
[Italian quarantina, from quaranta (giorni), forty (days), from Latin quadrāgintā.]
quarantinable quar'an·tin'a·ble adj.For more information on quarantine, visit Britannica.com.
To move an undesired file such as a virus-infected file or spyware to a folder that is not easily accessible by regular file management utilities. The quarantine option is available in antivirus software so that companies can keep a record of which users have been infected, where the file came from and to possibly send the virus to the antivirus vendor for inspection. Spyware blockers quarantine files so that they can be restored if required. See antivirus program, disinfect and spyware blocker.
Download Computer Desktop Encyclopedia to your PC, iPhone or Android.
All laws of quarantine have their origin and basis in the concept of disease transmission by contagion. Quarantine is a term which has been applied to many different systems of disease prevention, but it is generally used in two specific senses: first, it involves the segregation and isolation of individuals, suspected of being infected with a communicable disease, for at least the period of likely incubation; more generally, it refers to the maritime practice of forcibly detaining and segregating all vessels arriving in port, together with the people and things on board, when suspected of certain diseases, for specified periods, usually about forty days. The individuals quarantined may in each case be perfectly healthy, but the suspicion that they are harbouring disease provokes the application of quarantine procedures. The most notorious current practice of quarantine regards the entry of domestic pets and minor livestock into the UK.
The first known law of segregation on account of disease was enacted by the Emperor Justinian in ad 542. The earliest definite regulations against the spread of disease were, however, developed by Italian city states under the threat of bubonic plague in the fourteenth century. Venice, the great entrepôt of trade with the east, probably issued regulations as early as 1127, and was the first city to issue a complete quarantine code in 1448. This code provided the model for all subsequent regulations over the next four centuries. Initially these European quarantines were limited to the exclusion of goods and people from stricken localities, but as time went on they were increasingly extended to foreign places as well, especially in sea ports.
By the sixteenth century the practice of quarantine was well established across Europe, and British governments also began to adopt the policy. It was not until the eighteenth century, however, that comprehensive codes of practice were put into place in response to the last outbursts of plague on the European continent — in the Baltic states between 1709 and 1712, and at Marseilles in 1721. These early eighteenth-century regulations were apparently successful at staving off the menace of plague, and were repeatedly revised and renewed over the next hundred years.
The arrival of Asiatic cholera in Europe in 1830, against which quarantines proved singularly ineffective, heralded the demise of the system. In England, commercial and trade interests were already beginning to protest against the restrictions imposed by the system in the mid 1820s, and the experiences with cholera in 1832 and 1848 confirmed commercial opposition to the practice. Both England and France, as colonial trading powers with wide international interests, increasingly questioned the necessity of quarantine, and in 1851 an international congress was called to consider the issue. In following decades, opposition from countries like Spain, Portugal, Greece, and Sweden was gradually eroded at a series of international congresses, and by the successful development by the British of a rival system of surveillance and port supervision. Indeed, the development of the electric telegraph, which so greatly facilitated international communications, permitted the dissemination not only of information on local disease prevalences, but also on the route, condition, and expected arrival of individual ships. Technological developments, as much as commercial pressures, were critical in undermining the rationale for international quarantine systems. At the congresses of Venice and Dresden in 1892 and 1893, the international quarantine system was largely dismantled, to be replaced by supervision systems on the British model. For some years, however, quarantine remained an issue with regard to India, partly because of her reputation as the home of cholera and of plague, and partly because of the complications of the annual pilgrimages of Indian Muslims to Mecca and Medina.
Even into the twentieth century, quarantines were occasionally imposed under the threat of invading epidemics, as when Sydney was quarantined by other Australian states on the outbreak of plague there in 1900. On the smaller scale, too, informal domestic household quarantines continued to be adopted, until well into the twentieth century, for children and adults potentially incubating infectious diseases such as measles and chicken-pox.
— Anne Hardy
See also infectious diseases.
Quarantine is defined as a restriction of the activities of healthy persons or animals who have been exposed to a communicable disease. The aim is to prevent transmission of the disease from potentially infected persons to healthy persons during the incubation period. Quarantine can take two forms: absolute or complete quarantine, which consists of a limitation of freedom for a period equal to the longest usual incubation period of the disease; and modified quarantine, which involves selective or partial limitation of movement, based on known differences in susceptibility. Examples of a modified quarantine are the exclusion of children from school and the confining of military personnel to their base. Modified quarantine includes personal surveillance, medical supervision, and segregation of the individual or group; or the establishment of a cordon sanitaire (a boundary zone between uninfected and infected or exposed persons).
