In which instance? I mean, the guerrillas lost in Malaysia. Their "victory" in Ireland was due more to the British public being war-weary after World War I and a failure of British Intelligence to realize that the Irish Republican Army was on the verge of extinction after the blundered attack on the Customs House in Dublin. EOKA could have been said to have been effective, largely because the British weren't that determined to hold onto Cyprus.
The advantage irregulars have is typically that they know the lay of the land, and they come from the population of that land. Thus, they tend to enjoy more local support and intimacy with the terrain.
Because it caught the british off gard
they used guerrilla warfare
The tactic used was guerrilla warfare.
Guerrilla warfare is basically hit and run under cover, so the Vietcong during the Vietnam war used guerrilla warfare to combat American soldiers. During the US Civil War, the Rebels also used guerrilla warfare.
it was designed as a hit and run tactic not requiring a great many men or supplies.
Guerrilla warfare utilizes sabotage tactics.
The British weren't ready
what was guerrilla warfare
It caught the British off-guard
It caught the British off-guard
Castro's Cuban revolutionaries were one example of the effective use of guerrilla tactics (guerra meaning war in Spanish).
Because it caught the British of guard in the Southern States, where the Americans were most powerful.
Rebels used guerrilla warfare.
In general terms, well led guerillas have been extremely effective against conventional forces.
Sri Lanka
they used guerrilla warfare
they used guerrilla warfare
they used guerrilla warfare