Now if you had your seat belt on this would not have happened because you would not be able to get into the rear seat and you would've known it so you probably wouldn't have tried to.However now you are trapped upside down inside a burning vehicle.
I'm sorry what was I talking about again?
Answer 2
In practice, I don't think you would a lot of difference. Nobody wants to crash. However, you can easily see reasons why there might be a difference between seatbelt-wearing and non-seatbelt wearing drivers.
For example, people who don't wear seatbelts might try harder to avoid hitting something because they know the result is going to be painful. Have you ever noticed how Volvo drivers don't seem to care what they hit? Seatbelts could be kind of like that.
However, if someone wears a seatbelt, it at least means they are thinking of road safety and the possibility of injury and are taking steps to reduce it. Possibly they are better educated about safe driving and are generally better drivers because of this.
In World War I, the British air-force initially refused to give their pilots parachutes because they thought people would just jump out at the first sign of damage instead of fighting on and perhaps saving their expensive planes or downing the enemy. Unfortunately, this also meant a lot of pilots died needlessly.
I don't think that drivers blindly trust seatbelts to save them, and therefore will try just as hard to avoid accidents. For this and the reasons above, I think they may be involved in fewer accidents than people who don't wear seatbelts.
If wearing the seat belt properly, then no a passenger should not hit the windshield.If wearing the seat belt properly, then no a passenger should not hit the windshield.
60%
Wearing a seat belt has been reported to save more lives in an accident than wearing no seat belt.
TRUTHFULLY it sometimes depends on the car accident he or she is in minor car accidents can be resisted with wearing a seat belt major collisions can cause a person to get hurt because of the seat belt resits
yes, that's why when your in an accident and you get killed they all ways tell on the news report if you were or were not wearing a seat belt.
No way. There has been documented proof that wearing a seat belt can prevent most injuries.
In 2006, 42,642 people were killed in car accidents. The NHTSA was able to gather seat belt data on 30,251 of the 42,642 car occupants that died in car crashes. Nearly 56 percent, or 16836 people, of the 30,251 with available restraint information were not wearing seat belts at the time of the fatal auto accident. In conclusion, there are about 1403 people died every month due to not wearing a set belt in 2006.
112112211
If there is no seat belt fitted to the vehicle, then possibly. If theres a seatbelt fitted and its not used, then likely no.
Injuries that occur in a car as a result of a person not wearing their seat belt depends on the accident. If the impact is strong enough, they can be thrown from the car.
not as many as the car crashes in the world as people crash without wearing a seat belt. that's all I know
Generally no one in a hospital is wearing a seat belt.