The word "quarantine" derives from the Italian quaranta dei (forty days), a reminder that the custom of segregating putatively infected persons, and the ships on which they were traveling, originated in the maritime empire of Venice in the fourteenth century. The length of time probably relates to the biblical story of the forty days Jesus spent in the wilderness, not to any real knowledge of the mode of transmission of infection. The rise of the practice, however, suggests that there was some understanding of the concept of contagion even if there was no empirical knowledge of infective periods and incubation times of the plagues that afflicted medieval Europe. Few infectious diseases have an incubation time or infective period greater than forty days. An exception is rabies, which may not declare itself for many months. That is why animals that may have been exposed to rabies are quarantined for many months when they arrive in countries where rabies does not exist.
Animal and plant quarantine procedures are often more important than human quarantine now that many of the most dangerous contagious diseases can be kept under observation without such draconian restrictions as formerly required. The economic importance of agriculture and animal husbandry in many countries makes it absolutely essential to exclude diseases that might wipe out valuable cattle herds or destroy a season's harvest. A very important human disease with an incubation time that can, and probably usually does, exceed forty days is HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) infection, but for reasons that have more to do with human rights than epidemiological insights there is no quarantine for persons exposed to HIV infection.
Quarantine as a way to control the spread of contagious diseases is an extreme form of isolation, which has several less severe variations. Bedside isolation, in which patients suffering from an infectious disease are barrier nursed to break the chain of transmission, is the mildest variation. More dangerous varieties of contagious disease, such as pulmonary tuberculosis with excretion of tubercle bacilli, diphtheria, and cholera, are preferably isolated in a special hospital or closed ward. Until recently, patients with such diseases as typhoid, paralytic poliomyelitis, and meningococcal meningitis were strictly isolated and every effort was made to preserve a cordon sanitaire around them. Their contacts were quarantined under public health laws in some jurisdictions, even though epidemiologically this made little or no sense as a means of preventing transmission of infection. Powerful antibiotics and better understanding have made quarantine unnecessary for these and many other diseases. Infected patients are now often treated in a general hospital rather than in one dedicated to infectious diseases. The practice of universal precautions is a modified form of quarantine in which patients with a contagious disease (such as HIV/AIDS [acquired immunodeficiency syndrome]) are barrier nursed and otherwise cared for so as to minimize the risk of HIV transmission.
Quarantine goes further than isolation because it includes the compulsory segregation of contacts of infectious cases. It therefore involves infringing upon the liberty of outwardly healthy people, and this has both legal and ethical implications. Any restriction of a person's freedom to move must be justified, and such a restriction sanctioned by public health laws and regulations in many nations. In the early twentieth century most industrial nations had lengthy lists of contagious diseases to which quarantine laws applied. By the 1960s most of these diseases could be controlled without such severe restrictions, and in 1969 the World Health Organization issued international health regulations for just four designated quarantinable diseases: cholera, plague, yellow fever, and smallpox. Smallpox was proclaimed eradicated by WHO in 1979, and the other diseases on the list (except cholera in some parts of the world and, occasionally, yellow fever in others) are now rarely encountered or respond well to medical treatment. The quarantine stations that were formerly a feature of large seaports around the world have been abandoned, dismantled, or turned into holiday resorts. Quarantine law and regulations still apply in many countries, however, to protect animals and plants of economic importance from exotic diseases.
Public health officials who invoke quarantine laws or regulations must justify this action ethically—on the grounds that it is in the interests of the greater good of the community. In the past, this police power of public health officials was accepted by most people as a necessary measure to control the spread of contagious disease. Community values changed in the late twentieth century, however, and there is now emotional and political resistance to restricting freedom in the interests of safeguarding the public's health. It is regarded as ethically unacceptable to quarantine promiscuous persons who are HIV-positive, even though it might be in the best interests of the general public to do so. In some places, public health officials have invoked the police power of their quarantine regulations and, sometimes with the assistance of local police forces, they have incarcerated incorrigibly promiscuous persons infected with HIV/AIDS. AIDS activists and civil rights advocates oppose this, and a debate that played out in relation to detention of polio contacts in the early twentieth century is being reprised.
