One option is for the male to prove through paternity testing (preferably DNA) that he is not the biological father of the child and then file suit to present the evidence to the court that issued the child support order. Another option would be that the father of the child petition the court for primary custody of the child and if successful request the non custodial mother pay support. Grounds such as the male being mislead concerning the possibility of the female using Birth Control so as not to become pregnant (or some other such scenario) would not be a viable defense for the non support of a biological child.
No. Only the parents support the child, not the step parents. What you make will have no impact on how much he has to pay in child support. Even if you marry this woman that will not change.
In most cases it doesn't really matter how the woman became pregnant. All that matters is if she is going to keep it and if she is going to take care of it personally. If the woman keeps and and assumes custodial rights, then the father should pay child support because he did help create the child and isn't providing for it otherwise. However, if she gives custodial rights to the father, then she should have to pay the child support for the aforementioned reasons.
In 20 years, I've never seen a woman do that. They usually just go on and collect it. Over 30% of men currently paying child support is on children not theirs. see link
No. If the parents are living together the law assumes they taking care of the needs of their minor child/children (at least one would hope that is the case).
To clarify, if you mean a woman has had an affair and become pregnant? If this is the case, and the husband is aware of it, he can order a paternity test to determine if the child is his or not. If it is not, as far as I know, the woman can go after the man who fathered the child for financial support. Support obligations only belong to the actual biological father OR a father who has legally adopted a child. There is a whole moral issue though - if the parents are staying together, does the husband want to alienate this child by not supporting it and how would he live in the same house and not support it? So really it depends on if the couple stays together. If they don't, the husband has NO obligation to support the child.
well he doesnt have a type of woman that he goes for and he wants to fall in love so anythings possible
No, it goes to the state.
In theory the women should now be paying for there percentage of the keep of the child that is no longer living with the women, so yes she should pay child support now.
Ethically, if the child is yours then you pay support. The circumstances are irrelevant.
give her a much support as possible she will need it!!!!
yes...if the father has custody of the child or children then a woman has to pay child support just like a man.
Yes, the issue of a biological father not wanting the woman to bear the child is irrelevant and will not affect his legal obligation to support that child. Both parents of a minor child are legally obligated to financially support that child until he or she reaches the stated age of majority.
the answer is unclear if she is working then yes it does but if she isn't then no unless the child is desabled then you still get child support
if the woman is on ANY type of governmental assistance or if she requests it
Your start paying child support and do so until the child is 18 years old. see links
In order to pay child support there have to be proof you are the father so a DNA test is taken.
I suggest that she contact her State's child support agency. Be polite but persistent. Good luck!