What would you like to do?

Should individual claims of privacy be valued above claims of societal welfare?

already exists.

Would you like to merge this question into it?

already exists as an alternate of this question.

Would you like to make it the primary and merge this question into it?

exists and is an alternate of .

1) Yes personal privacy is one of the greates gifts of the constitution. I prefer privacy over security, however due to the current feelings in the U.S. and it's liberal leanings I doubt that there will ever be true personal privacy again.


2) Another view: One of the founding fathers (Benjamin Franklin) voiced the oft-quoted maxim: One who gives up liberty for security soon has neither.

Privacy is certainly of great value and is protected by various laws and statutes. However, it is not a concept with fixed and never changing parameters. Rather it varies in concept over time and with different perspectives. Therefore, the interpretation of privacy must be consideration a part of a never ending evolution of social perception, and rules relating to privacy -like the US Constitution- by necessity be a "living document".

The concept of privacy is currently being re-thought because identity theft and intellectual property rights are becoming more common. Government has an obligation to protect its citizenry but it also needs to violate citizens privacy in order to control society. The tug-of-war between control and freedom create ever-changing privacy parameters.
While the U.S. Constitution does addres search and siezure laws, grand jury indictments and general rights afforded to citizens of the United States and those who visit the country legally as well as illegally do not confuse these restraints on government as a right to privacy. We have a right to be secure in our papers, the right to practice religion, not to be imposed upon by housing military troops without compensation and a liberty clause that has been very broadly interpreted by courts as a quasi right to personal privacy. But there is no direct mention of outright privacy in the Constitution and those that characterize it as such are giving opinion, not facts.
Thanks for the feedback!

Who claims Tibet as its territory?

  China

What is the maximum recovery amount in small claims court in California?

In California, the maximum recovery amount in a small claims case depends on who is doing the suing and how many other cases the person suing has filed in small claims court.

What are stakeholder claims?

Stakeholder claims are claims or investments that a person or  organization has in a company. Shareholders and creditors can be  stakeholders in a business.

Why is there a move to transmit medical insurance claims electronically?

Transmitting claims electronically is one of the initiatives included in the Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act of 1996, passed by Congress. This process of ele

What country claims Taiwan as a country?

People's Republic of China claims the Taiwan island as a province. However, it is still controlled by the Republic of China.

What is claims Adjudication?

The termination of a claim...this can be by settlement or dismissal. The claims adjudication process consists of receiving a claim from an insured person and then utilizing so

Why is it important to carefully evaluate promotional claims?

It is important to carefully evaluate promotional claims in order  to ensure that the claims are true. Often promotional claims are  exaggerated so it is up to you to check