(SEE ALSO: Barrier Nursing; Communicable Disease Control; Ethics of Public Health; Isolation; Notifiable Diseases)
— JOHN M. LAST
n.a state, period, or place of isolation in which people or animals that have arrived from elsewhere or been exposed to infectious or contagious disease are placed: many animals die in quarantine.
v.impose such isolation on (a person, animal, or place); put in quarantine.
Etymology: mid 17th cent.: from Italian quarantina ‘forty days, ’ from quaranta ‘forty.’See the Introduction, Abbreviations and Pronunciation for further details.
Local quarantine regulations are also in effect to guard against the spread of communicable disease. Public health laws require that physicians report certain infections to the authorities. The patients (and those who have come in contact with them) may be isolated and their effects disinfected, condemned, or destroyed, if it is in the public interest, since quarantine laws supersede even property rights. Although antibiotics, vaccinations, and other treatments have greatly reduced the use of quarantine in public health, persons with newly recognized or hard to treat communicable diseases may still be isolated by health officials. For example, quarantine was used effectively to control the spread of SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome), a sometimes deadly pneumonialike illness, in 2003.
The isolation of people who either have a contagious disease or have been exposed to one, in an attempt to prevent the spread of the disease.
Dealing with contagious and infectious diseases on board
The word quarantine is a corruption of the French quarantaine, from quarante, meaning 40. In other words, it’s a period of 40 days.In sailing-ship days, that’s how long a vessel was forbidden to have contact with the shore if she arrived in port with actual or suspected malignant contagious disease among the people on board. She was sent to an isolated quarantine anchorage, and patients removed from the vessel might be sent to a nearby quarantine hospital.Today, of course, there is little heard about quarantine in connection with ships, not only because of better disease control and prevention, but also because few passengers now spend so many months at sea on long passages.Nevertheless, it is still the correct procedure for a yacht arriving in a foreign port to fly the Q (quarantine) flag of the international code from her port spreader. It’s a plain yellow rectangle that signifies “My vessel is healthy and I request free pratique.” Pratique is derived from the French word practiquer, meaning “to practice” (the letter c seems to have been omitted along the way). Therefore, free pratique means “permission to do business ashore or use a port’s facilities.”Incidentally, don’t ever use two Q flags, one over the other, unless you’re in deadly earnest. The signal means: “My ship is suspect; that is, I have had cases of infectious diseases more than five days ago, or there has been unusual mortality among the rats on board my ship.”See also Code Flags; Flags.
You may need to quarantine your pet before you bring it into a foreign country.
LearnThatWord.com is a free vocabulary and spelling program where you only pay for results!
A quarantine may indicate the dreamer feels the need to prevent contact with people or situations that might contaminate the dreamer or the dreamer's family.
1. a place or period of detention of ships or aircraft coming from infected or suspected ports.
2. restrictions placed on entering or leaving premises or regions where a case of communicable disease exists or is suspected.
The isolation or confinement of a person or persons with a known or possible contagious disease.
Quarantine is compulsory isolation, typically to contain the spread of something considered dangerous, often but not always disease. The word comes from the Italian (seventeenth century Venetian) quarantena, meaning forty-day period.[1] Quarantine can be applied to humans, but also to animals of various kinds.
|
Contents
|
|
|
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (April 2007) |
The quarantining of people often raises questions of civil rights, especially in cases of long confinement or segregation from society, such as that of Mary Mallon (aka Typhoid Mary), a typhoid fever carrier who spent the last 24 years of her life under quarantine.
Quarantine periods can be very short, such as in the case of a suspected anthrax attack, in which persons are allowed to leave as soon as they shed their potentially contaminated garments and undergo a decontamination shower. For example, an article entitled "Daily News workers quarantined" describes a brief quarantine that lasted until people could be showered in a decontamination tent. (Kelly Nankervis, Daily News).
The February/March 2003 issue of HazMat Magazine suggests that people be "locked in a room until proper decon could be performed", in the event of "suspect anthrax".
