If the theology is of a non-militant, or peaceful nature, allowing other beliefs and practices to co-exist, yes, this theology will hinder globalization because people are given the option to follow it, or not, according to their own free will. This prevents globalization because multi-cultural and/or pluralistic societies are not cohesive. (Modern Europe and America)
If the theology is aggressive and militant, teaching that it must be the ruling theology worldwide, no. In fact, it may tend to increase globalization because it will not co-exist with other competing theologies or ideologies.
Answer: No, theocracies do not hinder globalization. Whether a theocracy can actually overtake the entire globe, remains to be seen. So far, these have only been successful on a local/regional level. (Iran, Saudi Arabia, etc)
Globalization can both hinder and support development in Africa. On one hand, globalization can lead to exploitation of resources, widening income inequality, and loss of local culture. On the other hand, it can bring in investments, technology transfer, access to global markets, and opportunities for economic growth. It is essential for African countries to manage globalization effectively by developing policies that maximize the benefits and minimize the negative impacts.
Globalization
globalization
by banging your mom
Globalization- Growth to a global or worldwide scale; "the globalization of the communication industry"
globalization
Some people think globalization is good, but others oppose it. Globalization is a process of interaction and integration among the people, companies, and governments of different nations.
Globalization is the process by which the economy and cultures of many nations become integrated. The rate of globalization has increased due to advances in technology.
globalization is a process of free movement of capital labour technology etc
The United States illustrates the process of globalization through its reduced trade barriers, improved economic interactions, increased economic ties, and more emphasis on global cooperation.
Most theocracies throughout history did not have political parties (such as Ancient Egypt, Babylonia, Ancient Israel, the Safavid Empire, etc. Some theocracies, like the Islamic Republic of Iran certainly do have political parties. However, the theocrats themselves exist outside of the political process since the idea is that the theocrats have a singular religious perspective and are, therefore, not divided like the rest of the population.
The mobility of goods, services, labor, and capital