answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

first answer: It is very true. If the League of Nations had taken action like it was supposed to, threatening violent countries like Germany by stopping trade or attacking them back, then Germany would've been unable to expand and ceize land that was not theirs. But it is also true that we shouldn't blame the League of Nations for everything. Many people had already believed that Germany had been treated too poorly in the Treaty of Versailles, and thought that it was fair for Germany to get a bit more land back. Hitler also used a great deal of trickery. He told world leaders that he merely wanted to get a bit more land to help Germany a little, and didn't intend to go to a world war. He also had many promises he broke, such as promising to not attack Austria. When Hitler had wanted to capture Czechoslovakia, he didn't just rush in and attack, as Czechoslovakia was supposedly protected by France and Russia. Hitler invited the leader of France over, and told him that he wished to capture a small portion of Czechoslovakia, and that he would stop capturing land entirely. France promptly agreed, and a part of Czechoslavakia, Sudetenland, was given to Germany. Hitler promptly broke his promise of stopping his conquest for land, and captured the rest of Czechoslavakia. At this point the countries realized that Hitler was not to be trusted, but Hitler had already gained popularity with his citizens, and was gaining momentum. So though it was true that the League of Nations should have stepped in and stopped Hitler from capturing land, it is also true that Hitler had decieved a great deal of them, and managed to capture land with little force.

second more correct answer: Although much of the first answer is correct, the League of Nations had no enforcement powers, no army, no navy, etc. The League could establish moral, ethical or international legal thresh holds for actions. However it required individual nations to take action against the aggression. Britain & France were unwilling in 1936-1938 to risk war with Germany to try to prevent Hitler's aggression.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: 'By failing to resist aggression in the 1930s the League of Nations made Hitler's work easy' How fair is this judgment on the actions of the League in the 1930s?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about World History

Appeasment or hitlers actions in World War 2 which was the most important?

Hitler's actions were the most important.


Four factors leading to the growing European tension included what?

Factors leading to the growing tension in Europe included the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact, the policy of appeasement, and the failures of the League of Nations. Last, but not least, were the dictatorships of Hitler in Germany and Mussolini in Italy.


Do you have responsibilities to other nations of the world?

We all have responsibilities towards each other. But, before one can accept responsibilities for others one must be adept at accepting responsibility for oneself. Accepting responsibilities for ones owns actions can be daunting enough, but we must. How else then, can we accept the responsibilities of others actions? And that we must is a painful given. The problem with accepting responsibilities for other nations or even your own becomes exponentially amplified. In the end, yes we do have responsibilities to other nations, our own but most importantly to the ones around us and ourselves.


What aggressive actions by European and Asian nations threatened world peace between 1930 and 1937?

The Japanese invasion of Manchuria in 1931The invasion of Abbysinia by Italy in 1935The re-militarisation of the Rhineland by Germany in 1936All these were aggressive actions, but whether they threatened world peace is debatable.


Why according to Kant are wrongful actions contradictory?

according to kant, are wronful actions contradictory?

Related questions

What country reacted to hitlers actions?

Great Britain & France


Appeasment or hitlers actions in World War 2 which was the most important?

Hitler's actions were the most important.


When the allies did nothing about Hitlers actions that violated the treaty this was called?

Appeasement


What did Hitler's wife think of what he did?

Eva Braun was a supporter of Hitlers actions


Why was world war ll fought?

mainly because they wanted to stop Hitlers actions


How did adolf hitlers actions affect the culture?

Small toothbrush mustaches are significantly less popular


Why did the national league of nation prevent German and Italian aggression against other nations?

The League of Nations attempted to prevent German and Italian aggression through diplomatic negotiations, economic sanctions, and collective security measures. However, these efforts were not always successful in deterring the aggressive actions of these countries. Additionally, the League itself lacked the necessary enforcement mechanisms and the support of major powers to effectively curb the aggression of its member states.


What is axis aggression?

The Axis Aggression in WWII is just what you have already stated. It is the aggressive actions of Germany, Italy, Spain, and Japan during WWII. Remember that when the Axis Aggression was created the U.S. was not yet involved in the war.


Who did the delegates appeal to for judgment of their actions in the declaration of independence?

God


How did world war 2 begain What was one of hitlers first political actions?

He started censoring information in newspapers


What were some of Adolf Hitlers actions?

he only liked people with blond hair blue eyes and he hated gewish people.


What policy did western democracies follow in response to hitlers aggressive actions prior to World War 2?

Appeasement Policy