Standard-Times senior correspondent Steve Urbon (14 February 2003) describes such temporary quarantine powers:
Civil rights activists in some cases have objected to people being rounded up, stripped and showered against their will. But Capt. Chmiel said local health authorities have "certain powers to quarantine people."
The purpose of such quarantine-for-decontamination is to prevent the spread of contamination, and to contain the contamination such that others are not put at risk from a person fleeing a scene where contamination is suspect. It can also be used to limit exposure, as well as eliminate a vector.
The first astronauts to visit the Moon were quarantined upon their return at the specially built Lunar Receiving Laboratory.
New developments for quarantine include new concepts in quarantine vehicles such as the Ambulance bus, mobile hospitals, and lockdown/invacuation (inverse evacuation) procedures, as well as docking stations for an ambulance bus to dock to a facility that's under lockdown.
The separation of infected people in order to prevent the spread of disease was practiced in many early societies, as recorded in Leviticus chapter 13 of the Hebrew Bible.[2]
The word "quarantine" originates from the Venetian dialect form of the Italian quaranta giorni, meaning 'forty days'. This is due to the 40 day isolation of ships and people prior to entering the city of Dubrovnik in Dalmatia – Croatia (formerly known as Ragusa). This was practiced as a measure of disease prevention related to the plague (Black Death). Between 1348 and 1359 the Black Death wiped out an estimated 30% of Europe's population, as well as a significant percentage of Asia's population. The original document from 1377, which is kept in the Archives of Dubrovnik, states that before entering the city, newcomers had to spend 30 days (a trentine) in a restricted location (originally nearby islands) waiting to see whether the symptoms of plague would develop. Later on, isolation was prolonged to 40 days and was called quarantine.[3]
Other diseases lent themselves to the practice of quarantine before and after the devastation of the Plague. Those afflicted with leprosy were historically isolated from society, the attempts to check the invasion of syphilis in northern Europe about 1490, the advent of yellow fever in Spain at the beginning of the nineteenth century and the arrival of Asiatic cholera in 1831.
Venice took the lead in measures to check the spread of plague, having appointed three guardians of the public health in the first years of the Black Death (1348). The next record of preventive measures comes from Reggio in Modena in 1374. The first lazaret was founded by Venice in 1403, on a small island adjoining the city; in 1467 Genova followed the example of Venice; and in 1476 the old leper hospital of Marseille was converted into a plague hospital. The great lazaret of that city, perhaps the most complete of its kind, having been founded in 1526 on the island of Pomgue. The practice at all the Mediterranean lazarets was not different from the English procedure in the Levantine and North African trade. On the approach of cholera in 1831 some new lazarets were set up at western ports, notably a very extensive establishment near Bordeaux, afterwards turned to another use.
The plague had disappeared from England, never to return, for more than thirty years before the practice of quarantine against it was definitely established by the Quarantine Act 1710 (9 Ann.) The first act was called for, owing to an alarm, lest plague should be imported from Poland and the Baltics; the second act of 1721 was due to the disastrous prevalence of plague at Marseille and other places in Provence; it was renewed in 1733 owing to a fresh outbreak of the malady on the continent of Europe, and again in 1743, owing to the disastrous epidemic at Messina. In 1752 a rigorous quarantine clause was introduced into an act regulating the Levantine trade; and various arbitrary orders were issued during the next twenty years to meet the supposed danger of infection from the Baltics. Although no plague cases ever came to England all those years, the restrictions on traffic became more and more stringent (following the movements of medical dogma), and in 1788 a very oppressive Quarantine Act was passed, with provisions affecting cargoes in particular. The first year of the nineteenth century marked the turning-point in quarantine legislation; a parliamentary committee sat on the practice, and a more reasonable act arose on their report. In 1805 there was another new act, and in 1823–24 again an elaborate inquiry followed by an act making the quarantine only at discretion of the privy council, and at the same time recognizing yellow fever or other highly infectious disorder as calling for quarantine measures along with plague. The steady approach of cholera in 1831 was the last occasion in England of a thoroughgoing resort to quarantine restrictions. The pestilence invaded every country of Europe despite all efforts to keep it out. In England the experiment of hermetically sealing the ports was not seriously tried when cholera returned in 1849, 1853 and 1865–66. In 1847 the privy council ordered all arrivals with clean bills from the Black Sea and the Levant to be admitted to free pratique, provided there had been no case of plague during the voyage; and therewith the last remnant of the once formidable quarantine practice against plague may be said to have disappeared.
