It largely depends on individual circumstances and coping mechanisms.
It does not react