For a number of years after the passing of the first Quarantine Act (1710) the protective practices in England were of the most haphazard and arbitrary kind. In 1721 two vessels laden with cotton goods from Cyprus, then a seat of plague, were ordered to be burned with their cargoes, the owners receiving £23,935 as indemnity. By the clause in the Levant Trade Act of 1752 vessels for the United Kingdom with a foul bill (i.e. coming from a country where plague existed) had to repair to the lazarets of Malta, Venice, Messina, Livorno, Genoa or Marseille, to perform their quarantine or to have their cargoes sufficiently opened and aired. Since 1741 Stangate Creek (on the Medway) had been made the quarantine station at home; but it would appear from the above clause that it was available only for vessels with clean bills. In 1755 lazarets in the form of floating hulks were established in England for the first time, the cleansing of cargo (particularly by exposure to dews) having been done previously on the ships deck. There was no medical inspection employed, but the whole routine left to the officers of customs and quarantine. In 1780, when plague was in Poland, even vessels with grain from the Baltic had to lie forty days in quarantine, and unpack and air the sacks; but owing to remonstrances, which came chiefly from Edinburgh and Leith, grain was from that date declared to be a non-susceptible article. About 1788 an order of the council required every ship liable to quarantine, in case of meeting any vessel at sea, or within four leagues of the coast of Great Britain or Ireland, to hoist a yellow flag in the daytime and show a light at the main topmast head at night, under a penalty of £200. After 1800, ships from plague-countries (or with foul bills) were enabled to perform their quarantine on arrival in the Medway instead of taking a Mediterranean port on the way for that purpose; and about the same time an extensive lazaret was built on Chetney Hill near Chatham at an expense of £170,000, which was almost at once condemned owing to its marshy foundations, and the materials sold for £15,000. The use of floating hulks as lazarets continued as before. In 1800 two ships with hides from Mogador (Morocco) were ordered to be sunk with their cargoes at the Nore, the owners receiving £15,000. About this period it was merchandise that was chiefly suspected: there was a long schedule of susceptible articles, and these were first exposed on the ships deck for twenty-one days or less (six days for each instalment of the cargo), and then transported to the lazaret, where they were opened and aired forty days more. The whole detention of the vessel was from sixty to sixty-five days, including the time for reshipment of her cargo. Pilots had to pass fifteen days on board a convalescent ship. The expenses may be estimated from one or two examples. In 1820 the Asia, 763 tons, arrived in the Medway with a foul bill from Alexandria, laden with linseed; her freight was £1475 and her quarantine dues £610. The same year the Pilato, 495 tons, making the same voyage, paid £200 quarantine dues on a freight of £1060. In 1823 the expenses of the quarantine service (at various ports) were £26,090, and the dues paid by shipping (nearly all with clean bills) £22,000. A return for the United Kingdom and colonies in 1849 showed, among other details, that the expenses of the lazaret at Malta for ten years from 1839 to 1848 had been £53,553. From 1846 onwards the establishments in the United Kingdom were gradually reduced, while the last vestige of the British quarantine law was removed by the Public Health Act 1896, which repealed the Quarantine Act 1825 (with dependent clauses of other acts), and transferred from the privy council to the Local Government Board the powers to deal with ships arriving infected with yellow fever or plague, the powers to deal with cholera ships having been already transferred by the Public Health Act 1875.
The British regulations of ninth November 1896 applied to yellow fever, plague and cholera. Officers of the Customs, as well as of Coast Guard and Board of Trade (for signalling), were empowered to take the initial steps. They certified in writing the master of a supposed infected ship, and detained the vessel provisionally for not more than twelve hours, giving notice meanwhile to the port sanitary authority. The medical officer of the port boarded the ship and examined every person in it. Every person found infected was certified of the fact, removed to a hospital provided (if his condition allow), and kept under the orders of the medical officer. If the sick could be removed, the vessel remained under his orders. Every person suspected (owing to his or her immediate attendance on the sick) could be detained on board for 48 hours or removed to the hospital for a similar period. All others were free to land on giving the addresses of their destinations to be sent to the respective local authorities, so that the dispersed passengers and crew could be kept individually under observation for a few days. The ship was then disinfected, dead bodies buried at sea, infected clothing, bedding, etc., destroyed or disinfected, and bilge-water and water-ballast (subject to exceptions) pumped out at a suitable distance before the ship entered a dock or basin. Mails were subject to no detention. A stricken ship within 3 miles of the shore had to fly at the main mast a yellow and black flag borne quarterly from sunrise to sunset.
Quarantine law began in Colonial America in 1663, when in an attempt to curb an outbreak of smallpox, the city of New York established a quarantine. In the 1730s, the city built a quarantine station on the Bedloe's Island.[4] The Philadelphia Lazaretto was the first quarantine hospital in the United States, built in 1799, in Tinicum Township, Delaware County, Pennsylvania.[5] There are similar national landmarks such as Swinburne Island and Angel Island (a much more famous historic site, Ellis Island, is often mistakenly assumed to have been a quarantine station, however its marine hospital only qualified as a contagious disease facility to handle less virulent diseases like measles, trachoma and less advanced stages of tuberculosis and diphtheria; persons afflicted with smallpox, yellow fever, cholera, leprosy or typhoid fever, could neither be received nor treated there). During the 1918 flu pandemic, people were also quarantined. The last person to be quarantined in the United States was a woman in 1963 for smallpox.[6]
In the summer of 2007, Atlanta attorney Andrew Speaker made headlines[7] when, while traveling in Italy on his honeymoon, he was diagnosed by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) with extremely drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB), a contagious, untreatable and potentially-lethal condition. Against the instructions of U.S. public health authorities, Speaker re-entered the U.S. only to be served by the CDC with a federal order of quarantine at a hospital in New York, the first such order to be issued in nearly half a century. Speaker challenged the CDC’s diagnosis of XDR-TB, resulting in an eventual downgrade of his condition and the lifting of restrictions on his movements. The Speaker case generated significant public attention and Congress conducted formal hearings regarding the incident. Speaker’s case highlights a crucial issue in public health law: the circumstances, if any, under which public officials may detain individuals against their will in order to protect the public from communicable diseases. In other words, when do utilitarian principles of social good trump the guarantees of individual rights afforded by the United States Constitution?[8]
Since 1852 several conferences have been held between delegates of the European powers, with a view to uniform action in keeping out infection from the East and preventing its spread within Europe; all but that of 1897 were occupied with cholera. No result came of those at Paris (1852), Constantinople (1866), Vienna (1874), and Rome (1885), but each of the subsequent ones has been followed by an international convention on the part of nearly one-half of the governments represented. The general effect has been an abandonment of the high quarantine doctrine of constructive infection of a ship as coming from a scheduled port, and an approximation to the principles advocated by Great Britain for many years. The principal countries which retained the old system at the time were Spain, Portugal, Turkey, Greece and Russia (the British possessions at the time, Gibraltar, Malta and Cyprus, being under the same influence). The aim of each international sanitary convention had been to bind the governments to a uniform minimum of preventive action, with further restrictions permissible to individual countries. The minimum specified by international conventions were very nearly the same as the British practice, which had been in turn adapted to continental opinion in the matter of the importation of rags.
The Venice convention of 30 January 1892 was on cholera by the Suez Canal route; that of Dresden of 15 April 1893, on cholera within European countries; that of Paris of 3 April 1894, on cholera by the pilgrim traffic; and that of Venice, on 19 March 1897, was in connection with the outbreak of plague in the East, and the conference met to settle on an international basis the steps to be taken to prevent, if possible, its spread into Europe. An additional convention was signed in Paris on 3 December 1903.[9]
A multilateral international sanitary convention was concluded at Paris on 17 January 1912.[10] This convention was most comprehensive and was designated to replace all previous conventions on that matter. It was signed by 40 countries, and consisted of 160 articles. Ratifications by 16 of the signatories were exchanged in Paris on 7 October 1920. Another multilateral convention was signed in Paris on 21 June 1926, to replace that of 1912. It was signed by 58 countries worldwide, and consisted of 172 articles.[11]
In Latin America, a series of regional sanitary conventions were concluded. Such a convention was concluded in Rio de Janeiro on 12 June 1904. A sanitary convention between the governments of Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay was concluded in Montevideo on 21 April 1914.[12] The convention covers cases of Asiatic Cholera, Oriental Plague and Yellow Fever. It was ratified by the Uruguayan government on 13 October 1914, by the Paraguayan government on 27 September 1917 and by the Brazilian government on 18 January 1921.
Sanitary conventions were also concluded between European states. A Soviet-Latvian sanitary convention was signed on 24 June 1922, for which ratifications were exchanged on 18 October 1923.[13] A bilateral sanitary convention was concluded between the governments of Latvia and Poland on 7 July 1922, for which ratifications were exchanged on 7 April 1925.[14] Another was concluded between the governments of Germany and Poland in Dresden on 18 December 1922, and entered into effect on 15 February 1923.[15] Another one was signed between the governments of Poland and Romania on 20 December 1922. Ratifications were exchanged on 11 July 1923.[16] The Polish government also concluded such a convention with the Soviet government on 7 February 1923, for which ratifications were exchanged on 8 January 1924.[17] A sanitary convention was also concluded between the governments of Poland and Czechoslovakia on 5 September 1925, for which ratifications were exchanged on 22 October 1926.[18] A convention was signed between the governments of Germany and Latvia on 9 July 1926, for which ratifications were exchanged on 6 July 1927.[19]
One of the first points to be dealt with in 1897 was to settle the incubation period for this disease, and the period to be adopted for administrative purposes. It was admitted that the incubation period was, as a rule, a comparatively short one, namely, of some three or four days. After much discussion ten days was accepted by a very large majority. The principle of disease notification was unanimously adopted. Each government had to notify to other governments on the existence of plague within their several jurisdictions, and at the same time state the measures of prevention which are being carried out to prevent its diffusion. The area deemed to be infected was limited to the actual district or village where the disease prevailed, and no locality was deemed to be infected merely because of the importation into it of a few cases of plague while there has been no diffusion of the malady. As regards the precautions to be taken on land frontiers, it was decided that during the prevalence of plague every country had the inherent right to close its land frontiers against traffic. As regards the Red Sea, it was decided after discussion that a healthy vessel could pass through the Suez Canal, and continue its voyage in the Mediterranean during the period of incubation of the disease the prevention of which is in question. It was also agreed that vessels passing through the Canal in quarantine might, subject to the use of the electric light, coal in quarantine at Port Said by night as well as by day, and that passengers might embark in quarantine at that port. Infected vessels, if these carry a doctor and are provided with a disinfecting stove, have a right to navigate the Canal, in quarantine, subject only to the landing of those who were suffering from plague.
There are three quarantine Acts of Parliament in Canada: Quarantine Act (humans) and Health of Animals Act (animals) and Plant Protection Act (vegetations). The first legislation is enforced by the Canada Border Services Agency after a complete rewrite in 2005. The second and third legislations are enforced by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency. If a health emergency exists, the Governor in Council can prohibit importation of anything that it deems necessary under the Quarantine Act.
Under the Quarantine Act, all travellers must submit to screening and if they believe they might have come into contact with communicable disease or vectors, they must disclose their whereabouts to a Border Services Officer. If the officer has reasonable grounds that the traveller is or might have been infected with a communicable disease or refused to provider answers, a quarantine officer (QO) must be called and the person is to be isolated. If a person refused to be isolated, any peace officer may arrest without warrant.
A QO who has reasonable grounds to believe that the traveller has or might have a communicable disease or is infested with vectors, after the medical examination of a traveller, can order him/her into treatment or measures to prevent the person from spreading the disease. QO can detained any traveller who refused to comply with his/her order or undergo health assessments as required by law.
Under the Health of Animals Act and Plant Protection Act, inspectors can prohibit access to an infected area, dispose or treat any infected or suspected to be infected animals or plants. The Minister can order for compensation to be given if animals/plants were destroyed purusant to these acts.
Each provinces also enacts its own quarantine/environmental health legislations.
Under the Prevention and Control of Disease Ordinance (HK Laws. Chap 599), a health officer may seize articles he/she believes to be infectious or contains infectious agents. All travellers, if requested, must submit themselves to a health officer. Failure to do so is against the law and is subject to arrest and prosecution.
The law allows for a health officer who have reasonable grounds to detain, isolate, quarantine anyone or anything believed to be infected and to restrict any articles from leaving a designated quarantine area. He/she may also order the Civil Aviation Department to prohibit the landing or leaving, embarking or disembarking of an aircraft. This power also extends to land, sea or air crossings.
Under the same ordinance, any police officer, health officer, members of the Civil Aid Service or Auxiliary Medical Service can arrest a person who obstructs or escape from detention.
To reduce the risk of introducing rabies from Continental Europe, the United Kingdom used to require that dogs, and most other animals introduced to the country spend six months in quarantine at an HM Customs and Excise pound; this policy was abolished at the beginning of the twenty-first century in favour of a scheme generally known as Pet Passports, where animals can avoid quarantine if they have documentation showing they are up to date on their appropriate vaccinations.
The United States puts immediate quarantines on imported products if the disease can be traced back to a certain shipment or product. All imports will also be quarantined if the diseases breakout in other countries.
Australia has got the world's strictest quarantine laws on products imported from other countries. As Australia has been geographically isolated from other major continents for millions of years, there is an endemically unique ecosystem free of pests and diseases.[citation needed] If other products are brought inside along with pests and diseases, it would damage the ecosystem seriously and add millions of costs in the local agricultural businesses.[citation needed]
The Australian Quarantine and Inspection Service is responsible for border-inspection of any products which are brought into Australia, and assess the potential risks the products might harm Australian environment. Visitors are required to fill in the information card truthfully before arriving in Australia, and declare what food, other edible products, any products made of wood and other natural materials they have processed. If the visitor fails to do so, usually a quarantine fine of 220 Australian dollars are to be paid as quarantine infringement notice, and if not, the visitor may face criminal convictions of fining 100,000 Australian dollars and 10 years imprisonment.
U.S. President John F. Kennedy euphemistically referred to the U.S. Navy's interdiction of shipping en route to Cuba during the Cuban missile crisis as a "quarantine" rather than a blockade, because a quarantine is a legal act in peacetime, whereas a blockade is defined as an act of aggression under the U.N. Charter.
In computer science, it describes putting files infected by computer viruses into a special directory, so as to eliminate the threat they pose, without irreversibly deleting them.
| Look up quarantine in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. |
This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
Dansk (Danish)
n. - karantæne
v. tr. - holde i karantæne, isolere
Nederlands (Dutch)
in quarantaine plaatsen, quarantaine
Français (French)
n. - quarantaine
v. tr. - mettre en quarantaine
Deutsch (German)
n. - Quarantäne
v. - unter Quarantäne stellen
Ελληνική (Greek)
n. - απομόνωση, καραντίνα
v. - απομονώνω, βάζω σε καραντίνα
Italiano (Italian)
mettere in quarantena, mettere in isolamento, isolare, quarantena, isolamento
Português (Portuguese)
n. - quarentena (f)
v. - colocar de quarentena
Русский (Russian)
держать в карантине, карантин
Español (Spanish)
n. - cuarentena
v. tr. - poner en cuarentena
Svenska (Swedish)
n. - karantän
v. - hålla i karantän, hålla isolerad
中文(简体)(Chinese (Simplified))
隔离, 隔离区, 检疫, 检疫所, 使隔离, 使孤立, 使受检疫, 与...断绝关系
中文(繁體)(Chinese (Traditional))
n. - 隔離, 隔離區, 檢疫, 檢疫所
v. tr. - 使隔離, 使孤立, 使受檢疫, 與...斷絕關係
한국어 (Korean)
n. - 격리, 고립화 검역소, 교통차단
v. tr. - 격리하다, 검역하다, 절교하다
日本語 (Japanese)
n. - 隔離, 検疫, 隔離期間, 隔離所
v. - 隔離する, 検疫する
العربيه (Arabic)
(الاسم) كرنتينا, مدة أربعين يوم, حجز صحي, محجر صحي, مرحله فحص القوارب قبل دخولها المينا (فعل) حجر حجرا صحيا
עברית (Hebrew)
n. - בידוד או הסגר (רפואי)
v. tr. - החזיק בהסגר או בבידוד
If you are unable to view some languages clearly, click here.